: Ingo Schmid<mailto:ingo...@gmx.at>; David
Mertens<mailto:dcmertens.p...@gmail.com>
Cc: pdl-devel<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.075 released
Hi Ingo,
The specific case of a single-element ndarray which has a badvalue returning
true
documented as returning Perl scalars, and I was extremely surprised
> when I discovered it then did so.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> *From: *David Mertens
> *Sent: *24 February 2022 15:53
> *To: *Ingo Schmid
> *Cc: *pdl-devel
> *Subject: *Re:
mailto:ej...@hotmail.com>; David
Mertens<mailto:dcmertens.p...@gmail.com>
Cc: pdl-devel<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.075 released
Hi Ed,
I do not mind the behaviour as such but rather the fact that it changed. That
breaks previous code in non-ob
February 2022 19:08
> *To: *Ed . <mailto:ej...@hotmail.com>; David Mertens
> <mailto:dcmertens.p...@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *pdl-devel <mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *Subject: *Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.075 released
>
>
>
> Ed & David,
>
> I
.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.075 released
Hi Ingo,
I believe you didn’t run your code before emailing it, because $p isn’t
defined. Also, I hope the real code doesn’t have an isempty followed by a
Boolean check on ->nelem, because
ail.com>; David
Mertens<mailto:dcmertens.p...@gmail.com>
Cc: pdl-devel<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.075 released
Ed & David,
I stumbled across the problem because of this behaviour:
pdl> p max pdl[]
BAD
which does not expand to 0 a
re never documented as returning Perl scalars, and I was extremely
> surprised when I discovered it then did so.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> *From: *David Mertens <mailto:dcmertens.p...@gmail.com>
> *Sent: *24 February 2022 15:53
> *To: *Ingo Sc
ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.075 released
Hi Ingo,
I believe you didn’t run your code before emailing it, because $p isn’t
defined. Also, I hope the real code doesn’t have an isempty followed by a
Boolean check on ->nelem, because isempty is literally implemented as nel
sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.075 released
HI Ed,
here's some feedback to the new release. Thank you for your tireless efforts!
I experience errors in previously working code, at least in 2.074 and 2.075.
$r and $i are piddles, as are $empty_lines and $vlines. These lines (6
et>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.075 released
To follow-up on max/min being piddles, this broke some of my tests in
PDL::Parallel::threads. Specifically croak-in-boolean-context is now easily
triggered where it used to be safe:
if ($data->max < 40) { # croaks: piddle in boolean context
To follow-up on max/min being piddles, this broke some of my tests in
PDL::Parallel::threads. Specifically croak-in-boolean-context is now easily
triggered where it used to be safe:
if ($data->max < 40) { # croaks: piddle in boolean context
}
Was this use case considered and discussed?
HI Ed,
here's some feedback to the new release. Thank you for your tireless
efforts!
I experience errors in previously working code, at least in 2.074 and 2.075.
$r and $i are piddles, as are $empty_lines and $vlines. These lines (67
#!perl
use PDL;
use PDL::NiceSlice;
use 5.10.0;
use strict
12 matches
Mail list logo
