Isabell.
=-D
Not sure about the music though. Great site and great photography, Dario.
Cheers,
Cot
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
Good to see another woman on the list :-)
Danke,
Cotty
Hi Katrin,
I'll help Cotty out here just in case you read his message as I did:
Steve (Cotty) is a 6'+ boy photographer :-)
LOL. Why thank you Rob, that's the nicest way anyone's ever described me.
I do like a little cross
Costs are comparable here in the Great White North then Bruce.For
a roll of 120 colour out of the Y-M(12 exposures) is $5.00 Can.
5x5 proofs are about the same $0.55.I can do a roll for under $14.00
Can if all come out.Sometimes i miss frome 12 in the Y-M.
I agree to Bruce that MF is more
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
We buy cars with nice accessories. Why not lenses?
Check out the filter!
Coz a $175 BIN is too rich for me.. however, I think I'll be watching this
for awhile, I wanted an FA50/1.4.
In other news, according to UPS, my new Pentax should be on my
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Kevin Waterson wrote:
120, 220, 70mm, polaroid. Supposedly NPC is coming out with a digital
back, but I haven't seen any announcement.
ok, what is the difference between these backs?
A 120 insert gives you 15 shots from a roll of 120, a 220 insert doubles
this with 220
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Anthony Farr wrote:
Afraid I don't know the word's origins, but I'm sure it's not an acronym,
and has no hidden meaning. If it's an abbreviation I don't know the full
word.
Works for me, I'd just never heard it before.. Is it a derogatory remark,
though?
--
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Yes, but you have to send me a quarter.
I'll send both of you a quarter if you quit bickering.
--
http://www.infotainment.org
The destructive character is cheerful. - Walter Benjamin
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Dario Bonazza 2 wrote:
There's an Italian word tirocinio which means apprenticeship, training, so
it has to do with somebody trying to learn something.
I'll accept this explanation, and now that I've got a history, can
cleverly insert the word into my vocabulary in an
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Kevin Waterson wrote:
I was considering a single use / disposable camera for a test
run.
Kevin, I carry a kodak max OUTDOOR single use with me regularly... just
for those times when
I've seen Kodak hyping up a new disposable camera they've produced
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, tom wrote:
120 and 220 are standard MF film sizes. The 645n gets 16 frames per
120 roll, 33 per 220. You need a different back for each because 120
Does the 645n manage to pull an extra frame that the 645 does not? Every
specification I've seen for 645 list it as being 15.
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Brad Dobo wrote:
Wassat, Brad?
I had to leave the computer for a second to take my daily dose of Geritol.
(I
think you ~have~ to be old to remember Geritol - anyone out there remember
Ted
Mack's Amateur Hour, sponsored by Geritol? I do...)
Time to have another
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Peter Alling wrote:
How to infect a digital camera. Build a worm that infects a PC. It does
nothing
except watch for a Digicam to attach to the PC, (easy enough to do).
When a digicam attaches emulate the twain driver while uploading a patch to the
camera, (this is
Things happen :-)
Good job, Doug! You've had and have your hands full and we all appreciate
it.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:57 PM
Subject: I'm not complaining, but...
Knowing that the
What scanner are you using, and what computer, OS, and scanning software?
Speaking generally, negative film has an orange cast, which has to be dealt
with by the software in the process of inverting the negative to a positive
image, so there are clearly some additional issues to deal with.
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Kevin Waterson wrote:
What range of film is available for the 120 back?
Without starting a war, what is a good film? eg
Do fuji make film for 645?
They do, I've used Reala 100 in my YM124 for colour alot, recently.
