Re: [PD] Randomly coloured particles

2012-01-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-01-02 22:57, Antonio Roberts wrote: Can anyone enlighten me on how you would use [part_info] together with [color] to generate randomly coloured particles, with each particle having a randomly generated colour? instead of connecting the

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.43-1 test7 (!) available

2012-01-03 Thread cyrille henry
Le 28/12/2011 06:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit : apt-get install puredata-dev when compiling pd from source? cheers C .hc On Dec 27, 2011, at 1:58 PM, cyrille henry wrote: hello, yes, you're right, my problem have noting to do with pd version. it was only the makefile that did

Re: [PD] porting vade shaders collection to Pd

2012-01-03 Thread cyrille henry
Le 30/12/2011 12:59, Marco Donnarumma a écrit : ok, what's the correct way to update the help-files? Just edit them and submit somewhere? yes. but please use the gem-dev mailing list for discussion about gem development. Cheers Cyrille cheers, M On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:12 PM,

Re: [PD] porting vade shaders collection to Pd

2012-01-03 Thread Marco Donnarumma
Thanks Cyrille, Ok, will move on the gem-dev. M On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:31 AM, cyrille henry c...@chnry.net wrote: Le 30/12/2011 12:59, Marco Donnarumma a écrit : ok, what's the correct way to update the help-files? Just edit them and submit somewhere? yes. but please use the

[PD] puredata.org not available

2012-01-03 Thread rolf meesters
hello list, a good and fruitfull 2012 to you all since yesterday i'm not able to reach the Pd website it's 'connecting' forever without any visibility is it only me or is it somehow down? rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] puredata.org not available

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
Le 2012-01-03 à 16:58:00, rolf meesters a écrit : since yesterday i'm not able to reach the Pd website it's 'connecting' forever without any visibility is it only me or is it somehow down? It's down, but the webserver is still ostensibly up, because http://lists.puredata.info points to the

Re: [PD] puredata.org not available

2012-01-03 Thread Björn Eriksson
Here from Sweden http://www.puredata.info accesible now! Maybe a glitch in the networks? /Björn Eriksson On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: Le 2012-01-03 à 16:58:00, rolf meesters a écrit : since yesterday i'm not able to reach the Pd website it's

Re: [PD] puredata.org not available

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
Le 2012-01-03 à 18:47:00, Björn Eriksson a écrit : Here from Sweden http://www.puredata.info accesible now! Maybe a glitch in the networks? Oh yes, it is now. I didn't verify at the time of writing that mail, which was basically copying something I had said on the chat yesterday.

[PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread servando barreiro
I just readed this :  The electronic processing must be developed and implemented using Max/MSP or Kyma. (we will not accept patches developed in Pure Data or SuperCollider). here: http://www.bek.no/posts/243-call-for-works-sonic-screens-2012?locale=en bad thing...

Re: [PD] pd64 debian lots of errors

2012-01-03 Thread Billy Stiltner
things get chunky when your byte gets bigger ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Interesting-- I've never seen something like that where proprietary software that costs money is a requirement for entry. Let's just call it stupidity and move on. -Jonathan From: servando barreiro servandi...@yahoo.es To: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread Miller Puckette
Ugly. I'd suggest using Max and the pd~ object :) Miller On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:29:42PM +, servando barreiro wrote: I just readed this :  The electronic processing must be developed and implemented using Max/MSP or Kyma. (we will not accept patches developed in Pure Data or

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread
in my opinion conciously or unconciously, one of the most counterrevolutionary call4 ive seen in the last times salut x! 2012/1/3 Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu: Ugly. I'd suggest using Max and the pd~ object :) Miller On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:29:42PM +, servando barreiro wrote:

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
- Original Message - From: Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu To: servando barreiro servandi...@yahoo.es Cc: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 2:48 PM Subject: Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF Ugly. I'd suggest using Max and the pd~ object :) Ha!  I forgot that

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Actually I'd love to collaborate on a submission for this with someone. But we'd have to be crafty because you have to submit your patch to them. -Jonathan - Original Message - From: Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu To: servando barreiro servandi...@yahoo.es Cc: pd-list@iem.at

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread APO33
woow I can't believe this!! it is a clear message against piksel (used to be part of BEK) free software, specifically against some of the most creative ones!!! totally absurd, call for boycott!! or use pd~ object in max as miller said :-D cheers julien in my opinion conciously or

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread Björn Eriksson
Had to visit the link to see what it was all about... it´s easy to just have some fast opinion on things... and the first impression I had was that this was something BEK (in Norway) arranges, but it´s a call made on their blog from Milan/Rome for something happening in Italy.

