I use a lot of APX 100.
James Adams wrote:
I've just bought a roll of Agfapan APX 100 Pro 120 film to try out my
Ricohflex TLR camera. Has anyone used Agfapan APX Pro film?
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
Send it on ...
PO Box 1489
El Cerrito CA 94530-4489
BTW, APX 400 is a pretty grainy film with, I think, great tonality. I'd
not use it with HC-110, but, with larger negs, the results practically
glow with Rodinal 1:100. For most of the photography I do, APX 100 with
Rodinal 1:100 gives superb
James,
I have shot one roll of the 400 speed. What I got back from my lab
was not a pretty sight. It seemed to be very contrasty and heavy
looking. Not at all what I expected. I have since found out that
they develop with Kodak HC-110 Dilution B. I don't know how
compatible it is with that.
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received it also and couldn't figure out where they got my email address
either.
I got it. Deadbeat spammer probably got it out of the archives. I'm not
sure if they display the email address or not. But if you are looking for
a lot of email
Shel,
If it's ok, I'll send a 6X7 neg and one of their prints so you can see
how they did.
Bruce
Monday, April 22, 2002, 8:29:34 PM, you wrote:
SB Send it on ...
SB PO Box 1489
SB El Cerrito CA 94530-4489
SB BTW, APX 400 is a pretty grainy film with, I think, great tonality. I'd
SB not
Hi Mark ...
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
Mark Cassino wrote:
Yow - I just ran some tests and the grain reduction on Vuescan is indeed
clobbering the detail. I was scanning for web display and resampling the
images down to ~640 x 480 - at which point they look OK - but I
It's the only film I have used in my Yashica D tlr. I really like it
quite a bit and haven't seen any reason to try anything different, at
least in 120 format.
35mm, that's a different story (I have 4 different bw films loaded
right now in various cameras) but I use it quite a bit here too
Hi,
The main differences are:
- The SF1 is bigger, heavier, has more metal in it.
- The SF1 has a better finder, with interchangeable screens.
- The SF1 has better in focus indicator. Not a singke dot (like MZ5n), but
with two additional arrows showing the direction to turn the focus ring.
-
Sure ... it'll be an education. I'll try a print with both the
condenser and the dichro heads. Do you know on what paper/grade the
print was made? It's possible your lab just used the wrong grade of
paper.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shel,
If it's ok, I'll send a 6X7 neg and one of their prints
Hi,
On 22 Apr 2002 at 18:18, Mishka wrote:
playing devil's advocate, according to
http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/mf/coatings.html
there's no significant improvement in flare resistance between single- and
multicoated optics, in lab tests at least. granted, it talks mostly about
primes, but
Tiger:
Is everyone's the same as mine:
Yes
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
UK Pentax Marketing Manager John Dickins has kindly offered the loan of
some Pentax cameras and lenses for those attending the PDML UK gathering
at Duxford on July 13 / 14th. Unfortunately John won't be attending
himself as it's also the Glorious Goodwood Festival of Speed weekend, and
a
I wrote:
However, the apparent viewing distance of the f-stop
window is such close (by far closer than the viewing
distance of the screen) that the f-stop number is
factually invisible during shooting.
Lukasz replied: -
Your post is really puzzling to me, for I see the
In a message dated 22/04/02 19:42:43 GMT Daylight Time, Mick writes:
Aaron said: Should ask him how his cap differs from this:
Well, it *is* a different cap. It's a much older incarnation of the cap
currently available, and of a slightly different design. Yes it performs the
same function
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:38 PM
Subject: Most Used Body Survey Results UPDATE 3
Most used PENTAX bodies since many twenty years are three
PENTAX K2 (and two K2 DMD, but I don't use or own a motordrive)
Seems a shame not to have the PZ-1p as an option here; seems like a much
closer match to the SF1. (Judging from Gabor's list of features; I am not
actually familiar with the SF1.)