As for what's a good film? The only answer that seems to
In a message dated 10/9/02 11:33:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Really for what they cost and ease of use, etc, they are really fantastic
cameras. I know they don't suit most of us here (unless in unusual
circumstances or emergencies (when your backup's backup goes :))
My brother 2
-Original Message-
From: gfen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, tom wrote:
120 and 220 are standard MF film sizes. The 645n gets 16
frames per
120 roll, 33 per 220. You need a different back for each
because 120
Does the 645n manage to pull an extra frame that
In a message dated 10/9/02 11:57:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey ladies, gentleman and old-farts :),
Another email to get away from digital :)
I had a wierd thought. (I know, setting myself up for a stupid joke :)) I
was thinking about why the major camera manufacturers don't
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Cotty wrote:
4 -The new Hasselblad H1 is no longer 6x6, it's 6x4.5.
Indeedy-doody.
With lenses made by Fuji, not Zeiss (how do you pronounce that, anyhoo?)..
Its caused quite the uproad on rec.photo.mediumformat or whatever its
called.
MF users want top quality with good
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for your statement. I guess what CLA means, but could you please tell me
the long words of this abbreviation?
I agree with you that those cameras are worth the costs.
Clean
Lubricate
Adjust
--
http://www.infotainment.org
The
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, tom wrote:
Um, it takes 15-45 secs to get the film loaded in the insert depending
on what mood the film is in. To get the insert in the camera is just a
twist of a button.
And for someone who's never done it before? 45 minutes?
I managed to figure out the loading in my
Like these?
http://www.nikonmall.com/category.asp?search_id=4
I was thinking about why the major camera manufacturers don't
release a VHS tape series (or DVD) on how to use *their* camera.
On 10 Oct 2002 at 14:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Is it possible to find out in what year a camera was manufactured? I'm
just curious who the older is, my me/mx or me ^_^
Hi Katrin,
Without copies of the original purchase documents for the camera its not
possible to determine its
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Speaking generally, negative film has an orange cast, which has to be
dealt
with by the software in the process of inverting the negative to a positive
image, so there are clearly some additional issues to deal with.
i have had the most success
Is this the same analogy as whether to carry a
45-125/f4 zoom or just a plain 135/2.8 prime for the
long end?
Francis M. Alviar
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:12:06 EDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New lens got me thinking
Plain Text Attachment [ Save to my
It's most likely that this flare comes from the camera front, and is not a
leak through the back. The unflared (darker) strip along the edge is the
shadow of the film-gate or some part of the mirror box immediately next to
the film-gate's edge. There is a small chance that it's light leakage
On 10 Oct 2002 at 14:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Is it possible to find out in what year a camera was manufactured? I'm
just curious who the older is, my me/mx or me ^_^
Mine was bought new in 1981. I think you can only roughly date them based
on the years they were in production. The
yeah, that may be true, but the bad news is that the nikon list is
populated by mindless wienies.
At 01:24 PM 10/9/02 -0400, you wrote:
snip
So, I got this from the Nikon list (which can take a lickin' but keep on
tickin' - sorry Doug):
more snippage
- Original Message -
From: Shaun Canning
Subject: Mm
Someone want to lend me a couple a grand?
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1387520130
Read his shipping info and buy with confidence. NOT.
Even if I was interested in another lens for my little cameras,
I
Dario, Shaun and Rob have put a better definition to the word Tyro than my
own misty memory could manage. Yes, a keen student is more precise than
is a keen amateur.
There's definitely no slur involved, it's actually a quite neutral term,
emotively speaking.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-
I also tend to use the extremes rather than framing a shot with the zoom
capabilities. And there's no question that I would rather spend the
money on some good primes than on an expensive zoom. I tend to buy
zooms as conveniencelenses so the last thing I want is this expensive
heavy thing. I
- Original Message -
From: Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)
Subject: RE: OT: Not digital :) An interesting question
Like these?
http://www.nikonmall.com/category.asp?search_id=4
Nikon also used to put on a travelling road show called the
Nikon School (I don't know if the program is
- Original Message -
From: gfen
Subject: Re: OT: The Accessories
In other news, according to UPS, my new Pentax should be on my
door step
when I get home.. yay!
If it is there, buy a lottery ticket.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: gfen
Subject: Re: Photokina and Pentax - the future?
