Ah. Ok. Thank you gentlemen. I will explore switch~.
Cheers
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021, 5:37 PM Alexandre Torres Porres
wrote:
> Em sex., 22 de jan. de 2021 às 20:20, Andrew Lyons
> escreveu:
>
>> Alternatively, I was wondering if it was possible to load a different
>> patch upon input of a certain
Em sex., 22 de jan. de 2021 às 20:20, Andrew Lyons
escreveu:
> Alternatively, I was wondering if it was possible to load a different
> patch upon input of a certain midi program change?
>
you can use special pd messages to open patches and stuff, but what you'd
rather do is have them all
Try [switch~] to turn off dsp in the subpatch(es) ala:
[ 0 (
|
[switch~]
You might need to add a small delay and ramp to avoid clicking.
> On Jan 23, 2021, at 12:19 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote:
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:11:22 -0800
> From: Andrew Lyons
I was wondering if it was possible to cease processing sections of a
patch somehow?
Have a look at the [switch~] object ;-)
On 23.01.2021 00:11, Andrew Lyons wrote:
Hi,
I have a headless raspberry pi that boots into a PD patch I created.
(I control it with a midi wind controller and an FCB
Hi,
I have a headless raspberry pi that boots into a PD patch I created. (I
control it with a midi wind controller and an FCB 1010 midi foot
controller.) I have observed that bypassing certain sections of the patch
with MIDI signals generated by the foot pedal board does not actually stop
those
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 23:14 +0100, Christof Ressi wrote:
> > [netreceive] reports the source address for received data only
> > for TCP connections, but not for UDP
> [netreceive -u -f] works just fine for me on Pd 0.51 ;-)
Ah, the -f flag. Thanks for correcting me!
Roman
signature.asc
[netreceive] reports the source address for received data only
for TCP connections, but not for UDP
[netreceive -u -f] works just fine for me on Pd 0.51 ;-)
Christof
On 22.01.2021 22:52, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Hi João
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 19:41 +0100, João Pais wrote:
I wanted to check if
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 22:52 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Hi João
>
>
> On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 19:41 +0100, João Pais wrote:
> > I wanted to check if there are any new methods to get one's own ip
> > from Pd - that is, so that a user doesn't go check the system
> > settings.
>
> I need that,
Hi João
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 19:41 +0100, João Pais wrote:
> I wanted to check if there are any new methods to get one's own ip
> from Pd - that is, so that a user doesn't go check the system
> settings.
I need that, too, and I can't wrap my head around figuring out how to
do it. Using a
Hi,
I wanted to check if there are any new methods to get one's own ip
from Pd
Are you talking about the local IP address or your public IP address?
I read somewhere that 255.255.255.255 was also for broadcast, but
since it's not working I imagine I read wrong.
255.255.255.255 is indeed
Hi list,
I wanted to check if there are any new methods to get one's own ip from
Pd - that is, so that a user doesn't go check the system settings. It
would be necessary for all windows, macos and linux. Older messages talk
about using [shell] in unix systems, and some hack with a batch file
Em sex., 22 de jan. de 2021 às 01:35, Alexandre Torres Porres <
por...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> There's the "morphing" or "interpolation" thing that I may be
> still neglecting and thinking that using things "line" objects is just as
> fine, but let's see. I'll also look into how max does
12 matches
Mail list logo
