Awoke early this morning in San Diego and went out just after sunrise.
members.aol.com/rfsindg/catch1.jpg
Caught using the *ist DS and the 80 mm end of the 80-200/2.8 zoom.
Camera selected f11 @ 1/1000 for a fine jpeg, resized for the web.
After some shots, I heard this blowing noise like a
Sorry, make that capital C, as in
members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch1.jpg
and
members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch2,jpg
Regards, Bob S.
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mar 14, 2006 2:21 AM
Subject: PESO: Today's catch
Awoke early this morning in San Diego and went out just after
Shel Belinkoff wrote on 14.03.06 8:20:
While talking with Marco last night at Godfrey's show (VERY nicely done,
BTW - and Godders is a fine host), he mentioned that he was playing around
with a Beta version of Adobe Lightroom. The program is not yet available
for Windows, and I'm wondering
Thanks Tom and Jens,
Well, it's not so difficult here to keep your head above the water. To
keep your head cool is more difficult sometimes.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 March, 2006 4:29 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE:
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/14 Tue AM 12:28:40 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photographers words - was: PUG comments, part 1
On 13/3/06, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
Roquefort.
Are Norwegians allowed to say that?
No. They
On 14/3/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
After getting bad wibes
I had those once, there's an ointment you can get
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 14/3/06, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry, make that capital C, as in
members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch1.jpg
and
members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch2,jpg
But without the comma:
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch2.jpg
;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:48 PM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
I hope it will be priced well below price of Apple's Aperture - I'm
hoping for
~200-250$ range, especially that Aperture has strange hardware
requirements
(on the one side it is enough to have Powerbook G4, on the other - it
doesn't
David Mann wrote on 14.03.06 10:11:
I suspect Apple are just trying to sell you newer hardware, as the
required hardware is pretty much what their current line offers.
Good luck to them then ;-)
On a more serious note, I suspect it has more to do with the video
card than the processor. I
I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I
really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fuji
RVP custom made for Kenny vs D200 shots
KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any form of
kenny-allergy. You will break out in livid
Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any thoughts?
I've been using it almost since day one. Most of the important points
have been mentioned already. The RAW treatment is the best I've ever
seen (I'm still on PS CS non-2). The b/w conversion does indeed knock
one's socks off.
I very much
David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aperture is aimed squarely at professional photographers, but I
suspect that Macr^H^H^H^H Adobe will set their sights on enthusiasts
as well, which means they'd hopefully price it a bit lower.
Or they'll come up with the usual two versions we know from
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote on 14.03.06 10:42:
I very much miss a function to move/burn files either using Lightroom
itself or at least with Lightroom being aware of it and I don't like the
copy automatically generated each time I forward a file to PS.
That would be indeed great - burning
Yep. And 160$ is a heck of a lot of women ;-D
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Terrazzino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/14/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/3/06, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry, make that capital C, as in
members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch1.jpg
and
members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch2,jpg
But without the comma:
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch2.jpg
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/14 Tue AM 10:16:43 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Another how to behave on eBay question.
Yep. And 160$ is a heck of a lot of women ;-D
I'm not sure your compatriot females will be happy, being granted the status of
Op Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:42:55 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yep. And 160$ is a heck of a lot of women ;-D
I'm not sure your compatriot females will be happy, being granted the
status of cheapest thing to buy in Norway.
8-
Cheap compared to booze. In Norway.
I
Yep. And 160$ is a heck of a lot of women ;-D
I'm not sure your compatriot females will be happy, being granted the
status of cheapest thing to buy in Norway.
Let's let Bill Robb be the judge of that.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Love the first shot. Beautiful light, nice composition. Second shot is
interesting but not particularly rewarding as a photograph.
Paul
On Mar 14, 2006, at 3:33 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch1.jpg
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Cotty wrote:
On topic. All shot with the K15mm f3.5...
http://www.cottysnaps.com/Greystones/march13.html
Seeing as you took on such a giant of a project, I should trust your
skills. But am I the only one concerned about the dryer?
Kostas
The 300mm f/2.8 Yashmar has been made sporadically in limited
quantities for some years. I wrote a test report on it for
Shutterbug something like ten years ago. Optically it is a copy of
an early Nikkor 300/2.8 . I found the sample I tested to perform
very well, but not up to the
On 14/3/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Seeing as you took on such a giant of a project, I should trust your
skills. But am I the only one concerned about the dryer?