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Cotty wrote:
4 -The new Hasselblad H1 is no longer 6x6, it's 6x4.5.
Indeedy-doody.
With lenses made by Fuji, not Zeiss (how do you pronounce
that, anyhoo?)..
Its caused quite
- Original Message -
From: gfen
Subject: Re: Things more irritating than the missing dSLR
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Yes, but you have to send me a quarter.
I'll send both of you a quarter if you quit bickering.
Bruce accepts Paypal.
William Robb
Nikon has several different ones now:
http://www.nikonschool.com/
BR
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Nikon also used to put on a travelling road show called the
Nikon School (I don't know if the program is dropped, or if
Regina just doesn.t get it
Zeiss rhymes with nice.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... Zeiss (how do you pronounce that, anyhoo?)..
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, William Robb wrote:
Nikon also used to put on a travelling road show called the
Nikon School (I don't know if the program is dropped, or if
They do, my friend's mother and aunts attended one of these not more than
six months ago in the Lehigh Valley, PA area.
--
I agree,
The major-domo as used by the Vancouver Linux User Group and the old PDML took
hours for posts to appear. I've had replies to my posts appear ages before the
post reach my server(My emails are downloaded automatically every 5 minutes from
my server).
James
So I declare myself as hero of the day for choosing
a Pentax digicam instad of one of its competitors:-) Maybe there's
really something like loyality, at least in situations like these where
an objective decision between nearly identical products from different
manufacturers is impossible.
THE RESULTS OF THE PDML SMC PENTAX K-MOUNT EXTREME TELEPHOTO PRIME LENS
POLL:
1st place (32 points): SMC Pentax-FA* 1:2.8 300mm EDIF
2nd place (24 points): SMC Pentax-FA* 1:4 600mm EDIF
3rd place (20 points): SMC Pentax-A* 1:2.8 300mm EDIF
3rd place (20 points): SMC Pentax-FA* 1:4.5 300mm
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, it was written:
ALSO
Cord has a couple of AF200T flashes $19.95 ea.
Anyone want one?
This is one of those times I wish I understood flash, because I'd like to
pick one up, mainly because I've come to realize there's times where you
need flash, and the on-camera built-in
Hi Tim,
on 10 Oct 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
I hope that the Optio will arrive tomorrow or on Saturday...
Where did you order it from? I ordered one from Pixmania last week but they
I'm living in Germany and ordered it from Foto Koch (www.fotokoch.de).
I've ordered it 5 or 6 hours ago
Hello PDML
the list works properly again, so I can start the next poll, the SMC
Pentax K-Mount Macro Lens Poll
You are invited to choose 3 lenses among the SMC Pentax Macro lenses.
Please IMAGINE that you have no Macro lens for your k-mount camera.
Also IMAGINE that you have enough money and a
Hi everyone,
I want to acquire a wooden grip in 'fair' condition (no point in an as new,
as my 67 has some slight cosmetic damage) and prices seem to vary greatly.
Can anyone suggest a pay no more than figure, for one that would fit my
requirements?
Thanks,
Malcolm
I bought my MX in september 1977, body-no. 0500 921. It had a metal film holder.
Regards
Bernd
- original Nachricht
I'm not aware of any compilation of serial #'s and year of mfg. Those of us who bought
them new, and still can remember what year that was, could post that
I'm quite sure that the GS appears soon. It has a good price and might
be a real cash cow for Pentax in the christmas business. I don't remeber
the S30 prices, but wouldn't a 330RS or even a 430RS an alternative?
They provide many manual functions.
Only downside of the 330RS is that for
A100/f2.8 Macro
A*200/f4 Macro ED
F50/f2.8 Macro
--
I would be tend by high quality slower zooms, . . .
I think I meant to say I would tend to buy high quality slower zooms,
. . .
(I'll blame the spell checker 8^)
Hi Flavio,
Very nice and kind of cute, except for the harsh
lighting and the bluish lighting.
Also there are too many shadows for me, otherwise it's
a great idea.
