Re: [pdf-devel] Solution to FS#130

2011-07-07 Thread Aleksander Morgado
> > The patch should be attached. I added the definitions of pdf_add/get_i/u32 > > into pdf-hash-helper.h. I documented the API regarding pdf_add/get_bool and > > pdf_add/get_i/u32 in gnupdf.texi. I hope that I have not made mistakes. > > > > > I just merged this patch, including the extra cast

Re: [pdf-devel] Solution to FS#130

2011-07-07 Thread Aleksander Morgado
> > The patch should be attached. I added the definitions of pdf_add/get_i/u32 > into pdf-hash-helper.h. I documented the API regarding pdf_add/get_bool and > pdf_add/get_i/u32 in gnupdf.texi. I hope that I have not made mistakes. > I just merged this patch, including the extra casts to long a

Re: [pdf-devel] Solution to FS#130

2011-05-21 Thread Franck Lesage
Hi, The patch should be attached. I added the definitions of pdf_add/get_i/u32 into pdf-hash-helper.h. I documented the API regarding pdf_add/get_bool and pdf_add/get_i/u32 in gnupdf.texi. I hope that I have not made mistakes. Regards -- Franck On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 04:48:56PM +0200, Aleksan

Re: [pdf-devel] Solution to FS#130

2011-05-20 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:30 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:43 +0200, Franck Lesage wrote: > > Hi, I bring you a patch for FS#130. The task seemed to me to be pretty easy. > > I guess that something will be wrong. I ran the Patch Safety Dispatcher and > > it didn't unde

Re: [pdf-devel] Solution to FS#130

2011-05-20 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:43 +0200, Franck Lesage wrote: > Hi, I bring you a patch for FS#130. The task seemed to me to be pretty easy. > I guess that something will be wrong. I ran the Patch Safety Dispatcher and > it didn't underline syntax error. > For the first patch I didn't run it... Seems