hmm - worked fine to run existing .dsp demo files for me. but at that time
i was on a Mac with High Sierra, haven't tried it on Apple Silicon with
Monterey or higher. it's been a while but maybe you're not meant to
actively code it in PD, just run the patches.
best,
scott
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at
I'd make a transfer function in the style of waveshaping and use the audio
you want to draw to read it and display the output.
It should not be more computationally expensive than a wavetable oscillator.
Best,
J
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022, 06:44 IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 10/10/22 12:21,
Em dom., 9 de out. de 2022 às 21:11, Scott R. Looney
escreveu:
> as i recall Albert Graef updated it recently. it's called faustgen2~ i
> believe:
>
> https://github.com/agraef/pd-faustgen
>
doesn't seem to work well on vanilla :/ I can't open the code box
ceammc also has another faust
On 10/10/22 12:21, jayrope wrote:
A quick question:
In Vanilla, is it possible to bias solely the display of a waveform in
an array in such a manner, that lower volumes visibly appear louder than
they are?
logarithmic scale on the y-axis (or x-axis, for spectral info)?
i'm afraid, the answer
A quick question:
In Vanilla, is it possible to bias solely the display of a waveform in
an array in such a manner, that lower volumes visibly appear louder than
they are?
Or can i only do that by copying the data into a second array and
altering such data to fit my display needs?
Very dynamic
hi.
no soluteion, just a quick comment:
On 10/9/22 10:16, Ingo wrote:
I have already spent countless hours in replacing number boxes and faders
with using canvases on top of the number boxes and faders.
this will actually make things worse!
from Pd's POV, you are now showing a number box
I have no experience with Pi - is running them on GEM an option?
Or a downsampled array display, depending on how much detail you need.
Am So., 9. Okt. 2022 um 18:19 Uhr schrieb Dan Wilcox :
> Before you rewrite the whole thing, maybe it's a bug on the platform...?
>
> Another option is not to
