I found Enriques patch in the archive and solved it like he did.
Attached just in case someone is wondering. It's probably some
depth-first thing why my first approach didn't work as expected.
m.
On 30.12.18 22:10, Max wrote:
Ah, cool. Thanks IOhannes.
I tried a Pd implementation but can't
Hi,
Interesting approach, thanks.
- Mail d'origine -
De: Claude Heiland-Allen
À: pd-list@lists.iem.at
Envoyé: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 16:53:55 +0100 (CET)
Objet: Re: [PD] Reset phase of phasor~ in DSP domain only?
Hi Nicolas,
On 31/12/2018 15:28, Nicolas Danet wrote:
> Is there any clever
Hi Nicolas,
On 31/12/2018 15:28, Nicolas Danet wrote:
Is there any clever trick to reset the phase of a [phasor~] in the DSP domain
only (i.e. WITHOUT using the right inlet)?
You could maybe make something after the [phasor~] using [samphold~]
and [-~] and [wrap~]?
phasor~
|\
| \
I believe it was based on my xy abstraction, which is completely vanilla ;)
https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/10854/xy-abstraction-to-get-mouse-click-and-drag-coordinates-vanilla
On 23.12.18 21:42, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Thanks, the base for it was in the Pd patch repository
Here is a solution by Jonathan Wilkes that fetches the complete list of
creation args including zeros.
Source: https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-04/069941.html
On 22.12.18 19:52, Peter P. wrote:
> * hans w. koch [2018-12-22 19:28]:
>> i have this vanilla abstraction based on a