Sincerely,
Ryan
I'll try again, just in case.
I had some replies but never saw my own message
either in the digests
or
as a
I wouldn't quite go that far. Good film scanned on a good printer will
still be better than an image from a 6MP DSLR. But they are close, no
doubt. Certainly close enough for my needs.
Sorry - that should, of course, read ' Good film scanned on a good
scanner...'
Cheers,
Cot
first it was a bit hard going but after a few times it was better.
when I stretch it then after about half a centimeter there's a bit
resistance but once over it it's normal until the end... maybe it is
because there is no film in it yet... but it seems to work because the
numbers on the picture
Thru the Windscreen by Facit - The impressionistic style works for me as
well as the colors from the umbrella.
Boom by Brendan MacRae - I submitted a lightning shot as well. I like
Brendan's because of lighting and detail on the cloud bottoms. Very
ominous.
I See the Light by Ken Waller -
Hayg Doug.Thanks for all the work getting the list back
up.I'm sure your pooped by now.
One quick question.Is the list not recognizing free email accounts?I'd like
to get my canoemail.com back on the list as it is easier to manage than
this one but no luck yet.Something
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:45:54 +0200
Arnold Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello PDML
the list works properly again, so I can start the next poll, the SMC
Pentax K-Mount Macro Lens Poll
umm, I use a bellows...
Kevin
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, it was written:
ALSO
Cord has a couple of AF200T flashes $19.95 ea.
Anyone want one?
This is one of those times I wish I understood flash, because I'd like to
pick one up, mainly because I've come to realize there's times where you
need flash, and the on-camera
Well, if portability is an issue I'd opt for the 100mm and the 200mm. I wouldn't
bother with the 85 or 120, cause they're too close to the 100. I'd go for the zoom if
flexibility was most important (and in overt photojournalism - i.e. when you're not
bothered that your subject knows you're
well, the 50mm is a pentax 1.7 (I own 2 of them now ^_^)
and the zoom is a albinar 1.38
On 9 Oct 2002, at 16:41, frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Katrin,
First, let me add my welcome to the list, along with the others.
Second, $115US (or thereabouts) for an MX, with 50mm Pentax lens, 80-200
You can pretend that's a soft-focus filter!
LOL that's the idea a 2-in-one lense... even better then a normal
uv filter *g*
**
Desertrose
Chris' Katrin's X Japan homepage! Please visit it!
http://www.xjapan.de
I found this page here...
http://members.iinet.net.au/~cam/serial/
mine mx has 919 and the me has 123
sorry for the stupid question, but which part is the film holder? my
english is not at it's best when it comes to photography.. but I hope
that changes soon ^_^
thanks
On 10 Oct 2002,
http://www.dariobonazza.com
I love London #19!
London #17 is my fave. What a wonderful juxtaposition!
I find #16 is the funniest...
--
Kevin Waterson schrieb:
the list works properly again, so I can start the next poll, the SMC
Pentax K-Mount Macro Lens Poll
umm, I use a bellows...
There is one bellows lens in the poll, the K100/f4 Bellows Maybe you
would be wanting that?
Arnold
1. FA*200/4 EDIF (one of my fantasy lenses).
2. A100/2.8 Macro (my current macro lens, a sweetheart that I also use for
portrait work when I want a part of someone's body or face).
3. K100/4 bellows (for work in the garden when I finally break down and get
the bellows for the LX and true
With lenses made by Fuji, not Zeiss (how do you pronounce that, anyhoo?)..
Zeiss rhymes with vice.
:-)
Cot
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
today I did something crazy. Inspired by the whole DSLR threads and
especially Cotty's digital adventure (that I'm following in his digital
diary - keep on writing, Cotty!), I have ordered a digital camera.
You dear sweet thing, Heiko. Bless you.
And you even did one better than me - you
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Cotty wrote:
I'm in bed with Darth Bloody Vader.
Watch out for the light sabre...