ERNR
My photographs hang on the virtual walls at http://members.aol.com/ernreed
-
This message is from the
SB Bruce Dayton wrote:
I have shot one roll of the 400 speed. What I got back from my lab
was not a pretty sight. It seemed to be very contrasty and heavy
looking. Not at all what I expected. I have since found out that
they develop with Kodak HC-110 Dilution B. I don't know
On Monday, April 22, 2002, at 11:57 AM, Robert Harris wrote:
You mean that in addition to big, klunky cameras, secret passwords and
funny hats you will have secret rings, too? Wow.
Who you callin' klunky, buster? The P67 is balanced like a dream, with
well placed controls.
-Brother Aaron
On Monday, April 22, 2002, at 06:18 PM, Mishka wrote:
playing devil's advocate, according to
http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/mf/coatings.html
there's no significant improvement in flare resistance between single-
and
multicoated optics, in lab tests at least. granted, it talks mostly
I like uncluttered viewfinders. I very much like my Pentax 67's
non-metering prism, because there's nothing in there but picture.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
On Monday, April 22, 2002, at 09:07 AM, Christian Skofteland wrote:
You Only Live Twice with Sean Connery
How does that dialogue in Trainspotting go?
Renton: He's always been lacking in strength of character.
Mother Superior: He knows a lot about Sean Connery.
Renton: That's hardly a
On Monday, April 22, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Brendan wrote:
I still find
dust and scan lines on the scans tho, not to bad but
it will have to do untill I find some one better ( or
closer as in Aaron's case )
Comparing them to me is silly: what do they charge per scan? Now try to
remember
On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 07:19 AM, Robert Harris wrote:
Hey -- Bill Gates says that about his bloated and ungainly Windows,
too. :)
Ooh, now them's fightin' words. ;)
What's clunky about the 67 interface?
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Hi Angel,
I don`t have the info you are looking for, BUT, I was wondering if you have
been to the radio antenna?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Angel Ramos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:44 AM
Subject: Pugster
UK Pentax Marketing Manager John Dickins has kindly offered the loan of
some Pentax cameras and lenses for those attending the PDML UK gathering
at Duxford on July 13 / 14th. Unfortunately John won't be attending
himself as it's also the Glorious Goodwood Festival of Speed weekend, and
a
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Who you callin' klunky, buster? The P67 is balanced like a dream, with
well placed controls.
I'm still waiting to see if there's an answer to my original question,
potential future Brothers. :)
Anyways, I'm going off Thursday to take a look at the
Why would Henri Cartier-Bresson make a lousy farmer?
Cos he hated crops.
D'oh. I can't belive I wrote that.
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 08:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is more to lens flare than lens coatings. There
are aspects to lens constuction that also have great
effect. Some of the things are internal baffling,
blackening the edges of the lens elements covering all
the internal
Alexander Krohe wrote:
The apparent viewing distance of the f-stop
window is such close (by far closer than the viewing
distance of the screen) that the f-stop number is
factually invisible during shooting.
Apparent viewing distance of the readouts is an important ergonomic factor, one
On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 09:14 AM, gfen wrote:
I'm still waiting to see if there's an answer to my original question,
potential future Brothers. :)
What was the question? About an MF equivalent to Boz's pages? I
haven't seen one.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
Bob Blakely wrote:
So, if they bought the rights to a commercial process, who did they buy
these rights from?
OCLI evidently developed the coating techniques with its own money.
From The unofficial Asahi Pentax Spotmatic Home Page
http://212.187.14.19/lenses.htm :
The first of the SMC
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
The P67 is balanced like a dream, with well placed controls.
I just received a 1978 copy of Popular Photography. It features a two-page color ad by
Pentax, introducing the 67. I had never seen a picture and was impressed by how--well,
how 35mm it looked.
[EMAIL
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, gfen wrote:
I'm still waiting to see if there's an answer to my original question,
potential future Brothers. :)
ps: if this has an incredibly cranky tone, its because my day has already
sunken below its usual poor expectations. -sigh-
--
http://www.infotainment.org
But he was Out standing in his field. Sorry, lousy farmer
joke.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: Henri Cartier-Bresson
Why would Henri
Did you use a professional bug this time,
Brendan.VBG
Al kidding aside,they look very nice.I can see
why a tripod vs handheld would give better
results at those shutter speeds.
