Re: [PD] deken and windows

Yes your right, especially on respect to the last lines: .../preferences.txt Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. From: Pd-list on behalf of Dan Wilcox Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 5:03 AM To: Alexandre Torres Porres Cc: Pd-List Subject: Re: [PD]

Re: [PD] deken and windows

Maybe a good example would be the Processing preferences dialog: http://robotosha.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/preferences_window_processing.png > On Feb 17, 2017, at 9:01 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: >

Re: [PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches

On 2/17/2017 4:41 AM, zmoel...@iem.at wrote: On 02/17/2017 02:25 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: FWIW in pd-l2ork/purr-data loadbang fires even in dynamically created patches. so does that mean, that if i have an abstraction "foo": [loadbang] | [f 1] | [outlet] and i dynamically create a patch i

Re: [PD] deken and windows

2017-02-17 21:17 GMT-02:00 Dan Wilcox : > If you have a puredata.info account, you should be able to update it. > yep, got it, and I'm on it... I really wish to make an extensive tutorial on dealing with externals in Pd, you'll see ;) > but I wonder if there's a way for Pd to allow us to go th

Re: [PD] deken and windows

2017-02-17 18:51 GMT-02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > check the archives for the discussion on (not) automatically > creating those paths (...) i would like to avoid going through that > discussion *again*. > I could use some help like pointing me a thread subject or something, I usually never find d

Re: [PD] deken and windows

Text files are totally cool, geek UI. Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. From: Pd-list on behalf of Lucas Cordiviola Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 11:26 PM To: pd-list@lists.iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] deken and windows Well you are right. All the st

Re: [PD] deken and windows

Well you are right. All the startup flags can be used to do your own config file in a batch. But for example in the config file there could be a deken dir. So here we do 2 things, Set the any/user/friendly/path for externals and add it to Pd search path. Also by doing that, some auto-search ca

Re: [PD] deken and windows

> Now, going back to that FAQ link > >, I > guess we can replace it with something more up to date, and maybe include a > section "how install via

Re: [PD] deken and windows

On 02/17/2017 11:07 PM, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > I think that the config file is something that's becoming a “Must” . don't we have config "files" on all platforms? (on w32 it is hidden in the registry, but i don't see anything that couldn't be configured there as well). but the more important q

Re: [PD] deken and windows

Hi Roman, >Oh, I am definitely going to challenge that notion. I am totally convinced the _correct_ way for th >Sorry, since the topic came up, I had to express what I understand your point and you're right. But remember that those places where is safe to install externals are relat

Re: [PD] deken and windows

On Fre, 2017-02-17 at 21:51 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >  > > it's trivial to create those folders (deken did that in the past), > but > it has been consciously disabled. I disagree. I don't find it a conscious decision. > i would like to avoid going through that discussion *again*. Sorry

Re: [PD] deken and windows

On Fre, 2017-02-17 at 10:34 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >  > what deken does *not* do, is to automatically create any of the > standard > search paths for you (in case they don't exist). > this has been discussed at great lengths on this very list, and i > don't > think that this will change.

Re: [PD] deken and windows

On 02/17/2017 05:19 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Well, I missed the discussion then, as I wasn't using windows. the discussion was about deken and creating search paths, not about windows. the behaviour is the same on all platforms. > But now that > I'm trying it, I have to say the proce

Re: [PD] deken and windows

Now, going back to that FAQ link < http://puredata.info/docs/faq/how-do-i-install-externals-and-help-files>, I guess we can replace it with something more up to date, and maybe include a section "how install via Pd (deken)". Thus we'd have a general way of installing externals that are not availab

Re: [PD] deken and windows

2017-02-17 4:47 GMT-02:00 Lucas Cordiviola : > Wait a second. > > You have Pd-extended & Pd 0.47.1 both installed on the “C:\Program Files > (x86)\” ? > Yes, and also Purr Data by the way. Don't exactly remember the install process, but that's because I didn't do anything creative, just went wit

Re: [PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches

> in you example, you have 2 subpatch named sub Ouch... forgot to add a dollar zero... how stupid. thanks! > Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Februar 2017 um 15:03 Uhr > Von: "cyrille henry" > An: pd-list@lists.iem.at > Betreff: Re: [PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches > > hello > in you

[PD] CMMR 2017: 2nd Call for Contributions

[apologies for multiple postings] Dear all, This is the 2nd Call for Participation for the 13th International Symposium on Computer Music Multidisciplinary Research (CMMR 2017) which will be held in *Porto and Matosinhos, Portugal, on September 25th–28th, 2017*: http://cmmr2017.inesctec.pt CMMR

Re: [PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches

hello in you example, you have 2 subpatch named sub. both of them receive the loadbang. the 1st transfert it to the 2nd, and the 2nd receive also it's own. rename one of the subpatch to have only 1 loadbang. anyway. why using loadbang/initbang in dynamic patching? why not using a less confusing

Re: [PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches

Since you too mentioned the |loadbang( message method, do you (or others) have an idea why nested loadbangs fire more than once with this method? [initbang] on the other hand works just as expected. This is not an issue if one uses loadbang only to initialize some variable, but it can induce sub

Re: [PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches

On 02/17/2017 02:25 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: > FWIW in pd-l2ork/purr-data loadbang fires even in dynamically created > patches. so does that mean, that if i have an abstraction "foo": [loadbang] | [f 1] | [outlet] and i dynamically create a patch including that abstraction, the loadbang will

Re: [PD] deken and windows

On 02/17/2017 05:55 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: >> next time deken should offer you that dir. > > but it doesn't! So i got a bug here I guess... pretty sure you didn't. > it is asking me to install > in this folder, which seems to be the global folder as specified in your > link, but tha