Re: [PD] Symbol atom showing backslashes

On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 00:03 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 1/25/21 11:20 PM, Christof Ressi wrote: > > The display of the escaping backslash is certainly a bug... I > > thought > > there already was a bug report. If not, would you file one? ;-) > > you mean

Re: [PD] Symbol atom showing backslashes

On 1/25/21 11:20 PM, Christof Ressi wrote: The display of the escaping backslash is certainly a bug... I thought there already was a bug report. If not, would you file one? ;-) you mean https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/824? the discussion relevant to this topic seems to be at the

Re: [PD] Symbol atom showing backslashes

The display of the escaping backslash is certainly a bug... I thought there already was a bug report. If not, would you file one? ;-) On 25.01.2021 22:43, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: Em seg., 25 de jan. de 2021 às 17:47, Roman Haefeli mailto:reduz...@gmail.com>> escreveu: I think it

Re: [PD] Symbol atom showing backslashes

Em seg., 25 de jan. de 2021 às 17:47, Roman Haefeli escreveu: > I think it got introduced in 0.51, btw. but the escape mechanism was always there, I can see it in Pd Extended 0.42 that it escapes \$0, I guess it got "fixed" and expanded to all cases recently. > Is there a reason why symbol

Re: [PD] Symbol atom showing backslashes

On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 21:44 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Hi all > > Is there a reason why symbol atoms add a backslash in front of > spaces? > Why is the display showing the escape mechanism? I think it got introduced in 0.51, btw. Roman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

[PD] Symbol atom showing backslashes

Hi all Is there a reason why symbol atoms add a backslash in front of spaces? Why is the display showing the escape mechanism? Roman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: [PD] lookup table for midi usage

to answer my own question, after some more search i stumbled on: contour from the context library, it should do what i want! thanks liam! > On 25 Jan 2021, at 20:04, Simon Iten wrote: > > hello there, > > not strictly PD related, but (computer) music in general. > > i am trying to

[PD] lookup table for midi usage

hello there, not strictly PD related, but (computer) music in general. i am trying to generate a 500 point look-up table in the range 0 to 127 (for midi usage) with the following shape: is there a tool for something like this? it is basically pseudo exponentially rising in the first 125

Re: [PD] [clone] settable instance number?

It would be quite useful to be able to do that. For now the only workaround is to allocate the maximum number of voices, and switch off audio/data to the ones that aren't active. Hi, > > how would I be able to set [clone]'s instance number, currently an > argument, using a message? I am trying

Re: [PD] [clone] settable instance number?

* Christof Ressi [2021-01-25 13:28]: > So far, it's not possible (without dynamic patching), but there's a WIP PR > which I should probably reactivate: > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1069 Yes, please reactivate! DSP switching itself is not so much of an issue as you say yourself in

Re: [PD] [clone] settable instance number?

So far, it's not possible (without dynamic patching), but there's a WIP PR which I should probably reactivate: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1069 In the meantime, just set the maximum number of instances you would possibly need and then deactivate the ones you don't need (e.g.

[PD] [clone] settable instance number?

Hi, how would I be able to set [clone]'s instance number, currently an argument, using a message? I am trying to create voices dynamically, which furthermore would introduce clicks, but make the number of voices dependent on some other conditions/calculations in an abstraction at creation time.