Yeah, I know - the colour doesn't match the washer.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
This is more than an idea Fernando, it is a plan ;-)
Thanks!
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Terrazzino
- Original Message -
From: Derby Chang
Subject: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital
comparison
I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I
really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fuji
RVP custom made
Ahh!
BTW PS can't do vectored graphics. You'd need somthing like Illistrator.
Dave
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:56:34 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the..
Dave
You got it
Dave
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:33:28
On 3/14/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't see any coffee in the cup, but you sure captured that early morning,
get-outta-my-face-until-I-have-my-cawfee look ;-))
Thanks, Shel. Much appreciated. Christie takes her coffee with lotsa
cream and lotsa sugar. If you look very
On 3/13/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A photo of my wife taken just before Christmas, most likely with the
MX and M35/2.8. Tri-X, exposure unknown, and either HC-110 or Ilfosol
S. I think my memory has completely failed me.
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=281
She
He may be a fool. But if so, he is a funny fool. His analogy using bus and a
Ferrari is pretty clever. The bus is slow, but it can take a lot more load.
Displaying empty frames is also efficient communication; you got to give him
that.
This said. I don't make my decisions based on his
I don't feel anything at morning. I barely exist.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Well, such a large amount of video memory is needed mainly by 3D graphics.
To work at 1600x1200/32 bit in plain 2D only 8MB should be enough, 16 MB
with no problems. Yes, I know that Quartz uses 3D GPU to build some 3D
screen elements, but even then 32 MB should be
If you've made an offer on an item, Ebay provides a second chance offer
feature to the seller. He can contact you thru the system with an offer
just for you. If you have NOT made an offer, your only option is to contact
the seller using Ebay's message system. Then make your arrangements using
One more, and then I'll stop assaulting your senses for a while.
http://www.twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=282
Taken in December at a Christmas Tree farm near our home. From the
same roll as Morning Coffee. Thanks for looking.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to
But booze in Norway can be free!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4802928.stm
- Original Message -
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: RE: Another how to behave on eBay question.
Op Tue, 14 Mar
Adam Maas wrote on 14.03.06 14:15:
Quartz 3D in Tiger uses the GPU for almost all graphics (For example,
Quicktime 7 plays back on an OpenGL surface), and Aperture actually uses
the GPU for a lot of the basic image editing calculations,
For what? What 3D operations does aperture do to 2D
For what? What 3D operations does aperture do to 2D pictures? Please don't
tell me that GPU is used for image editing, because it is not true. Yes,
there were specialised graphic cards for Mac that had dedicated CPUs
accelerating many photoshop filters, but it was back in early nineties and
Wonderful photos, Walter. The F-16, since it's introduction, has
always been my favorite modern fighter. And who doesn't like a
Mustang?
As for the Starfighter, this is my favorite fighter of all time. It's
simply an elegant bird - meat and potatoes, no frills. I find it hard
to believe,
What's GPU?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Adam Maas
Quartz 3D in Tiger uses the GPU for almost all graphics (For example,
Quicktime 7 plays back on an OpenGL surface), and Aperture actually uses
the GPU for a lot of the basic image editing calculations, so it
requires a hefty GPU
Thibouille wrote on 14.03.06 14:47:
GPU can be used to do these kind of things as well as certain
mathematical operations.
Of course, only certain kinds of things are faster with GPU. But then
are they are usually a LOT faster.
Only certain operations not actual image editing. And I'm not
Shel Belinkoff wrote on 14.03.06 15:12:
What's GPU?
Graphics Processing Unit
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Graphics Processing Unit.
Dave
On 3/14/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's GPU?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Adam Maas
Quartz 3D in Tiger uses the GPU for almost all graphics (For example,
Quicktime 7 plays back on an OpenGL surface), and Aperture actually uses
I like the first one. Nice mood. Incredible color and good composition.
On 3/14/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Love the first shot. Beautiful light, nice composition. Second shot is
interesting but not particularly rewarding as a photograph.
Paul
On Mar 14, 2006, at 3:33 AM, Bob
I guess I'll smugle my bottle of tequila herradura reposado that I
just bought in my business trip to Mexico City and exchange that for
women while this market anomaly is in place; although my wife may not
enjoy the journey, how much you get for women again?
On 3/14/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL
Shel Belinkoff wrote on 14.03.06 15:23:
Is that the same thing as a video card, or something different?