--
http://www.eighteenpercent.com - http://www.infotainment.org
photography - being no part of it
Deb wrote:
I also dig the athletic person in front
of the windmills at Essex. This could have been a
typical touristy shot of a buddy with the windmill,
but as it is, it's truly unique.
The story of that photo. I was touring Essex together with a friend of mine
and I had just taken a few
gfen wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Cotty wrote:
I'm in bed with Darth Bloody Vader.
Watch out for the light sabre...
Comparison with digital and film will you do..much will you
evaluatefilm is not of the dark side...
Malcolm
I'm interested in a flash if there's one still available..
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl collinb@@safe-t.net
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 7:17 PM
Subject: OT: Anybody want it?
Ektagraphic III A autofocus projector
125/3.2 Raynox lens One
Hi,
With a last name like fenstermacher, you'd think I'd have this German
thing down...
it's pretty easy really:
-ei- is like ice, lice, rice, nice, dice, mice, spice, Zeiss...
-ie- is like wiener, as in schnitzel.
alles in ordnung!
---
Bob
Thursday, October 10, 2002, 3:24:00 PM, you
ditto
Shaun Canning
PhD Student
Department of Archaeology
School of European and Historical Studies
La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, 3086.
Phone: 0414-967644
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 1:32
What was the size of the images that you were comparing?
Ken Waller
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: Photokina and Pentax - the future?
Consider the following:
1 - It is believed
I use the 100/4 bellows lens on an Auto Bellows A with my LX (FB1/FD1
finder). It's an amazing combination and I would recommend it to anyone
interested in quality macro photography.
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Tom Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Went into Cord lunch today. Saw a 20x30 color print
(real, not inkjet) made from a 6mp CCD digital.
In a word: Nice.
Very, very few edge artifacts from being digital.
The color depth just isn't quite as good as film,
but if done 11x14, there would be NO reason to
consider film.
And I prefer
Cord also has a Majestic tripod with some extension arms,
geared head, and Slik macro head. $150, IIRC.
Anyone interested in a nice heavy tripod?
Collin
- Original Message -
From: Christian Skofteland
Subject: Bellows, lens and LX (was: SMC Pentax K-Mount Macro
Lens Poll)
I use the 100/4 bellows lens on an Auto Bellows A with my LX
(FB1/FD1
finder). It's an amazing combination and I would recommend it
to anyone
interested in
Dario,
What a wonderful collection, super stuff.
James
Many companies have done just that; even Pentax. I have one for the PZ1
series cameras, which sure helped to decipher their frickin' manual, but
that's another story.
The video showed me that the PZ1 series of cameras are surprisingly easy to
use, unlike Pal's claim that 'they are the most
Perhaps only in the window-making business?
Collin O'Brendemuehl
:)
With a last name like fenstermacher, you'd think I'd have this German
thing down...
Hi Christian,
I have an LX with the FB1/FD1 combination, and have been thinking of getting
the FE-1 along with the bellows, but do you think I really need it?
thanks,
Tom
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:01:31 -0400
To:
This is something that I seem to miss:
I know that a print needs 350dpi ( 7lpmm, and a single line has to contain
at least two pixels across: black and white) to be critically sharp. OTOH 6
mp spread over 11x14 surface would yield circa 200 dpi - 4lpmm. Which is
slightly more than the half of the
FE-1 is fantastic, even without bellows. It's my second most-used finder
(guess which one is the first? :) The image is HUGE. The focusing is
precise. If you can get it --go for it.
Oh yes, it also doubles as a great 35mm loupe.
Mishka
- Original Message -
From: Tom Davis [EMAIL
Please don't refer to auctions here until they are completed. Some of us
are watching them. Some of us are serious bidders.
Paul Stenquist
Shaun Canning wrote:
Someone want to lend me a couple a grand?
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1387520130
Shaun Canning
PhD
thanks for that Jostein.
A very elaborate answer, which I hope I have understood fully.
I have a few doubts, which might seem silly... please bear with me.
