On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 19:14:35 -0800, ge...@gnu.org wrote:
> > > OTOH, I'm really against assertions in code. I consider it a serious
> desi=
> > gn
> > > flaw.
> >
> > Why?
>
> They cause the program to abort instead of giving the chance to handle the
> error.
There's no sensible way to
> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:25:48 -0500
> From: Michael Gold
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> > > We should also verify
> > >sizeof(pdf_list_iterator_s) >=3D3D sizeof(gl_list_iterator_t)
> > >and sizeof(pdf_hash_iterator_s) >=3D3D sizeof(gl_list_iterator_=
> t)
> > >
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 16:06:14 -0800, ge...@gnu.org wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:20:31 -0500
> > From: Michael Gold
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > They're 56 bytes on x86_64. Since all the struct's values are pointers
> > or size_t (which is pointer-sized on x86/x86_64),
> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:20:31 -0500
> From: Michael Gold
>
> We should also verify
>sizeof(pdf_list_iterator_s) >=3D sizeof(gl_list_iterator_t)
>and sizeof(pdf_hash_iterator_s) >=3D sizeof(gl_list_iterator_t)
>
BTW, I didn't use sizeof() on gl_list because that way we
> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:20:31 -0500
> From: Michael Gold
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:37:08 -0800, ge...@gnu.org wrote:
> > Hi hackers,
> >=20
> > I attach a patch for stack based iterators, in list and hash modules.
> >=20
> > BTW, the current gn
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:37:08 -0800, ge...@gnu.org wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> I attach a patch for stack based iterators, in list and hash modules.
>
> BTW, the current gnulib iterators are 28 bytes long, correct me if I'm wrong.
> I gave 48 bytes to iterators, though this remains open to discu
Hi hackers,
I attach a patch for stack based iterators, in list and hash modules.
BTW, the current gnulib iterators are 28 bytes long, correct me if I'm wrong.
I gave 48 bytes to iterators, though this remains open to discussion.
##
# Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar 0.90)
# revision_id