No, it's a dedicated processor unit on graphics card that an do a certain 3d
graphics operations lightening from this work main processor - CPU.
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:12 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What's GPU?
Well, it's sure not GNU !
Bob
In what ways? What other RAW conversions have you seen or used besides ACR
2.4?
Shel
[Original Message]
(Ralf R. Radermacher)
The RAW treatment is the best I've ever seen
(I'm still on PS CS non-2).
Ahh!
See it makes sense know dose'nt it.g
BTW PS can't do vectored graphics. You'd need somthing like Illistrator.
Ok thanks. No need to buy a program for 1 measly Logo. They can convert it then
for me.:-)
Dave B
Dave S
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006
Hmmm ... that sounds very nice - at least the possibility sounds nice.
Marco mentioned that he liked the BW conversion, but I don't recall him
mentioning that the conversion could be done at the RAW stage. Converting
during import is a nice option. I assume that feature can be turned off,
or
All helpful stuff. I understand (generally) the advantages of shooting
Raw and intend to sort it out all day Sunday; (camera shop closed).
I'm looking forward to my impression at the end of the day.
This all may give me a reality prospective when the 10mp becomes avail.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi
Shel Belinkoff wrote on 14.03.06 15:38:
Hmmm ... that sounds very nice - at least the possibility sounds nice.
Marco mentioned that he liked the BW conversion, but I don't recall him
mentioning that the conversion could be done at the RAW stage. Converting
during import is a nice option. I
On Mar 14, 2006, at 3:41, Derby Chang wrote:
I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But
I really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of
4x5 Fuji RVP custom made for Kenny vs D200 shots
KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any
On Mar 14, 2006, at 5:37 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Quartz 3D in Tiger uses the GPU for almost all graphics (For example,
Quicktime 7 plays back on an OpenGL surface), and Aperture
actually uses
the GPU for a lot of the basic image editing calculations,
For what? What 3D operations does
I suspect it's more a just what are you up to -now-?
look.
Great shot, Scott!
Rick
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't see any coffee in the cup, but you sure
captured that early morning,
get-outta-my-face-until-I-have-my-cawfee look ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
The key is that video cards can contain GPUs, but not all video cards
do.
Godfrey
On Mar 14, 2006, at 6:46 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Sounds like the same thing as a video card, which has a dedicated
processor
for graphics.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Shel
Lightroom is all about workflow: Data Assets Management integrated
with RAW conversion. It's not an RGB editing tool, although if all
your editing happens in the RAW conversion stage it could be.
You can do BW conversion in Camera Raw too. Bruce Fraser talks about
it in Real World Camera
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Sorting out RAW conversion concepts and ideas is generally much more
than a day's work if you're starting from scratch, you can shortcut a
lot of the learning required with Bruce's book.
Godfrey
On Mar 14, 2006, at 6:41 AM,
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Adam Maas wrote on 14.03.06 14:15:
Quartz 3D in Tiger uses the GPU for almost all graphics (For example,
Quicktime 7 plays back on an OpenGL surface), and Aperture actually uses
the GPU for a lot of the basic image editing calculations,
For what? What 3D operations
For some reason none of the women on list contributes to this thread ;-)
Seriously, I can't say I blame them.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original
Graphics Processing Unit, which is the dedicated CPU that is the core of
any Video Card.
ATi Radeon's and NVidia GeForce's are GPU's (The card just holds them,
the Video RAM and any accessories like TV-Out chips).
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What's GPU?
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
Recommendation seconded. Best RAW workflow book, by a large margin.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Sorting out RAW conversion concepts and ideas is generally much more
than a day's work if you're starting from scratch, you can
Nice shot, love the punnish title.
-Adam
Scott Loveless wrote:
One more, and then I'll stop assaulting your senses for a while.
http://www.twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=282
Taken in December at a Christmas Tree farm near our home. From the
same roll as Morning Coffee. Thanks for
I've not gotten Fraser's book yet, as I was sans-digi for a while. Seems
about time to order it now ...
Someone pointed out the reviews over at Luminous Landscape. They provide
some good information. I've only just read some of the first article.
Here are the URL's for anyone interested:
So if I understand all this correctly, if I wanted to run Aperture on
my old G4 dual 867, the best upgrade I could make would be a kickass
video card?
Does it make sense that Lightroom has been released to battle Aperture,
to try to maintain Adobe's dominance in the photographic world?
