Re: [PDB Tech] allow empty IP field or not?

2016-12-27 Thread Joe Provo
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:55:22AM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote: > On 25.12.2016 19:26, Joe Provo wrote: > > [this time form the correct address...] > > > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Sascha Pollok wrote: > >> Hi Job, et al, > >> > >> Let's please keep it required. Many people rely

Re: [PDB Tech] Help with peeringdb app

2016-12-27 Thread Matt Griswold
Sorry for the delay, this was in spam. * Regivaldo Gomes Costa [161113 00:32 +]: > I'm using Ubuntu 14.04, and after have been installed the peeringdb > application using pip, I made the configuration in according my > database. However, when I used the sync

Re: [PDB Tech] allow empty IP field or not?

2016-12-27 Thread Chris Caputo
Sometimes folks have the IPv6 flag enabled, but they aren't yet doing IPv6 at a particular IXP. If they fill out the IPv6 address, we've seen participants with automated session configuration based on PeeringDB try to ND for a router that isn't yet configured to handle the ND. This results

Re: [PDB Tech] allow empty IP field or not?

2016-12-27 Thread Tim Kleefass
Hi, Die IXP website list the IP address within the customer portal, so you need to login to the IXP customer portal to see the IP addresses of the peers. Before allowing an empty IP address in the peering DB I would add the option to make an IP address (or the IXP participation) only visible to