Re: [PD] Status of PD double precision

2018-12-19 Thread Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list
> Though Pd 0.49 compiled as above shows those small and large numbers, it can't show all significant decimals in the GUI. This of course limits the usefulness of double precision and also complicates the interpretation of other tests. Hi Katja, Have you taken a look at Purr Data? AFAICT the

Re: [PD] Status of PD double precision

2018-12-19 Thread katja
On 12/17/18, Thomas Grill wrote: > No time to check deeper now, but to my surprise > CFLAGS "-D PD_FLOATSIZE=64" ./configure && make > does indeed compile from the vanilla git repo (but doesn't link with > portmidi and portaudio for other reasons). > The definitions in m_pd.h suggest that

Re: [PD] Status of PD double precision

2018-12-18 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 12/16/18 1:16 PM, Giulio Moro via Pd-list wrote: > It's been done this past summer for Purr-data/Pd-l2ork. Here is the report:  > http://disis.music.vt.edu/pipermail/l2ork-dev/2018-August/002019.html i did a check of the changes that went into purr-data, and afaict some of them are already in

Re: [PD] Status of PD double precision

2018-12-17 Thread Miller Puckette
Katja Vetter has tried this and compiled a list of changes needed to make it work. It compiles fine, but apprently quite a few of the objects have trouble functioning correctly. cheers Miller On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:48:15PM +0100, Thomas Grill wrote: > > Am 16.12.2018 um 18:41 schrieb

Re: [PD] Status of PD double precision

2018-12-17 Thread Thomas Grill
> Am 16.12.2018 um 18:41 schrieb Alexandre Torres Porres : > Am I crazy or did I hear some talk about 64bit for pd vanilla soon, maybe as > early as 0.50-0? No time to check deeper now, but to my surprise CFLAGS "-D PD_FLOATSIZE=64" ./configure && make does indeed compile from the vanilla git

Re: [PD] Status of PD double precision

2018-12-16 Thread Dario Sanfilippo
I've just tested this release: https://github.com/jonwwilkes/purr-data/releases/download/2.6.0/purr-double-trouble-test1-osx_10.11-x86_64-dmg.zip . I've added 1 to 1e10 and then subtracted 1e10 expecting to get 1, but I get 0, so it doesn't seem double. Do you get the same behaviour? D

Re: [PD] Status of PD double precision

2018-12-16 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Am I crazy or did I hear some talk about 64bit for pd vanilla soon, maybe as early as 0.50-0? cheers Em dom, 16 de dez de 2018 às 11:37, hans w. koch escreveu: > and then there is also spaghettis: > https://github.com/Spaghettis/Spaghettis > which is double prec. but not as encompassing as

Re: [PD] Status of PD double precision

2018-12-16 Thread hans w. koch
and then there is also spaghettis: https://github.com/Spaghettis/Spaghettis which is double prec. but not as encompassing as purr data. best hans > Am 16.12.2018 um 13:16 schrieb Giulio Moro via Pd-list : > > It's been done this past summer for Purr-data/Pd-l2ork. Here is the report: >

Re: [PD] Status of PD double precision

2018-12-16 Thread Giulio Moro via Pd-list
It's been done this past summer for Purr-data/Pd-l2ork. Here is the report:  http://disis.music.vt.edu/pipermail/l2ork-dev/2018-August/002019.html Best, Giulio On Sunday, 16 December 2018, 11:29:25 GMT, Dario Sanfilippo wrote: Hello, list. I'm just curious to know if anybody is actively