* if I am going to depress the film rewind button and prevent the film from
advancing, why would I need to tighten the rewind crank with a
The last time I purchased a Pentax new was back in the early 70's when I
purchased a chrome model ES II. Today, I received a Pentax Optio 230 from
BH. BH had a better price so I decided to go for the 230. Anyone on
the list own one?
Jim A.
It's too bad they don't seem to be around now. I'd like to see the MZ-S
with various lenses and accessories put through it's paces. Every bookstore
I go into I look for Pentax books. They always have the book with the
'older' bodies, but never anything new, and nothing like the 'Nikon System
Too bad, it doesn't list the MZ-S in there...and I was going to buy it too
:)
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: Debra Wilborn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:44 PM
Subject: Oh yeah? Well mine's bigger! (was Re: Mm)
When I worked for
I own it Jim.
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject: New Pentax
The last time I purchased a Pentax new was back in the early 70's when I
purchased a chrome model ES II.
P.S. I have just spent a week in Tasmania with my customized backpack and
strap set-up, and it worked really well in the field. The pack is about a 45
liter Tatonka pack, which is heaps big enough, and in that I carried a
19-35mm, a 28-80 f2.8, an 80-200 f2.8, an FA 100mm f2.8, and an AF500
There really is no substitute for length and width...300mmx112mm is pretty
impressive in anyone's language. Whether you choose to use it or flaunt it
is another question entirely.
Shaun Canning
PhD Student
Department of Archaeology
School of European and Historical Studies
La Trobe University,
Vic,
It didn't even load for me...just sat there a minute or so. I finally
cancelled. BTW, I am running a DSL line so it should have loaded
reasonably fast.
This further confirms my dislike for anything AOL.
Bruce
Thursday, October 10, 2002, 9:52:25 PM, you wrote:
Pac Hey guys I'm
At 22:47 10.10.2002 -0700, you wrote:
Pac Hey guys I'm trying to get a website up and running on AOL using their
Pac software. Sometimes it loads quickly. other times it seems to take forever.
Pac Could a few of you try it and tell me if it's quick or if it takes forever.
Pac It's very early
Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
What scanner are you using, and what computer, OS, and scanning software?
Agfa Arcus 1200 (scsi), PC/Windows ME, Agfa Fotolook 3.6 (the latest
driver for the scanner). I've also tried Vuescan which does support my
scanner.
Speaking generally, negative film has
1: FA100 f/2.8 Macro. This lens is always mounted on one of my cameras.
2: FA*200mm f/4 Macro. A bit long and a bit slow but I might as well see
what all the fuss is about ;)
3: A100mm 1/4 Macro. I owned the screwmount version of this for a while.
Cheers,
- Dave
Anthony Farr wrote:
Have a look at the separate colour channels of the histogram of an average
scene (YMMV). If any of the channels looks either very compressed or
extended to the point of severe clipping then that channel needs its slope
adjusted to better match the others. This may be
Debra Wilborn wrote:
Here's a really simple, cheap test to find the leak.
And I know this from experience. :)
Thanks for the tip. It might be useful if I was getting the leak on
every frame :)
There's no film in the camera at the moment so I'll have a closer look at
it in the next
Hi Cotty,
on 10 Oct 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
today I did something crazy. Inspired by the whole DSLR threads and
especially Cotty's digital adventure (that I'm following in his digital
diary - keep on writing, Cotty!), I have ordered a digital camera.
You dear sweet thing, Heiko. Bless
Doug made a fantastic work with the list... mail goes
thru the list server now lightning fast...
Antti-Pekka
---
* Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D * GSM: +358 500 789 753 *
* Computec Oy Turku* FIN-20750 Turku Finland * Fax: +358 10 264 0777 *
Just had lunch with a good friend of mine. He got back last night
from a trip to Italy and the Greek Isles. Shortly before the trip, he
bought a Nikon D100 (already owned an N80) and the new Sigma 15-30
zoom to go with his 28-105 and 80-400 VR.
His experience was very mixed. In general, he
99 matches
Mail list logo