I seem to have lost Aarons e mail on the comments
about which Fuji film is to which Kodak film.
Is the NPS similar to
so it doesn't have to be a face, does it
My Pocket Oxford Dictionary defines Portrait as:
'Painted, drawn, or photographic likeness of person or animal,
elaborate or vivid description...'
--
http://fastmail.fm/ - IMAP accessible web-mail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Again I ask:
Can anyone tell me whether Nikon's HN-13 72mm screw-in hood will fit any ol' 72mm
threaded filter? A seller told me It works on with the Nikon circular polarizer [for
which it was designed]. Geometrically, it's a good candidate for my 300/45 and even
with a step-up ring it's
Well up till now I was only interested in landscapes (J.Cornish/A.Adams).
Alan
Just bought HC-B 'Masters of Photography' book.
I never thought much of HC-B's work until now.
My gosh, what had you seen before?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
A propos de Paris
Alan Abbott wrote:
Just bought HC-B 'Masters of Photography' book.
I never thought much of HC-B's work until now.
I am impressed.
Does anyone know of any other good examples of his work?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
You might be surprised by the number of Leica users here.
Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
I ... recently made a mistake of looking through a Leica
viewfinder and firing the shutter. Well - at first I wasn't even sure
whether it actually fired (sooo quiet and vibration free).
Enough already - it's
Neither can we!
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject: Re: Henri Cartier-Bresson
Why would Henri Cartier-Bresson make a lousy farmer?
Cos he hated crops.
D'oh. I can't belive
If there was one out there,it would make us fence
sitters happy.:)
BTW saw some inexpensive Bronica's on Henrys
site.
Dave
What was the question? About an MF equivalent to Boz's pages? I
haven't seen one.
-Aaron
-
End Original Message
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
SG - The SF1 has a better finder, with interchangeable screens.
You can easily fit the C74 screen with split-image into it, or use the
AF screen, they are both easy to focus manually on the SFXn (SF1n).
the SFXn is pretty rugged body, in terms or reliability of the shutter
mechanism. Also, it's
I will have something like 24 hours in London in the middle of June. Can
anyone suggest a good shop where I can touch and feel some cameras?
Len Zedel.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Check out
http://www.cdegroot.com/archives/yashicacontax-slr/199905/msg00087.html
for a summary of the collaboration between Pentax and Zeiss by someone paraphrasing a
book by an Asahi historian. It provides some details about how the coatings and two or
three lenses began as joint
You send them to Photoclick so it is the same
actually, just you are far, but then photoclick knows
the channels for NPS, they got PC very right.
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, April 22, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Brendan
wrote:
I still find
dust and scan lines on the
Robert Harris (), replying to Aaron (), wrote:
Hey -- Bill Gates says that about his bloated and
ungainly Windows, too. :)
Who you callin' klunky, buster? The P67 is balanced like
a dream, with well placed controls.
Tsk, tsk Bob -- no need to get nasty now, is there? ;^)
David Brooks wrote:
I seem to have lost Aarons e mail on the comments
about which Fuji film is to which Kodak film.
SHeeZ, dang those Fuji names! is the crypto
... NPS, NPH NPZ are the low-contrast emulsions
Bill
... who just got a 220 each
I will have something like 24 hours in London in the middle of June.
Can anyone suggest a good shop where I can touch and feel some cameras?
Len,
There are a whole cluster of camera shops in the south Bloomsbury area
around the British Museum. Right next to the museum is a place called
Pied
Dave:
I have the Lumiquest Pocket Bounce myself, mounted on
the 283. The 285 has the moving head for TELE, NORM,
or WIDE setting. Does that mess up the Pocket Bounce?
Does it fall off? Where did you mount the velcro,
for best performance?
Thanks-can't wait to try it!