Sounds like the same thing as a video card, which has a dedicated processor
for graphics.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Shel Belinkoff wrote on 14.03.06 15:23:
Is that the same thing as a video card, or something different?
No, it's a dedicated processor unit on
Appreciated suggestion!
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Sorting out RAW conversion concepts and ideas is generally much more
than a day's work if you're starting from scratch, you can shortcut a
lot of
Cotty wrote:
On 12/3/06, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Understand that the F-15 is about the baddest think in the air. True?
Hm.
http://www.raf.mod.uk/downloads/typhoon.html
It's a pretty close thing ;-)
Looks nice, but how could they have named it Typhoon???
Here's a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13/3/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
God dag mann, økseskaft
Slikkepott!!!
Nå tøyser dere fælt!
My, the Klingons are chatty today!
This was one of his more readable posts. Much of the time, I can't
stand him, but this was rather funny. I thought he made a pretty good
point out of showing the blank frames. I can think of many times that
I wouldn't have had the time for a 4X5 and would have to settle for
the digital.
Hi Scott
I like that one...
you cancontinue to post ;-)
greetings
Markus
One more, and then I'll stop assaulting your senses for a while.
http://www.twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=282
Taken in December at a Christmas Tree farm near our home. From the
same roll as Morning Coffee. Thanks
Dave Brooks wrote:
To the PDMLers attending GFM this June.
Logo is just about set up. One last tweak and inspection by one of our
Sr Units.g
Do you prefer a hat that has a sloped or contoured front like the link below,
or
http://www.barryskopitsales.com/LineNames.htm?CD=7172ID=66442
I
Hi!
members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch1.jpg
and
members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch2.jpg
Bob, you should consider adding http:// in front of your links and
properly spell - comma and colon can be disastrously different.
Catch1 is rather excellent photograph. Catch2 is, well, so-so.
I think
On 3/14/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't feel anything at morning. I barely exist.
Sorry, Tim,
There are no levels of existence. One either exists, or they don't
- no qualifications or modifications are possible.
Since you typed your post, I suspect you exist. (Dactylo ergo
ACDSee Pro - Any comments for Pentax DSLR usage?
I have ACDSee 7, hard drive failed and have used my limit on licenses. I'm
sure they would give me another but I haven't tried. I'm still looking for
the all in one like Adobe Lightroom enhanced with more Photoshop
features.
CS freaks me
I prefer the first style, but my wife hates the billboard hats so much
that I try to wear them as much as possible. Either is fine.
On 3/14/06, Dave Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the PDMLer's attending GFM this June.
Logo is just about set up. One last tweak and inspection by one of our
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:17:07AM -0500, Adam Maas wrote:
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
So if I understand all this correctly, if I wanted to run Aperture on my
old G4 dual 867, the best upgrade I could make would be a kickass video
card?
Does it make sense that Lightroom has been released to
Good, nice, etc, as many other has said ;-)
About the URL typo. To copy and paste directly from the browser winder is
the fool proof method when posting links.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C.
I prefer the first one, sloped style. In fact, I'll probably be
wearing one most of the weekend. :-)
-Mat
On 3/14/06, Dave Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the PDMLer's attending GFM this June.
Logo is just about set up. One last tweak and inspection by one of our
Sr Units.g
Do you
What about the new version of Adobe Photoshop Elements?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mark Stringer
ACDSee Pro - Any comments for Pentax DSLR usage?
I have ACDSee 7, hard drive failed and have used my limit on licenses.
I'm
sure they would give me another but I haven't tried. I'm
First type. Might I suggest a nice khaki color for the background?
Dave Brooks wrote:
To the PDMLer’s attending GFM this June.
Logo is just about set up. One last tweak and inspection by one of our
Sr Units.g
Do you prefer a hat that has a sloped or contoured front like the link below,
For the sake of justice.
Aaron. Are you reading the same article as me?
If you do, I find your conclusions a bit... odd.
He does not say 4x5 is a dinosaur and a bad choice.
He says he loves his D200 with IR, electric ignition, implemented coffee
machine and so on, for - it's _convenience_.
If I do (wife lets me) go for the 10mp..or?, I'll definitely obtain the
suggested book.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Recommendation seconded. Best RAW workflow
To the PDMLers attending GFM this June.
