On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 04:18:41PM +, Ed . wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> I agree that in a sense, the system was buggy (albeit only misleading rather
> than actually operating wrongly), which is why I fixed it and that will be
> reflected in the next version.
Great!
> In the meantime, there is the
rt any problems!
Best regards,
Ed
From: Jörg Sommrey
Sent: 22 January 2025 15:33
To: Ed .
Cc: Luis Mochan ; perldl ;
perldl
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] pdl scripts
On Wed 22 Jan 2025 03:55:20 PM CET, "Ed ." wrote:
> Hi Jörg,
>
> Can you please s
adding to the cpanm
invocation.
Best regards,
Ed
From: Luis Mochan
Sent: 22 January 2025 15:38
To: Ed .
Cc: perldl ; perldl
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] pdl scripts
Hi Ed,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 02:50:41PM +, Ed . wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> The suggestion
n. I suggested adding
> > Term::ReadKey to the required packages, so it would be installed
> > automatically. Maybe that is not the correct solution, but then, I
> > don't know, what would be the correct solution?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Luis
> >
Hi Ed,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 02:50:41PM +, Ed . wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> The suggestion I made in my first reply: "cpanm can be told to install
> recommended modules" is the one I am still making.
I understand. My worry is about the new users. They may just turn away
if they believe the syste
which isn't very
surprising), and wouldn't want to use it without readline (which I
have faced when debugging in a qemu environment on a weird
architecture). I am not going to make any of the Term::* be
"required" for PDL. I hope you understand.
If it helps, the REPL scrip
need to do cpanm PDL::Perldl2 (and then
wait for Moose et al to get installed).
Best regards,
Ed
From: Jörg Sommrey
Sent: 22 January 2025 14:30
To: Luis Mochan
Cc: Ed . ; perldl ; perldl
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] pdl scripts
Hi Luis,
you might try 'pd
e (which I
have faced when debugging in a qemu environment on a weird
architecture). I am not going to make any of the Term::* be
"required" for PDL. I hope you understand.
If it helps, the REPL script was installed, but not all of the
components. It does sound like you're as
:RK not
being there - it was being used only for apropos and a couple of other places
to get the screen width.
Best regards,
Ed
From: Luis Mochan
Sent: 22 January 2025 03:46
To: Ed .
Cc: perldl ; perldl
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] pdl scripts
Hi Ed,
Maybe I
ript was installed, but not all of the components. It
> does sound like you're asking me to make a separate PDL::REPL repo where that
> stuff would live, but I don't want to do that.
>
> Best regards,
> Ed
>
>
> From: Luis Mochan
don't want to do that.
Best regards,
Ed
From: Luis Mochan
Sent: 21 January 2025 20:07
To: Ed .
Cc: perldl ; perldl
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] pdl scripts
Hi Ed,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 05:13:09PM +, Ed . wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> That's a reall
Hi Ed,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 05:13:09PM +, Ed . wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> That's a really good question!
>
> PDL's "requirements" (when you say e.g. cpanm PDL) are hard requirements for
> PDL to run: largely File::Map and File::Which. CPAN has a mechanism to
> "recommend" other modules, includ
Hi Luis,
That's a really good question!
PDL's "requirements" (when you say e.g. cpanm PDL) are hard requirements for
PDL to run: largely File::Map and File::Which. CPAN has a mechanism to
"recommend" other modules, including Term::ReadKey. It has done so for a long
time. cpanm can be told to i
13 matches
Mail list logo
