wauw! exactly, you scratched my brain in a very pleasant way :)
On Wed, May 27, 2015, at 06:30 PM, patrice colet wrote:
Le 25/05/2015 21:40, jamal crawford a écrit :
openGL is doing this, maybe you should use Gem for your interface?
not maybe, but absolutently! but i think the
hey
Very important, you don't get mouse control of the encapsulated array,
only of the top one. Maybe you should say exactly why you think you need
encapsulated arrays. If it's to draw a canvas/box, you can do that in the
same template as your main array.
I thought that the encapsulated
hey
As far as order-- in Pd-l2ork I made a revision so that a struct will
simply refuse to create if you give it an array field with a nonexistent
template for the data.
neat :)
Also-- in a _single_ scalar, the shapes will be drawn using the order that
you created the drawing commands. So if
Le 25/05/2015 21:40, jamal crawford a écrit :
openGL is doing this, maybe you should use Gem for your interface?
not maybe, but absolutently! but i think the copy/paste/delete function
in the drawing window and scalar-editing are quite usefull to me. just
having the window stick on top of
many people already gave replies to the questions, so I leave the example
of array encapsulation from my data structures workshop.
Very important, you don't get mouse control of the encapsulated array,
only of the top one. Maybe you should say exactly why you think you need
encapsulated
On 05/25/2015 03:40 PM, jamal crawford wrote:
hey and thanks for the reply
...there is a bug since the very begining of puredata, if you don't
delete data and modify your structure pd will crash
word!
also I think this is not a good idea to draw arrays within arrays,
because bindings
hello, I didn't try yet pd-0.46 but with pd-0.45 it should be the same
thing...
Le 24/05/2015 14:29, jamal crawford a écrit :
hey List
0.
I try to create an rarray within an array, but every time I try to type
[struct array arrayWithin arrayWithin-template] in arrays template (both
before and
hey and thanks for the reply
...there is a bug since the very begining of puredata, if you don't
delete data and modify your structure pd will crash
word!
also I think this is not a good idea to draw arrays within arrays,
because bindings doesn't work anymore within arrays
so you mean I
Just tried this in 0.46 (actually, tried
[struct foo array arrayWithin arrayWithin-template]) and Pd didn't crash
(although I think it was easy to crash Pd 0.45 making arrays with
undefined templates). But it's very confusing to get around such a data
structure and I can't figure out how to
