Re: [PD] font issues/questions, and also discrepancies between operating systems
Em sex., 24 de jan. de 2020 às 18:35, IOhannes m zmölnig escreveu: > On 1/24/20 10:07 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > My best/ideal solution is if I could make cyclone/comment say *you tried > to > > load helvetica, but I loaded "x" instead* > > https://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl/TkCmd/font.htm#M5 > > that was the first hit i got when searching for "tcl get information on > current font" > Yeah, I had seen that, and I'm struggling to see if I can make that happen, but my coding skills are limited and things aren't that 100% straightforward for me, so I don't know if it's possible I figure it out :) > > >. Now, apparently this is handled > > internally via tk, > > actually no. > this is done on an OS-level. I don't remember where exactly I saw it, but it was one of these manuals/tutorials and stuff online that said so, but sure, I guess you can be right, cool. As far as my cross-platofrms issues, I guess things don't look that much terrible at all if we have actual different fonts for iemgui labels. But now that I know about it, it annoys me that other fonts besides DejaVu Sans Mono aren't really there. Perhaps this can be taken care just by mentioning in the documentation somewhere (if you don't have times/helvetica installed, similar fonts are loaded). It doesn't seem worth doing more than that and trying to ship the same group of 3 fonts like we're doing with dejavu, right? I guess the main issue as far as patch discrepancy goes is still how DejaVu is rendered in Pd's commments - I see some quite noticeable differences if I open a help patch with lots of written stuff in Linux, and some of the spacing I did fit in an area can get out of bounds in Linux - specially with line spacing, so it seems. cheers ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Audio delay by symples (for comb filter)
cyclone/delay~ and else/ffdelay~ also allow for delay lines defined in samples (or ms) but this can also be done in vanilla like people said (though somewhat inconvenient) cheers Em sáb., 25 de jan. de 2020 às 15:33, Ingo escreveu: > Thanks guys! > > [zexy/z~] looks exactly like what I'm looking for! > > Ingo > > > > you can just use [delwrite~] + [delread~], but you have to make sure that > > they are scheduled in the right order, see "G05.execution.order.pd" in > > "doc/3.audio.examples". Also, you have to convert from samples to > > milliseconds. > > > > For convenience, I often use [z~] from zexy, which is a delay line in a > > single > > object, with the delay time given in samples. > > > > Christof > > > > > > > Hi everybody! > > > > > > I'm planning on delaying a bandpass filter by samples to create a comb > > > filter effect. > > > Is this possible or can it be done only by audio blocks? > > > > > > If it is possible which object(s) would I use? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Ingo > > > > > > > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Audio delay by symples (for comb filter)
Thanks guys! [zexy/z~] looks exactly like what I'm looking for! Ingo > you can just use [delwrite~] + [delread~], but you have to make sure that > they are scheduled in the right order, see "G05.execution.order.pd" in > "doc/3.audio.examples". Also, you have to convert from samples to > milliseconds. > > For convenience, I often use [z~] from zexy, which is a delay line in a > single > object, with the delay time given in samples. > > Christof > > > > Hi everybody! > > > > I'm planning on delaying a bandpass filter by samples to create a comb > > filter effect. > > Is this possible or can it be done only by audio blocks? > > > > If it is possible which object(s) would I use? > > > > Thanks > > Ingo ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Audio delay by symples (for comb filter)
Hi, you can just use [delwrite~] + [delread~], but you have to make sure that they are scheduled in the right order, see "G05.execution.order.pd" in "doc/3.audio.examples". Also, you have to convert from samples to milliseconds. For convenience, I often use [z~] from zexy, which is a delay line in a single object, with the delay time given in samples. Christof > Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Januar 2020 um 18:46 Uhr > Von: "Ingo" > An: 'Pd-List' > Betreff: [PD] Audio delay by symples (for comb filter) > > Hi everybody! > > I'm planning on delaying a bandpass filter by samples to create a comb > filter effect. > Is this possible or can it be done only by audio blocks? > > If it is possible which object(s) would I use? > > Thanks > Ingo > > > > > > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Audio delay by symples (for comb filter)
With built ins you can use fexpr~ and with externals I think there is something in zexy? I'm curious to know if there is something else built in, maybe something with block~ in a sub patch? On January 25, 2020 9:46:38 AM PST, Ingo wrote: >Hi everybody! > >I'm planning on delaying a bandpass filter by samples to create a comb >filter effect. >Is this possible or can it be done only by audio blocks? > >If it is possible which object(s) would I use? > >Thanks >Ingo > > > > > >___ >Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Audio delay by symples (for comb filter)
Hi everybody! I'm planning on delaying a bandpass filter by samples to create a comb filter effect. Is this possible or can it be done only by audio blocks? If it is possible which object(s) would I use? Thanks Ingo ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pd~] subprocess in libpd ?
I haven't done it... but two pointers: you'll have to keep throwing DSP ticks at libpd to get the subprocess to do anything... and unless you've got the latest Pd source (post-0.50) the subprocess doesn't get started if there is white space in its path. Let us know how it goes :) Miller On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 10:15:34PM +0800, Matt Davey wrote: > Has anyone had any luck getting [pd~] subprocesses working from within > libpd? > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] [pd~] subprocess in libpd ?
Has anyone had any luck getting [pd~] subprocesses working from within libpd? ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
