The plan is to continue to maintain & release, though depending on the changes
that get in I imagine there won't be much motivation for people to use it.
I might keep adding reasonable PRs that are patch-compatible with vanilla as
they come up though (aside from adding initbang & closebang, and
Em qua., 6 de out. de 2021 às 17:14, Sebastian Shader
escreveu:
> by these definitions it is also a very "minor" fork
>
as "minor" as it can be :) not that I don't think this is ain't nice
> as all of the changes are basically contained in a few open PRs for
> vanilla (except for the logo).
>
Well, I do think a fair amount of people are adopting pd-next mainly for being
able to set colors. For instance I think a few people are using it for teaching
(and so their students use it) due in part to being able to visually
distinguish between signal and message inlets and outlets.
Em qua., 6 de out. de 2021 às 12:41, IOhannes m zmoelnig
escreveu:
> > Anyway, other than that and generally speaking, Pd Extended was
> > kinda of a "minor" fork. Another similar example of such a "minor fork"
> is
> > Pd Ceammc. It has similar characteristics like offering a different UI
> and
I'm now forking the thread :)
Em qua., 6 de out. de 2021 às 12:41, IOhannes m zmoelnig
escreveu:
> On 10/6/21 4:46 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> > Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but as I see it, Pd-Extended started as a
> > "distro", then it evolved to a proper fork with
On 10/6/21 4:46 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but as I see it, Pd-Extended started as a
"distro", then it evolved to a proper fork with parallel/independent
development.
not really.
Pd-extended was *always* closely related to the development of
Pd-vanilla,
Le 06/10/2021 à 16:46, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
hmmm, I thought there was a pretty simple and straightforward and "universal" definition of a fork, which would be
basically a parallel (independent) development. Maybe there's just no "official scientific definition"? Wikipedia
Only thing i can say is to confirm that Spaghettis IS a fork.
- Mail d'origine -
De: IOhannes m zmoelnig
À: pd-list@lists.iem.at
Envoyé: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 10:56:07 +0200 (CEST)
Objet: Re: [PD] list of Pd forks?
On 10/5/21 4:12 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>
> That's it, right? Did
alex listed "pd-extended" as one of the well-known forks.
but what constitutes the forkiness in this case?
apparently not the large number of externals shipped (as this would
make it as "distro"), but something else.
from the top of my head (as I never was a Pd-extended user myself),
two
I have a fork for macOS which adds an event loop for better VST plugin
integration:
https://github.com/Spacechild1/pure-data/releases/tag/v0.51.1-eventloop
However, I doubt that anyone uses it, so I'm not sure it's worth listing :-)
Christof
On 05.10.2021 04:12, Alexandre Torres Porres
electronic art forked pd to became the audio engine of a game (spore). I don't
know the name of the fork since it was not public.
Other company have probably done the same without advertising it.
cheers
Le 05/10/2021 à 04:12, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
hi folks, I'm writing a text
On 10/5/21 4:12 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
That's it, right? Did I miss something?
github lists 172 "forks" (in the github-meaning of the word).
it seems that none of them have bothered to change the name, so the
repos are still called "pure-data"
"many" (but it's hard to give actual
On 10/6/21 10:16 AM, Christof Ressi wrote:
FWIW, I wouldn't consider pd-iem a fork, either. IMO, adding a bunch of
plugins doesn't qualify as a fork. I think a better word would be
"distro". Actually, that's how the project describes itself:
"is a Pure Data libraries distribution for plain
FWIW, I wouldn't consider pd-iem a fork, either. IMO, adding a bunch of
plugins doesn't qualify as a fork. I think a better word would be
"distro". Actually, that's how the project describes itself:
"is a Pure Data libraries distribution for plain Pure Data (Pd-vanilla),
focussed on (but not
On 10/5/21 4:12 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
hi folks, I'm writing a text about Pd's history and I want to get things
right. I'm mentioning Pd forks and woulldn't like to miss any, but then
some might be not worth mentioning? I don't, here's what I know and have
- DesireData
- Pd Extended
On 10/6/21 2:33 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Em ter., 5 de out. de 2021 às 19:12, IOhannes m zmölnig
escreveu:
so what's you definition of a "fork"?
A modification of the source code to reflect different features. If I
but the "pd-iem" has all kinds of different features, e.g. you
16 matches
Mail list logo