Logo is just about set up. One last tweak and inspection by one of our
Sr Units.g
Do you prefer a hat that has a sloped or contoured front like the link below,
or
http://www.barryskopitsales.com/LineNames.htm?CD=7172ID=66442
A more solid, stand up
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:17:07AM -0500, Adam Maas wrote:
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
So if I understand all this correctly, if I wanted to run Aperture on my
old G4 dual 867, the best upgrade I could make would be a kickass video
card?
Does it make sense that Lightroom has
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Christian wrote:
At the risk of being flamed He DOES have some nice pictures there...
Sure, but his premise and conclusions are odd -- since he didn't
buy/bring the correct 4x5 camera for the style of shooting he wanted to
do (run
In keeping with their meteorological theme, I believe they, also, had
one named Hurricane. I suppose Cyclone and Tornado were on the
list somewhere.
Jack
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 12/3/06, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Mark Stringer wrote:
ACDSee Pro - Any comments for Pentax DSLR usage?
I have ACDSee 7, hard drive failed and have used my limit on licenses.
I'm sure they would give me another but I haven't tried. I'm still
looking for the all in one like Adobe Lightroom enhanced with more
Photoshop
Oh..ya got me.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Oh yeah, well our P-51 can whip your Typhoon any ol' day..so there.
=))
Only because we let you have our Merlin engine to go in it :-P
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On
Thanks Paul, Fernando, and Godfrey,
I have other shots of that pair of boats with slightly different compositions.
They were cropped more tightly, but on review I liked the water on the edges.
And Paul you're right, the whale shot is a 'Gee wiz, look what I
found' rather than good photography.
Very nice sunrise. You managed to keep some detail in the boats,
which I like. The mood is wonderful. On the right edge it is a bit
overexposed and I see some minor flare, but all in all, nicely done.
I would be tempted to play around with that one quite a bit to see
what could be done with it
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4212438size=lg
Hope you get a chuckle out of this one, too. g
Thanks or looking.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
You have to know I would :)
Great grab, Frank..
Xo,
ann
Adam Maas wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Recommendation seconded. Best RAW workflow book, by a large margin.
Recommendation thirded :)
On Mar 14, 2006, at 7:04 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Because Lightroom doesn't use Image Units, Aperture does. Making
Lightroom far less dependant on GPU performance. Lightroom performs
much better on low-end hardware, while Aperture really shows off
what the high-end hardware can do, because
Derby Chang wrote:
I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I
really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fuji
RVP custom made for Kenny vs D200 shots
KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any form of
kenny-allergy. You
On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Christian wrote:
At the risk of being flamed He DOES have some nice pictures
there...
Sure, but his premise and conclusions are odd -- since he didn't
buy/bring the correct 4x5 camera for the style of shooting he wanted to
do (run 'n' gun, apparently),
On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
No. You need a new computer. The minimum requirements are a 1.8GHz
G5, which is dog slow running aperture. You need a kickass video
card in a new kickass computer.
Ho hum, it's always the way.
The dual G4 was purchased because the G3
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 12/3/06, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Understand that the F-15 is about the baddest think in the air. True?
Hm.
http://www.raf.mod.uk/downloads/typhoon.html
It's a pretty close thing ;-)
Looks nice, but how could they have named
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
So if I understand all this correctly, if I wanted to run Aperture on my
old G4 dual 867, the best upgrade I could make would be a kickass video
card?
Does it make sense that Lightroom has been released to battle Aperture,
to try to maintain Adobe's dominance in the
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch1.jpg
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Catch2.jpg
Please use in fully specified URLs like the above when you post
links, Bob. It's a lot easier for everyone.
Both are neat photos.
I love the feel and composition in Catch1 ... you got that morning
light
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
So if I understand all this correctly, if I wanted to run Aperture on
my old G4 dual 867, the best upgrade I could make would be a kickass
video card?
No. You need a new computer. The minimum requirements are a 1.8GHz
G5, which is dog slow running aperture. You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got a price for the suprise. Its a bit more than the last time i
didi this but reasonable i think.
One question. The place asked for the image to come as a Vector
image or Image ready image.
Can PS do either of these. If not, or if it can, but
On Mar 14, 2006, at 8:18 AM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
Does it make sense that Lightroom has been released to battle
Aperture, to try to maintain Adobe's dominance in the photographic
world?
Yes. And Lightroom, although it has lower minimum requirements,
still needs a very fast box. I would
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