--- David Brooks
A while back someone posted info about a few sites in Canada that
specialized in mail order and which had good prices on med format gear.
Can't find the info. Any help out there?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
David Brooks wrote:
If there was one out there,it would make us fence
sitters happy.:)
I've been seriously considering putting together a Pentax 6x7 site with
similar kinds of info to Boz's site. The bad news is that I have too many
other projects going at the moment, and it doesn't help
Paul,
Well a neg a print are going out in the mail to Shel today, so he can
give me an idea of what happened.
Bruce
Monday, April 22, 2002, 11:02:55 PM, you wrote:
SB Bruce Dayton wrote:
I have shot one roll of the 400 speed. What I got back from my lab
was not a pretty sight.
gfen,
Since it didn't get answered the first time, you better ask again.
Hopefully, one of us has the answer for you.
Brother Bruce
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 6:14:36 AM, you wrote:
g On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Who you callin' klunky, buster? The P67 is balanced like a
Printed and in the binder.
Thanks Bill
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
Mishka,
I'm thinking that 'Wilson' from the Castaway movie would count for a
portrait. :)
Bruce Dayton
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 6:40:50 AM, you wrote:
M so it doesn't have to be a face, does it
My Pocket Oxford Dictionary defines Portrait as:
'Painted, drawn, or photographic likeness
Hi Steve.I just left it on normal.I did not
use the velcro,although next to duct tape my
favorite product:),I secured it with a wide(ish)
elastic band.It held very well.If i was close to
the band member when i flashed him,i just dialed
down to 1/2 to help.(I pre fired at the light meter
over
http://harrysproshop.com/
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 08:18:36 -0400, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A while back someone posted info about a few sites in Canada that
specialized in mail order and which had good prices on med format gear.
Can't find the info. Any help out there?
--
Shel
Shel,
Here's the link to the one I am aware of:
http://harrysproshop.com
Bruce
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 5:18:36 AM, you wrote:
SB A while back someone posted info about a few sites in Canada that
SB specialized in mail order and which had good prices on med format gear.
SB Can't find the
Hi, gang
Yesterday, I developed a roll of TMZ in HC-110. When I finished fixing it I
noticed it was pink. My friend told me that the base of T-Max emulsions is
pink, and that it makes it looks as if it were not correctly fixed, and
gives headaches to novices thinking they are doing it wrong. Is
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Re: PUG ?
Oh good, we can do cats now! :)
I'll probably do a dog portrait
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Where's Mike Johnston when you need him
(kidding, I like cats!)
Christian
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 12:03, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Oh good, we can do cats now! :)
meow,
annsan
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
I just discovered, under some dusty boxes in the back of the shop, some 52mm
A style caps, new in their packets. GBP4 if any good to anyone.
Might swap for some 49mm/58mm OEM models.
And a new toy - not available in Pentax mount?? An Arsat 300mm F2.8 in Nikon
mount - considering I was
Hi Ken.I recently aquired a Super Program in February and,
although i like the camera,made the same discoveries.
It is a lot noisier than my K1000 or Spotties and i did
the same tests,all exposed very well.I shot some TTl flash
using Auto Ap. priority and bouncy(see Cotty)and all
exposed fine.
I
Purrfect.I think i have 1-2 cat portraits left.:)
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:02:17 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PUG ?
Where's Mike Johnston when you need him
(kidding, I like cats!)
Christian
I have the PUGster program put together by CETUS software. As
part of that special browser for pentax related information it
has a hotkey to get to the Pentax Lens Galery, that key is not
working. I have been using the Mirror site key which works.
Does anyone have the web address for
A fried of mine sent this to me today and I thought I would share it
with the group. It sure made me stop and think.
---
I have a friend who lives by a three-word philosophy: Seize the
moment. Just possibly, she may be the wisest woman on this planet. Too
many people put off something that
Ken Archer wrote:
Compared to my ME Supers and Spotmatics, the Super Program
is a real klunker, at least that is what it sounds like.
You lose stealth mode after the first shot.
