-- Forwarded message -
From: Diab Jerius
Date: Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: PDL release; I'm volunteering.
To: Chris Marshall
Sorry for the radio silence! We've had a wet spring in the Boston
area and suddenly got nice weekend weather, which meant
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:52 PM Ed . wrote:
>
> Just to be clear; you're saying that Perl (which seems quite nice)
> illustrates the plus side of things being methods?
Yes. My categorical statement was too broad. I'm not sure what the
sweet spot is between ease of use and mandating a clean core
I recognize how hard documentation is to write, and I'm grateful that
PDL has so much of it. However, there is room for improvement. The
following comments are intended as an objective critique and to start
a discussion which can lead to cohesive design and documentation
standards.
The current d
I think that moving away from POD is incompatible with sticking with
metacpan.org. I would instead advocate:
* reorganise docs as you've rightly said
* stick with POD - I would also advocate using Inline::Pdlpp as I have with
PDLA::IO::HDF::* -
https://metacpan.org/source/ETJ/PDLA-IO-HDF-2.0191
