Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 5/11/23 19:32, Dan Wilcox wrote: I can't find the commit for this, f0a3a0c621dacc1f617cf07b38d8dc563703d12e fdmsa IOhannes OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 5/11/23 16:53, William Huston wrote: Come to think of it, I think we've had this conversation before, years ago. I guess I just keep needing to be reminded of the PD Paradigm. i wouldn't call it "the Pd Paradigm". i would like it to be *the* Pd paradigm, but I think there's evidence that

Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread Dan Wilcox
Howdy all, there is a changelog fr sorts included with the HTML docs. For Pd 0.46, it says: "Bug fixes to IEM GUIs: sliders and radio buttons pass floating-point numbers through without limiting them to the GUI's range or resolution. Also, the toggle no longer resets its "value" (the nonzero

Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread Antoine Rousseau
FYI, it's still possible to restore the previous (clipped) behaviour by adding "-compatibility 0.45" to the startup flags. It's not possible to simply go back, it would probably break a lot of the patches that have been written since Pd 0.46 (around 2014). Antoine Le jeu. 11 mai 2023 à 17:11,

Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 16:54 +0200, Christof Ressi wrote: > > I think we should generally follow the principle of least surprise. +1 Roman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list

Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread Christof Ressi
it's super-simple to just add a [clip 0 127] (or whatever) before or after the slider to achieve the behavior you are looking after. The problem is that now you have to make sure that these two ranges always stay in sync. (It is easy to accidentally change one while keeping the other.) that

Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 5/11/23 14:30, William Huston wrote: Joao, IIRC, some objects in pd-extended, like hsliders, would always respect the limits whether dialed-in, or when coming from an input. When i finally switched to vanilla, I noticed the same thing, limits were not respected on the inputs, and a lot of

Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread William Huston
Joao, IIRC, some objects in pd-extended, like hsliders, would always respect the limits whether dialed-in, or when coming from an input. When i finally switched to vanilla, I noticed the same thing, limits were not respected on the inputs, and a lot of my patches broke. I don't know whether the

Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread Ico Bukvic
Pd-L2Ork offers this as a user-settable property. Best, Ico -- Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Director, Creativity + Innovation Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology Virginia Tech Creative Technologies in Music School of Performing Arts – 0141 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139

Re: [PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread Peter P.
* João Pais [2023-05-11 09:18]: > Hello list, > > after all this time, I just noticed something which I'm not sure if it was > always like that or it changed without me noticing it: in atom boxes one can > define the lower/upper limits, which work when dragging with the mouse, but > don't work

[PD] Number atom box limits overstepped

2023-05-11 Thread João Pais
Hello list, after all this time, I just noticed something which I'm not sure if it was always like that or it changed without me noticing it: in atom boxes one can define the lower/upper limits, which work when dragging with the mouse, but don't work when inputting a number or sending a