Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL-2.019 released

2018-05-06 Thread Christian Walde
On Sat, 05 May 2018 23:22:16 +0200, Ed . wrote: Christian, could you turn off the SF-mirroring script? # 0-59/5 * * * * cd /root/pdl_repo_mirrors/pdl.git && git update-mirror # 1-59/5 * * * * cd /root/pdl_repo_mirrors/pdl-linearalgebra.git && git update-mirror # 2-59/5 * * * * cd /root/pdl_r

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL-2.019 released

2018-05-06 Thread Ed .
My immediate thought is: for main PDL, great! For the others, Chris - do you want the others turned back on for now, or shall I prepare PRs to switch their metadata over as well? For main PDL, everyone please start using the GitHub repo as the main source. You can update your local repo setting

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL-2.019 released

2018-05-06 Thread Chris Marshall
Let's have a "push freeze" for:   PDL::LinearAlgebra   PDL::Book   PDL::Graphics::PLplot   PDL::IO::HDF5   PDL::FFTW 2.x   pdl-www and switch to the github repositories. Most were adopted by me as their original developers moved on and their update rate has been almost nothing since PDL-2.018.

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL-2.019 released

2018-05-06 Thread Ed .
Chris, Regarding those 6: why don't we just declare that those now "properly" live on GitHub? That matters simply because the release manager, ie you, just start using that as the authoritative location for them. If you like that thought, then we don't need a "push freeze", just everyone point

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL-2.019 released

2018-05-06 Thread Chris Marshall
That is what I meant---more of a "pro forma" push freeze --Chris On 5/6/2018 16:43, Ed . wrote: Chris, Regarding those 6: why don't we just declare that those now "properly" live on GitHub? That matters simply because the release manager, ie you, just start using that as the authoritative