Re: [PD] external with more than 6 inlets possible?

2016-03-16 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 03/16/2016 03:13 AM, i go bananas wrote: > I'm scratching my head wondering what's happening with an external i have > written. The first 6 inlets work as expected, but not getting any response > from inlets 7 and 8. > I cut my code down as much as possible, and made a really simple external >

Re: [PD] LKFS or LUFS-based compression?

2016-03-16 Thread William Huston
Thanks Katja. I did not intend to imply a particular compression method. I was only asking if anyone has created a compressor in Pd with the goal of limiting based on Average Loudness rather than Peak Gain. I don't really know how it works, except to guess it is related to Fletcher–Munson

Re: [PD] LKFS or LUFS-based compression?

2016-03-16 Thread katja
Frankly I had to ask Wikipedia what LKFS and LUFS is. They are loudness standards, they don't indicate compression method. Here's a peculiar method which uses detection of instantaneous amplitudes instead of peak sample values: http://www.katjaas.nl/compander/compander.html From an engineer's

Re: [PD] GUI port: full triforce

2016-03-16 Thread João Pais
Great, I can test it as soon as possible. Am 16.03.2016 3:27 vorm. schrieb "Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list" < pd-list@lists.iem.at>: > > Hi list, > I now have the GUI port of Pd-l2ork up and running on GNU/Linux, OSX, and > Windows. > > One final dungeon of build script revisions and I'll release an

[PD] LKFS or LUFS-based compression?

2016-03-16 Thread William Huston
Has anyone played around with LKFS or LUFS-based "Loudness Compression"? This would be a really handy thing to have for anyone who creates audio for broadcast TV or Radio, or movie scores, etc. When people grab a compressor, this is what we mostly want. However, in my experience, most