:^) ... that's why you might as well use it w/ the Winder!
it will cover up that
A fried of mine sent this to me today and I thought I would share it
with the group. It sure made me stop and think.
---
I have a friend who lives by a three-word philosophy: Seize the
moment. Just possibly, she may be the wisest woman on this planet. Too
many people put off something that
Hi,
the opening scenes of the film 'Patriot Games', where the IRA people try
to kill or kidnap someone, were shot in the grounds of the Royal Naval
College, a couple of hundred yeards up the river from where I live.
http://www.greenwichfoundation.org.uk/
My house is a bit smaller.
I can't add
Duh, I shoulda thought of that. ;-)
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 01:46 pm, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Ken Archer wrote:
Compared to my ME Supers and Spotmatics, the Super Program
is a real klunker, at least that is what it sounds like.
You lose stealth mode after the first shot.
:^)
Hi,
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 2:21:16 PM, you wrote:
Still, Zeiss 80mm on a 'blad vs. Pentax SMC 105mm on a 67...the 105mm is
a lot cheaper and definitely harder to flare. You'd think that Zeiss
would know what they were doing with internal baffling etc.
Now, I'm not saying that the Zeiss
R. Monaghan's page is very nice, but that one about coatings is quite
bad IMNSHO.
An easy test will show that various MC and SC have much different
effects...
put a filter on your lens.
1) non-coated filter - BAAAD unless shooting without black coal in
black tunnel...
2) single coated filter
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
EVerything in my PUG folder just came up in duplicate
anyone else have this problem?
EVerything in my PUG folder just came up in duplicate
anyone else have this problem?
It's all in your mind, Ann.
It's all in your mind, Ann.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Paul ...
I have the little brother to the HN-13, the HN-12. Yes, it's designed
to use a Nikon polarizer, as it's a two-piece hood. However, I've used
,one as a regular lens hood with no problems just by leaving out the
Nikon polarizer.
Unfortunately, I don't know the thread size on the
Hi,
this question came up a few weeks ago and I sent a list of books with
some of my own thoughts about them. I no longer have the post, so I'd
be grateful if anybody who's saved it could repost it.
ALso, isn't the decisive moment at the heart of good photojournalism?
People have read too
Hi,
yes please. And if it can call a taxi at the same time that'd be
great.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, April 22, 2002, 8:58:46 PM, you wrote:
would you like it to beep you: bob, there's a great photo you are
about to miss, grab the camera and run to the intersection of A
On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 10:55 AM, Brendan wrote:
You send them to Photoclick so it is the same
actually, just you are far, but then photoclick knows
the channels for NPS, they got PC very right.
And here I thought you were talking about MY scans, not the cheapies I
send out...
Bob,
Well, the truth is that I'm sort of into nature photography!
... so while I might be tempted to take some photos of spectacular
architecture, it is not my passion.
Len Zedel.
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Bob Walkden wrote:
Hi,
the opening scenes of the film 'Patriot Games',
Thanks Bruce, Mishka ... That's the one I was looking for.
http://harrysproshop.com
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Paul, the Nikon polarizer has 72mm thread to fit the lens BUT the
shade has a 82mm (or 86mm) thread that screws into the polarizer. I
have this beautifull hood at home, but I have to find a step-up for
it.
Andre
Again I ask:
Can anyone tell me whether Nikon's HN-13 72mm screw-in hood will
Actually your scans can do bigger than 36x24
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 10:55 AM, Brendan
wrote:
You send them to Photoclick so it is the same
actually, just you are far, but then photoclick
knows
the channels for NPS, they got PC very
reminds me of a review of a (quite expensive sports) car i read a few
years ago.
there was a line about the stereo being lousy, but then, it continued,
that shouldn't have mattered because of the deafening engine roar...
g
:^) ... that's why you might as well use it w/ the Winder!
I find that the fancy K-mount rear lens caps
(that do have the extra lip) are desirable (and quite suitable)
for all Pentax K-mount lenses, especially for the A lenses and
newer.
