> so one from the new millenium: locking a network ressource (e.g. an
gigabit IP-camera that saturates the the network once it's told to start
delivering frames).
What happens currently if you click in the terminal on a Pd
instance that's using that network resource?
Is LB_PANIC a public interfac
On 01/19/2016 10:00 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2016-01-19 00:42, Miller Puckette wrote:
>> > OK... the support should be in git
> thank you very much.
ok.
so the new and shiny iemguts-0.2 [1] features both [initbang] and
[closebang].
these will magically start working as soon as use Pd>
On 2016-01-19 20:59, Miller Puckette wrote:
> Sort of. I think it's a bad idea to go through and close all the windows
> (sometimes closing a window takes time) - but just send objects a message
> in case they need to get off some resource.
i'm not really interesting about "closing windows".
wha
Sort of. I think it's a bad idea to go through and close all the windows
(sometimes closing a window takes time) - but just send objects a message
in case they need to get off some resource. I don't have any examples to
hand, except a rather lame one: sending an all-notes-off message to some MIDI
On 01/19/2016 08:35 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
>> Next: for people who are trying to close OS resources when Pd quits, I'm
> thinking there should be a fourth phase, "LB_PANIC", which objects should
> not respond to by passing messages but only closing resources.
> What's a situation wh
> Next: for people who are trying to close OS resources when Pd quits, I'm
thinking there should be a fourth phase, "LB_PANIC", which objects should
not respond to by passing messages but only closing resources.
What's a situation where Pd currently won't close its resources upon quitting?
-Jonath
+ 1
Some behaviour congruent with POSIX signals
has always been on my wishlist. Those (admittedly
rare) occasions when some unrecoverable IO blockage
happens it would be nice to rescue the patch.
cheers,
Andy
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:22:13AM -0800, Miller Puckette wrote:
> Good, thanks.
>
Good, thanks.
Next: for people who are trying to close OS resources when Pd quits, I'm
thinking there should be a fourth phase, "LB_PANIC", which objects should
not respond to by passing messages but only closing resources.
cheers
Miller
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:07:32PM +0100, IOhannes m zmöln
On 01/19/2016 10:00 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> a first test with iemlib's [init] exhibits triggers on initbang and
> loadbang, but not on closebang...i might miss something though
found the culprit: canvas_closebang() never gets called when deleting an
abstraction.
attached patch fixes this
On 2016-01-19 00:42, Miller Puckette wrote:
> OK... the support should be in git
thank you very much.
while i find the API very elegant, i have one question: will existing
externals with loadbang functionality now start banging three times
during their life-cycle?
a first test with iemlib's [ini
ang running in vanilla. Should we expect to see this by the next
> release?
>
> From: brbrof...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:00:48 -0500
> Subject: Re: [PD] closebang and initbang in Vanilla
> To: m...@ucsd.edu
> CC: jancs...@yahoo.com; liamg...@hotmail.com; pd-list
Thanks for the positive response here--it will make me extremely happy to have
initbang running in vanilla. Should we expect to see this by the next release?
From: brbrof...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:00:48 -0500
Subject: Re: [PD] closebang and initbang in Vanilla
To: m...@ucsd.edu
CC
pping the loadbang than starting it. If you
> > >> have a patch that dynamically creates itself (or worse deletes
> itself) when
> > >> loaded, it is very useful to be able to inspect the patch without the
> the
> > >> process starting. Initbang provides
On 01/13/2016 10:32 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> Here's an idea... I could just patch Pd to make it possible for externs to
> do that. That wouldn't bother me (I'm horrified by hte design of 'initbang'
> but don't mind if someone else is maintaining it :)
cool, count me in.
please provide possibi
dbang than starting it. If you
> >> have a patch that dynamically creates itself (or worse deletes itself) when
> >> loaded, it is very useful to be able to inspect the patch without the the
> >> process starting. Initbang provides this because it bangs only when the
> >
be able to inspect the patch without the the
>> process starting. Initbang provides this because it bangs only when the
>> patch is loaded as an abstraction, not when the patch is opened.
>>
>>
>> > Message: 3
>> > Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:41:41 +0100
&
it bangs only when the patch is loaded as an abstraction, not
> > > when it is opened. This is really useful for dynamic patching.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> Message: 3
> > >> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:31:36 + (UTC)
> > >> From: J
> >
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:31:36 + (UTC)
> >> From: Jonathan Wilkes
> >> To: Roman Haefeli , "pd-list@lists.iem.at"
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: [PD] closebang and initbang in Vanilla
> >>
n the patch is loaded
as an abstraction, not when the patch is opened.
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:41:41 +0100
> From: Jack
> To: pd-list@lists.iem.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] closebang and initbang in Vanilla
> Message-ID: <56936ac5.6030...@rybn.org>
> Content
lly useful for dynamic patching.
>
>
>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:31:36 + (UTC)
>> From: Jonathan Wilkes
>> To: Roman Haefeli , "pd-list@lists.iem.at"
>>
>> Subject: Re: [PD] closebang and initbang in Vanilla
>> Messag
3
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:31:36 + (UTC)
> From: Jonathan Wilkes
> To: Roman Haefeli , "pd-list@lists.iem.at"
>
> Subject: Re: [PD] closebang and initbang in Vanilla
> Message-ID:
> <355667468.2920260.1452432696797.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.
They are also in Pd-l2ork.
On Sunday, January 10, 2016 6:36 AM, Roman Haefeli
wrote:
On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 09:52 +, Liam Goodacre wrote:
> Which libraries are [closebang] and [initbang] in? They don't seem to
> load in Vanilla and I can't find the relevant information in the
> help
On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 09:52 +, Liam Goodacre wrote:
> Which libraries are [closebang] and [initbang] in? They don't seem to
> load in Vanilla and I can't find the relevant information in the
> helpfiles so that I can use [declare].
I'm not totally sure, but I believe those are part of the Pd-e
Which libraries are [closebang] and [initbang] in? They don't seem to load in
Vanilla and I can't find the relevant information in the helpfiles so that I
can use [declare].
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
24 matches
Mail list logo
