Just had a P67 55 f4 turn up in the post. It was an eBay purchase that cost
me AUD$250 (around US$190). Apart from small scratches in the paintwork it
is in fantastic condition. I think I'm going to have to shoot some rolls of
120 this weekend!
I've now got the 55, 75 (and 75 shift), 105, 135
It's an AF 500 FTZ - a TTL flash. I know the *ist-D is
supposed to have problems with flash photography, but I've
had fairly good luck with the 500. But I guess I'll have
to start thinking about getting a 540 - the 500 won't be
a lot of use on a K10D.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 09:08:23PM
Hello John,
I think it has a lot of potential, and I also would like to see some
darkening beneath the cloud as Rick said. I tried to make a quick
adjustment to show what I'm talking about
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/cloud.jpg
Did you shot this in RAW format? I would try to bring out as much
On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Bob W wrote:
Better get used to it. 35 is a man's prime, so I've stayed there for
years. 35 is also a woman's prime, come to that.
Sorry Bob but 35 is divisible by 5. 31 or 37 might be more suitable.
Having recently turned 10, I guess I'm past my prime.
-
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flattering pic of an icon.
Is that built-in flash or?
just the healthy glow you get from having a few
billion dollars in the
bank.
LOL!
-Brendan
On Nov 16, 2006, at 2:34 PM, John Celio wrote:
I turned 28 last month. Please don't tell me I'm the youngest
member (aside
from Cotty's inner child).
I stopped counting at 24...
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Nov 16, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Bob W wrote:
just the healthy glow you get from having a few billion dollars in the
bank.
All that money and he still hasn't bought a tie. Nice to see he's
got some sense.
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi Shel
That's good to know. I've never experienced that, but then, rarely
do I use filters. Do you know if that happens on other lenses, such
as the 15mm/3.5?
Not sure about other lenses, the only reason I know is Paul Stregevsky
(former PDML member) contacted me regarding a Sigma 16mm
On Nov 16, 2006, at 8:52 PM, Paul Ewins wrote:
I've now got the 55, 75 (and 75 shift), 105, 135 and 165 and that
is really more than enough.
I take it you haven't used the 45 yet. Trust me, you want one.
The old 300 is a nice lens, too. I've taken some of my favourite
photos with it.
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:53:02 -0500
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
being a computer history museum, i hope there is a footnote
somewhere there about statements like 640k ram is enough for
anyone and the internet is just a passing fad... :))
Hardly. See, for example:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06111603nikond40handsonpreview.asp
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/15 Wed PM 10:47:49 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: [OT] Computer geeks: Hardware help requested
John Francis wrote:
Nowadays I don't think it's worthwhile putting your own system
together unless you want
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/15 Wed PM 11:33:40 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: [OT] Computer geeks: Hardware help requested
No, you don't.
You look more like an I have the boxes here somewhere guy ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just
Heya
running like mad the past couple of days. almost ready to take off in
the morning, about a day later than I'd hoped but so it goes.
yup, i'll be priusing. will let you know how it does. ;-)
I'll likely not want to stop until I get to Nevada by the time I get
out of here, but if I do
I am not a Nikonian, but how many lenses are there with AF motor in
the lens compared to grand total number of Nikon lenses that could be
mounted on this camera?
This is not a trolling question, merely my curiosity.
On 11/16/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
element. I've had a MIR 20mm as well, neither the MIR or Tokina seemed as
good as the K 18mm IMHO and apparently both are longer than their stated
focal length, although I cannot confirm this.
I think the K18 is also more of a 19; I seem to have
On 15/11/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I jumped in recently because I'm getting tired of this shit.
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On 15/11/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is all getting to be a little too much
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I think the K18 is also more of a 19; I seem to have read this on
the list at some point.
Yes, I think you may be right there. To be honest I rarely use anything
wider than 24mm on film unless I need to. Each year I have to shoot large
groups on people at work and occasionally I need
just the healthy glow you get from having a few billion
dollars in the
bank.
All that money and he still hasn't bought a tie. Nice to see he's
got some sense.
