[Pdl-devel] PDL-NetCDF-4.20 and netcdf-4.4.0

2016-06-04 Thread sisyphus1
Hi, On Windows, no problems building PDL-NetCDF-4.20 against netcdf-4.3.3.1 and earlier. But a disconcerting thing happens when I build against netcdf-4.4.0. The 'perl Makefile.PL' step throws up this message: nc_inq_var_deflate function not found, no HDF library installed available The odd

Re: [Pdl-devel] SciPDL 3 for Mac OS X

2016-06-04 Thread Chris Marshall
Am I the only one who finds it confusing that SciPDL, which is basically a binary PDL distribution, has a different version number? What about matching the version of the base PDL? On 6/4/2016 00:39, Karl Glazebrook wrote: > Done! > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2148080/SciPDL-v3.1.

Re: [Pdl-devel] cleanups

2016-06-04 Thread Chris Marshall
Hi Karl- I suggest opening a ticket with the information on platform, compiler, and the log of issues. While warnings are often only annoying, they can indicate a potential problem in general or a platform specific one. Unfortunately, without a full, multi-platform regression test suite, it can

Re: [Pdl-devel] OS X issue

2016-06-04 Thread Ed
I believe MM will have got that from the configuration of Perl itself. You could confirm/deny that by doing "perldoc -m Config" and searching for it there? Best regards, Ed -Original Message- From: Karl Glazebrook Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2016 5:01 AM To: Karl Glazebrook Cc: pdl-devel

Re: [Pdl-devel] SciPDL 3 for Mac OS X

2016-06-04 Thread Karl Glazebrook
Opinions on this are welcome! The 2 to 3 thing was because I made a big change to the style of SciPDL... (1) including Perl itself and (2) making a draggable DMG rather than a packagemaker package. I suppose I could just call it 'newSciPDL' and match the version numbers - Karl > On 4 Jun

Re: [Pdl-devel] OS X issue

2016-06-04 Thread Karl Glazebrook
nope it is a blank! > On 4 Jun 2016, at 11:54 PM, Ed wrote: > > I believe MM will have got that from the configuration of Perl itself. You > could confirm/deny that by doing "perldoc -m Config" and searching for it > there? > > Best regards, > Ed > > -Original Message- From: Karl Gla