On 10.5.2016 1:05, sisyph...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
> -Original Message- From: kmx
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 6:49 AM
> To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] How can I get PDL-2.015 on CPAN updated with a
> patch?
>
>> I am
-Original Message-
From: kmx
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 6:49 AM
To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] How can I get PDL-2.015 on CPAN updated with a
patch?
> I am going to bundle gsl-2.1 with the next strawberry perl (5.24.0)
Not really relevant to
On 9.5.2016 23:34, Chris Marshall wrote:
> What timeframe were you looking to release Strawberry perl for perl 5.24?
Days :)
Of course there is also an option to stay with gsl-1.x
--
kmx
--
Mobile security can be
If you don't mind, could we stick with GSL 1.x for this go around?
It would be a rush to get the release out and rushed releases never end
well! :-)
--Chris
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:47 PM, kmx wrote:
> On 9.5.2016 23:34, Chris Marshall wrote:
>
>> What timeframe were you
Hi kmx-
I was planning for a PDL-2.016 release in the next couple of weeks to
include
the various bug fixes and enhancements since PDL-2.015 came out. What
timeframe were you looking to release Strawberry perl for perl 5.24?
--Chris
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:49 PM, kmx wrote:
Happy to hear that, and thanks for the test! I will merge that branch into
master presently.
cheers,
Derek
> On Apr 26, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Jovan Trujillo wrote:
>
> Update:
> I made a fresh install of NetBSD 7.0 on a virtual machine and compiled the
>
Update:
I made a fresh install of NetBSD 7.0 on a virtual machine and compiled the
sf#407_gsl-2.0 branch successfully. Here is my test summary report, looks
like all tests pass.
Test Summary Report
---
t/bad.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 82 Failed: 0)
TODO passed:
Well I have an account on SDF (http://sdf.org/) and their NetBSD 7.0 server
only has g95 installed and has some trouble with pthreads. But I do have
GSL 2.1 intalled locally.
So I disabled pthreads by modifying perldl.config "WITH_POSIX_THREADS =>
0" and made a symlink of g95 to f77 to get
Hi Jovan,
The sf#407_gsl2.0 branch is now passing all of our automated build tests, so if
you can try it out on what platforms you have handy, I'd appreciate it. We
have a lot of Linux testers and some Windows as well, but I don't know that
there are any PDL developers that use NetBSD. Tests
In my review of outstanding PDL-2.015 CPAN Testers FAIL reports,
I observe that the GSL-2.1 issue(s) cause many NetBSD failures.
There are a large number of FAIL reports for openbsd coming from
t/slice.t where only 17/92 tests are run.
--Chris
On 4/19/2016 15:17, Derek Lamb wrote:
Hi Jovan,
Hi Jovan,
Go ahead and give it a whirl. I have not added anything to the test suite, so
it'll be a compiler and execution check. Look for branch 'sf#407_gsl2.0' on
SF:(https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/code/ci/sf%23407_gsl2.0/tree/ ; I'm getting a
404 error at the moment), or on GitHub:
Hi all,
I have been updating to GSL-2.1 and PDL-2.015 on my various machines,
and keep
having to do this patch to make it work:
https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/407/
Why hasn't anybody updated PDL-2.015 on CPAN to include this patch? Should
I just email the diff to Chris Marshall? Can I
12 matches
Mail list logo