Re: [PD] Mailing list archive search: Remove attachment.htm results?
* IOhannes m zmoelnig [2024-04-23 12:06]: > On 4/23/24 08:56, Peter P. wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The search function on https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list// > > is great, but a large number of search results are of the form > > "/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160527/3e480100/attachment.html" > > and are more or less unreadable. > > > > I would like to suggest to exclude them from the indexing or from the > > results if possible. > > > what you are seeing is emails that come with both HTML and plaintext. > > typically, a mail-client that composes HTML mail, will include the same > information in a plaintext part of the email. but there's not really > anything enforcing this (if you are usually reading plaintext emails, you > will know this "you need an HTML-capable mail client to read this" message) Thanks, indeed known to me. > as such, i do not think there's anything wrong with including the HTML parts > (even if they are rendered verbatim) in the search results, as they might > contain information otherwise unavailable. The main issue is, that I don't get the email's subject for the HTML emails, do you? > in any case, i'm afraid this is rather low priority. I don't know. It renders about 50% of the results useless, at least to me, and even more so to less experienced users. > in the meantime you could try filtering out the HTML attachments by > excluding some html tag (e.g. adding ` -div ` to the search terms helps for > me; however, this will also exclude mails that discuss the use of [div]...) Thanks, will try this bit of inside knowledge! best, Peter ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Mailing list archive search: Remove attachment.htm results?
On 4/23/24 08:56, Peter P. wrote: Hi, The search function on https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list// is great, but a large number of search results are of the form "/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160527/3e480100/attachment.html" and are more or less unreadable. I would like to suggest to exclude them from the indexing or from the results if possible. what you are seeing is emails that come with both HTML and plaintext. typically, a mail-client that composes HTML mail, will include the same information in a plaintext part of the email. but there's not really anything enforcing this (if you are usually reading plaintext emails, you will know this "you need an HTML-capable mail client to read this" message) as such, i do not think there's anything wrong with including the HTML parts (even if they are rendered verbatim) in the search results, as they might contain information otherwise unavailable. however, what is definitely wrong is that the "sort by relevance" does not really do what it promises. at least i get HTML-attachments with a relevance of 73% sorted before the plaintext posts with 100% relevance. in any case, i'm afraid this is rather low priority. in the meantime you could try filtering out the HTML attachments by excluding some html tag (e.g. adding ` -div ` to the search terms helps for me; however, this will also exclude mails that discuss the use of [div]...) msfdgasdr IOhannes OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Mailing list archive search: Remove attachment.htm results?
Hi, The search function on https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list// is great, but a large number of search results are of the form "/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160527/3e480100/attachment.html" and are more or less unreadable. I would like to suggest to exclude them from the indexing or from the results if possible. cheersz, Peter ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
