Em ter., 19 de abr. de 2022 às 08:13, IOhannes m zmoelnig
escreveu:
> could you provide the full (related) output of the Pd-console, when it
> tries (and fails) to load the i386 binary?
It doesn't try and fail, it actually finds the fat binary first and then
fails loading it.. it never gets to
On 4/19/22 13:11, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
1. i *think*, on macOS Pd should first try to load the arch-specific
extensions (`.d_i386`), and only then it should fall back to loading the
fat binary (`.d_fat`).
obviously it doesn't do that [1] right now.
in the meantime, you could try to force
On 4/17/22 19:14, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
So, yeah, doesn't seem possible, but I'm still not sure yet, and other
than, it seems I can't mix in the download a fat binary (with 64/arm) along
with some other binary for 32 bits (darwin or 'd_i386'). If I'm using Pd 32
bits it won't be able
On 4/17/22 19:14, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Em sáb., 16 de abr. de 2022 às 23:26, Alexandre Torres Porres <
por...@gmail.com> escreveu:
I wondered if I could build a fat binary for 32/64 bits and arm, but I can
forget about it, right?
So, yeah, doesn't seem possible, but I'm still not
Em sáb., 16 de abr. de 2022 às 23:26, Alexandre Torres Porres <
por...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> I wondered if I could build a fat binary for 32/64 bits and arm, but I can
> forget about it, right?
>
So, yeah, doesn't seem possible, but I'm still not sure yet, and other
than, it seems I can't mix
