Re: [Pdl-devel] [Pdl-general] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

Craig, would you agree that’s more of an argument for a nan() function to make a NaN? How much effort would it be to update that code? In any case, if the code only uses real types, it will operate exactly the same as it does now. From: Craig DeForest Sent: 21 F

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026 released to CPAN

Thanks for the report! (I’m hoping the new 0.07 still works with the main-released 2.026 as well) From: Luis Mochan Sent: 21 February 2021 01:21 To: pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; perldl

Re: [Pdl-devel] [Pdl-general] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

Craig, to add to that: asin(2) by itself has changed behaviour. pdl(‘NaN’) already exists as an easy way to get a NaN. The tests don’t have any checks on that behaviour. asin(2) really isn’t “not a number” – it’s only that the older libraries couldn’t correctly calculate/handle it. Therefore, h

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026 released to CPAN

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 09:56:43AM +, Ed . wrote: > Thanks for the report! (I’m hoping the new 0.07 still works with the > main-released 2.026 as well) I just tried it, PERL 2.32.1, PDL 2.0026 and FFTW3 0.07. It PASSed its tests and it seems to work. Regards, Luis --

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026 released to CPAN

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:19:39AM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 09:56:43AM +, Ed . wrote: > > Thanks for the report! (I’m hoping the new 0.07 still works with the > > main-released 2.026 as well) > > I just tried it, PERL 2.32.1... Sorry, 5.32.1 --