Re: [PD] A strange question (yet again)

2022-01-20 Thread João Pais
- if the spectrogram + audio aren't triggered that often, one way would be to use a background of canvas objects, each with 1x1 pixels. This sounds very exotic, I did it in jmmmp/pix2canvas to "copy-paste" pictures into a Pd patch. I was trying to do a x-y joystick that way when I did it, so

Re: [PD] A strange question (yet again)

2022-01-20 Thread Pierre Alexandre Tremblay
> Do you have a Pd patch somewhere to have a look at? I’ll tidy up what I have but it is exactly this: > - if the spectrogram + audio aren't triggered that often, one way would be to > use a background of canvas objects, each with 1x1 pixels. This sounds very > exotic, I did it in

Re: [PD] A strange question (yet again)

2022-01-20 Thread João Pais
An array of data structure rectangles doesn't sound that bad. Why are you looking for another way? Because if I have a spectrogram of 400 pixels by 200 pixels, the struct drawing was taxing the machine quite a lot. Actually 100 smaller than that it was taxing the machine… But maybe I got

Re: [PD] A strange question (yet again)

2022-01-20 Thread Pierre Alexandre Tremblay
Ok this is a spectroscope (thanks again, this is amazing to see some much more advanced Pd mastery than mine) But I’m looking for a spectrogram (where each pixed of a 2D graph is as dark as the loudness of that position (usually time in the x axis and freq in the y axis). The search continues

Re: [PD] A strange question (yet again)

2022-01-20 Thread Lucas Cordiviola
On 1/20/2022 5:17 PM, Pierre Alexandre Tremblay wrote: Btw I don’t know if my previous reply with picture attachements made it to the list Yes it did. at least i could see them. -- Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. ___

Re: [PD] A strange question (yet again)

2022-01-20 Thread Pierre Alexandre Tremblay
Wow thanks, I’ll try it now. Btw I don’t know if my previous reply with picture attachements made it to the list, if not I’ll reply again with a link… p > On 20 Jan 2022, at 18:31, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > I have a vanilla spectroscope abstraction: g_spectroscope. It's pretty simple > and

Re: [PD] A strange question (yet again)

2022-01-20 Thread Dan Wilcox
I have a vanilla spectroscope abstraction: g_spectroscope. It's pretty simple and good enough for showing a graph, not really for scientific precision. There are also update & dimension controls plus you can turn it off to save CPU. https://github.com/danomatika/rc-patches/tree/master/rc

Re: [PD] A strange question (yet again)

2022-01-20 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 16:46 +, Pierre Alexandre Tremblay wrote: > Sorry again for my obsessions with pd-vanilla which makes everything > harder - this one might be impossible! > > I’m trying to draw a spectrogram in pd-vanilla to match our waveform > visualisation options in FluCoMa for Max

[PD] A strange question (yet again)

2022-01-20 Thread Pierre Alexandre Tremblay
Sorry again for my obsessions with pd-vanilla which makes everything harder - this one might be impossible! I’m trying to draw a spectrogram in pd-vanilla to match our waveform visualisation options in FluCoMa for Max and SuperCollider. I saw the example with the peaks in the documentation,

Re: [PD] vline for messages?

2022-01-20 Thread José de Abreu
If you mean to use the syntax of vline like [1 100, 0 50 100 ( to schedule lines to happen and etc, you can do this in a similar way using a combination of [pipe f f 0] and line. But note that you are forced to put the delay of the first message to zero, for that trick to work, so instead of [1

[PD] vline for messages?

2022-01-20 Thread Peter P.
excuse me if this has been asked before, but is there something like a vline for messages? thanks! ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list