Beware of the dreaded Pentax Taiwan (estra-lip) caps. The ones
I've seen all fit loose, probably because their
or...I should sayWAS spotted at the Henrys website last
week for $299CDN (how good was this price?).
Excellent price... They go for 500-600 US on eBay...
The used sales rep. at the store said they picked up the lens from someone
selling all of his/her Pentax stuff because he/she was
Interestingly, the article also mentions the 18mm lens
as to result from the joint development of Pentax and
Zeiss. I have never found a confirmation information
about that anywhere. However, I have a diagram of the
Contax Distagon 18/4. This shows that it's design is
exactly identical to that
When you ask, How are you?
Do you hear the reply?
someone told me a long time ago, one of definitions of
put-your-favorite-word-here is someone who, when asked how're you,
grabs you and starts going at lentgth about how exactly he is...
g
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
You didn't miss anything because this lens has Nikon mount!
Andreas Wirtz
Ken Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I saw this today with about 25 minutes to go
didn't have time to get
the German translated. Anyone have any experience with a Cosina
20mm...just in case another shows up sometime in
No!
Nick Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The BG-10 grip is now listed at BH as
being the grip for the MZ-S ~AND~ the
MZ-SD!!! Is this our long awaited digital camera?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go
I could be mistaken, but as I can see, Pentax do not seem to use
floating element design like the other manufacturers. I know Nikon
use it. Any idea?
I think that one of the Pentax lenses that may supposedly have
involved some Zeiss/Pentax collaboration is the the K 28/2, which
uses a
That's because you were on the Leica lists. The Leica users all hang out
here, because it is more interesting.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 5:08:45 PM, Bill wrote:
BDC David Brooks wrote:
I seem to have lost Aarons e mail on the comments
about which Fuji film is to which Kodak film.
BDC SHeeZ, dang those Fuji names! is the crypto
BDC ... NPS, NPH NPZ are the low-contrast
Cac And a new toy - not available in Pentax mount?? An Arsat 300mm F2.8 in Nikon
Cac mount - considering I was thinking about a 400mm F3.5 this seems to have
Cac saved my bacon. Of the Russian/Ukranian lenses, does anyone know if this
Cac comes in PK?
Oh lucky you :) I have seen this lens once
F Actually, though, it is not clear in my mind, but wouldn't IF
F lenses be, in effect, lenses that have floating elements (inasmuch
F as one or more elements move relative to the other elements when
F focusing)? Or, to put it another way, couldn't the term be applied
F to any lens that moves
I had lunch with the Pentax Rep today. He did not get away with just buying
me a bowl of broth this time. No, I insisted on a big New York Strip with
all the trimmings. It was hard to eat all that for lunch, but I manfully
persisted until it was gone. He is just like Santa Claus, everytime I see
...Or, the number of folks who ~wish~ they had a Leica, Shel!
I think drooling over Leicas is fair game, even on a Pentax mail list. At least
it's a camera that has no equivalent in the Pentax line. A completely different
animal...
regards,
frank
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You might be
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BDC SHeeZ, dang those Fuji names! is the crypto
BDC ... NPS, NPH NPZ are the low-contrast emulsions
Remember Kodak's VPS, VPH?
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
FYI,
Only one day left on these auctions:
http://www.gate.net/~hifisapi/JCO_AUCT.HTM
Items for Sale by jco (699)
Includes current auctions and Buy It Now items by the seller. Seller, view
high bidder email addresses .
1 - 13 of 13 total, Click on the column headers to sort.
Item Start End
JCOC stick with PENTAX. There is a guy on ebay
JCOC who installs new split image screens in
JCOC spotmatics for 59.99. Dont forget the
JCOC F3.5 wide angles are slow and have too
JCOC much depth of field to be easy to focus in
JCOC any camera.
JCOC JCO
Don't stick with Pentax ;-)
I have a Asahi
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1348399449
This should especially interest those who are getting into medium format!
But what would you use it for?
KC8TKA
*
KC8TKA
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
