Re: [Pdl-devel] CHM/OpenGL-0.6704_01.tar.gz uploaded to CPAN

2015-06-16 Thread Christian Walde
There's this addition in the autoload sub, which i'm not sure is intentional: printf($AUTOLOAD); printf("\n"); -- With regards, Christian Walde -- ___ pdl-devel mailing list

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

2015-06-16 Thread Marek Gierliński
Thanks a lot, Chris! Marek On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 at 15:57 Chris Marshall wrote: > Marek- > > I've opened a highest priority bug report based on your information: > > http://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/390 > > Could you add information on your system specifics to the ticket > for reference (the

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Marshall
Marek- I've opened a highest priority bug report based on your information: http://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/390 Could you add information on your system specifics to the ticket for reference (the output of perldl -V has the main information)? We'll be updating the ticket as information beco

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

2015-06-16 Thread Marek Gierliński
This is very bad news for me. I just searched through my scripts and found 586 instances of 'stats'. If this is not corrected, I have to assume that all of them might potentially produce incorrect results, without even failing (like in the if($s > 0) example). We've been using 2.007 for a couple o

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

2015-06-16 Thread Marek Gierliński
OK, thank you for your explanations. I'm not sure if all of this makes sense. If you try print $s > 5; in the above example, you will get 'BAD'. 5 is just a scalar and not a bad value. And $s is a one-dimensional piddle with a value different from the bad value. Neither of the values in this cond

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Marshall
That definitely seems like a bug to me. Thanks for the cross-check, Marek. Devels, I see the same in the latest PDL release so it is not a PDL-2.007 only issue. --Chris On 6/16/2015 09:36, Marek Gierliński wrote: OK, thank you for your explanations. I'm not sure if all of this makes sense. I

Re: [Pdl-devel] CHM/OpenGL-0.6704_01.tar.gz uploaded to CPAN

2015-06-16 Thread kmx
> Note that Chris's successful build of OpenGL on SPP 5.22.0.1 is against > freeglut-2.8.1. (OpenGL doesn't build there against freeglut-3.0.0 either > - so SPP shipped with 2.8.1.) Exactly, if anyone wants to experiment with SPP 5.22.0.1 + freeglut-3.0.0 then download http://strawberryperl.co

Re: [Pdl-devel] CHM/OpenGL-0.6704_01.tar.gz uploaded to CPAN

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Marshall
I wonder if there is a way we could bulletproof the XS->C build process. For example, xsubpp could generate an assertion that would check for #defined values that match variable names. The question is how to avoid cases where this is exactly what you want. Maybe generate a warning instead? --Chr

Re: [Pdl-devel] [Pdl-general] PDL-2.012 released to CPAN

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Marshall
All- I'm happy to also report that PDL-2.012 seems to passing the ASPerl builds as well. One build failed due to out of memory in the VM (not PDL's fault although the machine generated code does put quite a load on the compiler). The remaining non-PDL-2.012 builds do have PPMs for either PDL-2.

[Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Marshall
This result seems to violate the principle of least surprise. On the LHS we have a PDL with badvalue(0) and on the RHS we have a perl scalar with value 0 (which happens to be the bad value for the PDL). It seems surprising that $pdl > 0 is actually $pdl > pdl(0)->badvalue(0) Thoughts? Chris --

Re: [Pdl-devel] CHM/OpenGL-0.6704_01.tar.gz uploaded to CPAN

2015-06-16 Thread Bob Free
Thanks for the update - will investigate and hopefully fix today! - Bob > On Jun 15, 2015, at 12:27 PM, Chris Marshall wrote: > > I wish I had read this email earlier. :-) > > I can report that I was able to build OpenGL-0.6704_01 on the recent SPP > 5.22.0.1 with the PDL 2.009_01. > It requ

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL-2.012 released to CPAN

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Marshall
I'm delighted to report that with this release, the UNKNOWN reports from CPAN Testers have dropped from ~20% to <2% which makes PDL-2.012 test as good or better than all previous PDL releases. The results are still coming in but it looks like a new high water mark for PDL performance. Thanks to e

Re: [Pdl-devel] CHM/OpenGL-0.6704_01.tar.gz uploaded to CPAN

2015-06-16 Thread sisyphus1
-Original Message- From: Ed Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 5:48 PM To: sisyph...@optusnet.com.au ; Bob Free ; Chris Marshall Cc: pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net ; kmx Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] CHM/OpenGL-0.6704_01.tar.gz uploaded to CPAN > I'll bet "far" and "near" are #defined to blank, and

Re: [Pdl-devel] CHM/OpenGL-0.6704_01.tar.gz uploaded to CPAN

2015-06-16 Thread Ed
I'll bet "far" and "near" are #defined to blank, and are a Windows pointer-size related issue. Seems best to avoid using them as identifiers in any case, ie push Rob's changes upstream? Ed -Original Message- From: sisyph...@optusnet.com.au Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 1:33 AM To: Bob F