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread Pagano, Patrick
Sounds like someone got a new kyma system... -Original Message- From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of Björn Eriksson Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:46 PM To: Pd - list Subject: Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF Had to visit the link to see what it was all

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread APO33
Hey Björn, you right on that one! mea culpa :-) cheers Julien call made on their blog from Milan/Rome for something happening in Italy. http://usoproject.blogspot.com/ . All the best, Björn Eriksson On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:15 PM, APO33 i...@apo33.org wrote: woow I can't believe

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread András Murányi
I thought it would be easiest to ask the guys behind the submission address (submissi...@synesthesiarecordings.com). Not that i got a real answer. If you have an idea how to follow up, I'm interested. Andras -- Forwarded message -- From: Federico Placidi

Re: [PD] no pd??

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
Le 2012-01-03 à 11:47:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit : Interesting-- I've never seen something like that where proprietary software that costs money is a requirement for entry. Let's just call it stupidity and move on. Well, it would be fine if it just had MAX in the name of the contest : then

Re: [PD] no pd??

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
Le 2012-01-03 à 18:29:00, servando barreiro a écrit : I just readed this :  The electronic processing must be developed and implemented using Max/MSP or Kyma. (we will not accept patches developed in Pure Data or SuperCollider). I wrote to inquire about it and I got told : « there is no

Re: [PD] no pd??

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
Le 2012-01-03 à 13:05:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit : Ha!  I forgot that [pd~] works in Max. That would be _really_ funny if a Pd'er snuck into this like that! Don't you think that the way the rules are stated, using [pd~] in MAX would also be forbidden ? What's not clear in the following

Re: [PD] no pd??

2012-01-03 Thread Richie Cyngler
I don't think you're follow the intention. The intention of using [pd~] in Max would be to subvert the intentions of the organisers, because their policy is exclusive for no apparent reason. At least that is my take on it. On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:

Re: [PD] PD-Launch videos + Miller Puckette's 20-lecture puredata video course??

2012-01-03 Thread Epic Jefferson
Any word on the videos' progress? On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:49 AM, TAD BISAHA tadbis...@gmail.com wrote: ** Hi all, Thank you for this precision, Miller. Consequently, Epic and the other interested people, you have the choice ( that sounds good) between probing your patience or misusing

Re: [PD] no pd??

2012-01-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Exactly.  You'd essentially write the same patch twice-- once completely in Max, and if it gets accepted then with Pd and wrap it in a [pd~] object. OR: In fact you could just work with the subset of objects that are exactly the same between the two environments: [cos~] [phasor~] [biquad~] and

Re: [PD] no pd??

2012-01-03 Thread hans w. koch
actually, i think millers take on this is still the best idea and since there is also a sc~ external for max, max could be used as a mere canvas :-) but one still would have to come up with some impressive music ;-) (whatever that might mean) how about inventing a composer named donatién

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread alex
Ha, I got a different reply earlier: We decied to avoid the use of Pd and SuperCollider for internal and technical resons and unfortunately we cannot change our policy. So please, if you are interested in the call, please send a more pertinent question. So apparently there are reasons but they

Re: [PD] no pd??

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
Le 2012-01-04 à 09:55:00, Richie Cyngler a écrit : I don't think you're follow the intention. The intention of using [pd~] in Max would be to subvert the intentions of the organisers, because their policy is exclusive for no apparent reason. At least that is my take on it. I don't think

Re: [PD] no pd??

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
Le 2012-01-04 à 00:53:00, hans w. koch a écrit : how about inventing a composer named donatién collidus and reach out to the supercolliders for a collaborative effort? i´d happily provide assistance with my maxlicense in wrapping it all up. Why not Nicolas Bourbaki while you're at it ?

Re: [PD] no pd??

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
Le 2012-01-03 à 17:27:00, Mathieu Bouchard a écrit : Well, it would be fine if it just had MAX in the name of the contest : then it wouldn't sound like it's meant to be about a programme in particular. Heh, I forgot a « not » somewhere near the end...

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.43-1 test7 (!) available

2012-01-03 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Sounds like you are using the old build system in pd/src/configure.in. I recommend using the new build system in pd/autogen.sh and pd/configure.ac. The 'make install' should work better. .hc On Jan 3, 2012, at 2:23 AM, cyrille henry wrote: when compiling pd from source? cheers C Le

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
just laughing of when j. defended bek ... oh how we laughed at awkwardness and inability... those who followed the thread will get it and happy new gear, you technomological people, me i don't give a shit sevy alex wrote: Ha, I got a different reply earlier: We decied to avoid the use of

Re: [PD] no pd?? WTF ????

2012-01-03 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
xa! happy new year, you know revolution is behind, behind what ? una esquina maybe what revolution with open source when people wants the same productivity hey? productivity? that's what we should hate... we'll talk of it again over a beer, compa .. i meant it. shuvy xä wrote: in my