On 4 October 2016 at 22:18, Matt Griswold wrote:
> From looking through the code, this was never implemented in v2, we can't
> think of any technical reasons so it was likely just my screw up while
> migrating the database. There are 84 dupe v4 and 51 dupe v6, so we'll fix
> the
*> There are 84 dupe v4 and 51 dupe v6, so we'll fix the data and add the
constraint.*
That constraint can be a problem.
Example:
Network ABC is given an IP by an IX and updates PeeringDB. Later on,
Network ABC leaves the IX, or goes out of business, or stops caring about
peering. Their
>From looking through the code, this was never implemented in v2, we can't
think of any technical reasons so it was likely just my screw up while
migrating the database. There are 84 dupe v4 and 51 dupe v6, so we'll fix
the data and add the constraint.
The deploy automation needs updating from
Slightly related: It would be nice if in addition to the Peer Name column,
the IPv4/IPv6 column and the Speed column could have natural sorts
available. (Natural sort by IPv4 addr, rather than IPv6 addr, unless IPv6
is put into a separate column.)
Chris
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Matt Griswold
Agreed, not sure how that got in, made
https://github.com/peeringdb/peeringdb/issues/71 and will check it out /
add better tests.
On Oct 4, 2016 3:46 PM, "Arnold Nipper" wrote:
> On 04.10.2016 22:29, Chris Caputo wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> >>
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> On 04.10.2016 18:53, James Bensley wrote:
> > On 13 September 2016 at 11:00, Stefan Pratter wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Thank you for bringing this to our attention, i have opened a github ticket
> >> for it here:
> >>
> >>
On 13 September 2016 at 11:00, Stefan Pratter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for bringing this to our attention, i have opened a github ticket
> for it here:
>
> https://github.com/peeringdb/peeringdb/issues/68
>
> Stefan
Whilst playing the the PDB API some more I have found another
Hi,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention, i have opened a github
ticket for it here:
https://github.com/peeringdb/peeringdb/issues/68
Stefan
On 09/09/16 17:29, James Bensley wrote:
Hi All,
When using the API to look at a random network I see a possible
difference in behavior