- Dave
You don't need a tie when you're the 500lb gorilla in the room
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
That's great news. It means our Kenny can do a hands-off review of a
real camera instead of a hands-off review of vapourware. That's got to
be progress, surely.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dario Bonazza
Sent: 16
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought I'd share this one - a quick snap I took
a few hours ago at the Computer History Museum.
http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/BillAndJohn.jpg
being a computer history museum, i hope there is a footnote
somewhere
there
If I keep the camera at a constant distance from the
subject, I agree with you. But if the subject has the
same magnifaction in the finder, I don't.
You haven't mentioned that yet in this new diatribe.
-Lon
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I never said it was always a problem, I said its
harder to
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/16 Thu AM 06:53:29 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Metz flash repair in australia
I have several metz 45 CT series flashes and like most of them in the
world, the battery packs are dead and no longer hold
Very interesting. In 1978 I bought a system HP 2000 (running RTE III)
for my Institute. It cost $175 000 and had a 15 mbyte hard drive the
size of a washing machine, a reel to reel tape drive, a paper tape
reader and 196 kbytes of memory. To do a 256 x 256 FFT -- masking -- and
back TTF took
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?
I sold my 105 some time ago. I could try it with a 90. But I would
never focus any lens at f8. What's the point?
Whats the point of 90% of the traffic
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
Yes, I think you may be right there. To be honest I rarely use anything
wider than 24mm on film unless I need to. Each year I have to shoot large
groups on people at work and occasionally I need something as wide as the K
18mm.
I think it's great
This one time, at band camp, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do it yourself...
An example:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//pentax_nicd_pack/
Sadly I tried, but the result was a damaged battery holder. The base
of the Metz battery pack is very fragile.
Kind regards
Kevin
--
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:01:02 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought I'd share this one - a quick snap I took
a few hours ago at the Computer History Museum.
http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/BillAndJohn.jpg
being a computer
I picked up an MZ-5n today, sadly, it was a replacement for my MX
under warranty, as the MX had tripped over the Lemon clause in its
extended warranty due to my repeated attempts to get the metering
on/off switch repaired (the last attempt came back 'No Trouble
Found' when the meter is
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip a 15 mbyte hard drive
Looks like you win the my computer was less capable than yours argument by
about 9 orders of magnitude.
8-)
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/prefixes.html
-
Email sent from
sadly, I no longer have the MX.
-Adam
John Whittingham wrote:
I picked up an MZ-5n today, sadly, it was a replacement for my MX
under warranty, as the MX had tripped over the Lemon clause in its
extended warranty due to my repeated attempts to get the metering
on/off switch repaired (the
Not necessarily, I did my first serious work on a Fox Z80. No drives, 4K
of RAM, all programming was via keying in hand-assembled hex. Rather
nice embedded training system. I was glad when I started to do PLC work
though, far easier to work with.
Nowadays I smack spammers for a living and
No, you're mistaken, I did mention that already
in the thread. I not only stated all else
being equal a bunch of times, I also stated the
zoom example ( focus on your subject at longest
setting and then zoom to desired focal length- which
is focusing at same distance),
I also specifically stated
WR is the one who snapped with his totally uncalled
for fuckface comment posts. That's snapping. He ought to be the one
being filtered or banned, not me.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
keith_w
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:50 AM
- Original Message -
From: Don Williams
Subject: Re: PESO - a gathering at the museum
Very interesting. In 1978 I bought a system HP 2000 (running RTE III)
for my Institute. It cost $175 000 and had a 15 mbyte hard drive the
size of a washing machine, a reel to reel tape drive, a paper
He did that when it leaked 2 weeks ago.
