Re: [PD] unexpected [array max] and [array min] behavior

Thanks again. Can you confirm that a range with onset greater than n-1 should be empty, and not a range with just the (n-1) item? I'm building some abstractions with these, and I want range behavior to be consistent with those in the [array] objects. Thanks! M On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 7:50 PM,

Re: [PD] unexpected [array max] and [array min] behavior

Yep, that sounds like the correct way to interpret it. I've attempted a fix, now up on git repo. Thanks again for flagging this M On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 08:18:31PM -0400, Matt Barber wrote: > Thanks again. Can you confirm that a range with onset greater than n-1 > should be empty, and not a

Re: [PD] unexpected [array max] and [array min] behavior

Thanks for the fix in 0.46.7. There are a couple more subtle problems having to do with bounds checking (one of which may be there by design). Bounds checking occurs in the function array_rangeop_getrange() starting line 536: firstitem = x->x_onset; if (firstitem < 0) firstitem =

Re: [PD] unexpected [array max] and [array min] behavior

Thanks. I meant to say that there was the same problem in [array min], but you probably caught it in your fix. Best, Matt On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Miller Puckette wrote: > Yep... thanks. Fixed in git - may take some time for me to get out a new > compiled version

Re: [PD] unexpected [array max] and [array min] behavior

Yep :) M On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 07:46:30PM -0400, Matt Barber wrote: > Thanks. > > I meant to say that there was the same problem in [array min], but you > probably caught it in your fix. > > Best, > > Matt > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Miller Puckette wrote: > > >

[PD] unexpected [array max] and [array min] behavior

Hi list, I've been playing around with the new(ish) [array] object suite in vanilla 0.46.6. Forgive me if this is already a known issue, but it looks like the min and max arguments aren't working properly. The second inlet (setting the number of points to search) works as expected. The first

Re: [PD] unexpected [array max] and [array min] behavior

Yep... thanks. Fixed in git - may take some time for me to get out a new compiled version (other stuff to fix too :) M On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:51:15PM -0400, Matt Barber wrote: > Hi list, > > I've been playing around with the new(ish) [array] object suite in vanilla > 0.46.6. Forgive me if