[PD] pd not starting on winXP

2008-05-30 Thread Enrico Costanza
Hello. I have pd 0.39-3 extended installed on my machine, but it does not run. If I try to launch pd.exe I can see the process in the task manager, but nothing happens. If I try to launch on the command prompt pd -verbose -d 5 -stderr I get the following: input channels = 2, output channels =

Re: [PD] pd not starting on winXP

2008-05-30 Thread Max Neupert
looks to me like a firewall issue. pd are two processes communicating which each other. try again with disabled firewall to find out if that's the cause and report back. m Am 2008-05-30 um 21:27 schrieb Enrico Costanza: Hello. I have pd 0.39-3 extended installed on my machine, but it

Re: [PD] pd not starting on winXP

2008-05-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Try the latest version, which is about to be released: http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/latest/Pd-0.40.3- extended-20080530-windowsxp-i386.exe http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/latest Or search puredata.info for the faq and search the faq for localhost, I think it was

Re: [PD] pd not starting on winXP

2008-05-30 Thread Enrico Costanza
Thanks for the replies. I tried to disable the firewall, but that did not make a difference. I installed the latest version (0.40.3) but I still got the same: pdtk_post {input channels = 2, output channels = 2} set pd_whichapi 0 set pd_whichmidiapi 3 Pd version 0.40-3extended-20080530 compiled

Re: [PD] pd not starting on winXP

2008-05-30 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 15:44 +0200, Enrico Costanza wrote: Thanks for the replies. I tried to disable the firewall, but that did not make a difference. I installed the latest version (0.40.3) but I still got the same: pdtk_post {input channels = 2, output channels = 2} set pd_whichapi

Re: [PD] pd not starting on winXP

2008-05-30 Thread Enrico Costanza
Solved. Thanks for suggesting the pdsend/pdreceive test. It made me realize that I had an extra firewall in place (I thought I only had the windows firewall). So opening it solved the problem. Thanks! Enrico Roman Haefeli wrote: On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 15:44 +0200, Enrico Costanza wrote: