Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Ed .
ge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078 Thank you, Ed. I understand what you mean. I believe now that a previous version of Alien::proj was indeed present so perhaps that was causing som trouble. I also understand what you say about perldl.conf. I guess we can consider this case close

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Hernán De Angelis
ems, for PDL. We are sticking with it until a > convincing case is made for something better. > > > > Best regards, > > Ed > > > > *From: *Hernán De Angelis > *Sent: *12 April 2022 12:50 > *To: *pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net > *Subject: *Re: [Pdl-gener

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Ed .
ge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078 On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 02:55:08PM +, Ed . wrote: > Hi Luis! > > Glad to hear Minuit is still in use. If it were removed from main > PDL, it would only be to make it available separately

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Ed .
<mailto:variablestarli...@gmail.com> Sent: 12 April 2022 12:50 To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078 Dear all, Just to report that thanks to a good collaboration with Shawn we were able to track the problem

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Luis Mochan
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 02:55:08PM +, Ed . wrote: > Hi Luis! > > Glad to hear Minuit is still in use. If it were removed from main > PDL, it would only be to make it available separately on CPAN as > PDL::Minuit (somewhat similar to PDL::FFTW3). That's a good option. > I’m afraid I’m not

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Shawn Laffan
It would be useful to be able to build PDL without the proj-dependent components. This could maybe be done using an environment variable, or an argument passed to the ```perl Makefile.PL``` call. Ed would be better placed to comment on this aspect. Alien::proj will not attempt to build from

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Hernán De Angelis
Hello Shawn Thanks for your answer. I am not trying to build Alien::proj. I just would like to tell PDL not to care about it. How is it that up to 2.027 this wasn't a problem but it suddenly is in 2.028? I will dig a bit on this and try to find out. I have a dislike of Alien::* since it will

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-11 Thread Shawn Laffan
Hello Hernan, If you have issues installing Alien::proj then could you please file a bug report? https://github.com/shawnlaffan/perl-alien-proj If you have proj installed with its headers then Alien::proj will run a system install. This will just use your existing installation. If it cannot

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-11 Thread Luis Mochan
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:12:43PM +, Ed . wrote: > ... > ...The Fortran code in those submodules (Minuit and Slatec) are > written in Fortran 77, and are dramatically obsolete. We may or may > not remove them into separate distributions, since I doubt anyone uses > them. I do... :( What

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-11 Thread Ed .
Hi Hernán! PDL’s build (which I suspect you normally do using a tool that doesn’t show you these messages) is only warning you that it can’t build Proj4 or HDF4. It will carry on and build everything else that it can, as hopefully you’re seeing. You’re saying core and GSL work, which wouldn’t