-Adam
Bob W wrote:
That's great news. It means our Kenny can do a hands-off review of a
real camera instead of a hands-off review of vapourware. That's got to
be progress, surely.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's a major issue. While all but one DX lens is AF-S (The 10.5mm fisheye
isn't), the only low-budget lenses that are AF-S are the 18-55's and the
55-200. Because the lowest-end of the film Nikons have never supported AF-S,
all the other low-budget lenses are screwdriver AF, even 3rd party
Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06111603nikond40handsonpreview.asp
Dario
I'm conflicted on this. It's got some nice upgrades: ISO3200, 9 RAW buffer,
SDHC support, improved VF [95% at .8x pentamirror instead of the .75x of the
D50,D70 and D100] and the self-timer
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/16 Thu PM 01:18:15 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - a gathering at the museum
Not necessarily, I did my first serious work on a Fox Z80. No drives, 4K
of RAM, all programming was via keying in
Hmmm another comment that has slipped through my filter. OK, I can't
let this pass as, iirc, JCO made this comment several times:
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Lastly I use the zoom example
because its the easiest and fastest
way to make the comparison, changing
primes makes for a
_our_ Kenny, puleeze, don't pull him over to our side.
Bob W wrote:
That's great news. It means our Kenny can do a hands-off review of a
real camera instead of a hands-off review of vapourware. That's got to
be progress, surely.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Of course, JCO has the option to filter or not respond to posts as well ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: keith_w
Wouldn't it be better to just filter all messages from him?
Might help maintain your sanity.
You guys keep baiting him, and then get pissed when he snaps back.
Plonk him
.. equipped with a specially designed 3x 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX
Zoom-Nikkor lens ...
Phew - that's quite a mouthful.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Dario Bonazza
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06111603nikond40handsonpreview.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
So Nikon has released a budget body and has no budget lenses that are
fully compatible. Interesting marketing move.
Adam Maas wrote:
That's a major issue. While all but one DX lens is AF-S (The 10.5mm fisheye
isn't), the only low-budget lenses that are AF-S are the 18-55's and the
55-200.
Well, they do have the two 18-55's and the 55-200. But nothing else. And the
70-300G is a better deal than the 55-200 (cheaper, more range, similar
performance, but unusable as a MF lens due to having the worst focus ring ever
put on a lens).
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
So Nikon has released
beats me, ask Don, he had one, not me ;-)
-Adam
mike wilson wrote:
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/16 Thu PM 01:18:15 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - a gathering at the museum
Not necessarily, I did my first serious work on a Fox Z80. No
On 11/15/06, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought I'd share this one - a quick snap I took
a few hours ago at the Computer History Museum.
http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/BillAndJohn.jpg
That's a lot of money standing there!! ;-)
Terrific shot.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a
How is one able to tell what the exact focal length of a given lens is?
Or, more precisely, how do we, without appropriate testing equipment, make
that determination?
As an aside, Leica marks the exact focal length of some of their lenses on
the lens barrel. Even though the lenses are the same,
Well, it does cut down on 3rd party lens sales. Only Sigma makes
AF-S-compatible lenses (HSM) and their cheapest HSM lens is the 30mm f1.4,
which isn't exactly low-budget.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
But you get my drift.
Adam Maas wrote:
Well, they do have the two 18-55's and the 55-200.
But you get my drift.
Adam Maas wrote:
Well, they do have the two 18-55's and the 55-200. But nothing else. And the
70-300G is a better deal than the 55-200 (cheaper, more range, similar
performance, but unusable as a MF lens due to having the worst focus ring
ever put on a lens).
-Adam
On 11/16/06, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having recently turned 10, I guess I'm past my prime.
There are 10 kinds of people, aren't there? :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 11/16/06, Paul Ewins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just had a P67 55 f4 turn up in the post. It was an eBay purchase that cost
me AUD$250 (around US$190). Apart from small scratches in the paintwork it
is in fantastic condition. I think I'm going to have to shoot some rolls of
120 this weekend!
It also cuts down on the after market lens sales for Nikon, and makes it
a poor choice as a backup body for the less well heeled professionals.
Now if Nikon had a raft of budget AIS lenses available it might be a
different story.
As an aside, the Ken Rockwell® non review of the D40, set off
Thanks for all the nice words, folks.
Bruce,
the scene was quite chilling but not really angry. Waves weren't more
than up to 1 meter high. :-)
Seriously, the weather was quite nice and the sun was setting, so the
colours were definately there. The shot is two stops underexposed, and
further
That should be AF-S not AIS, I should really read these things before I
hit send.
It also cuts down on the after market lens sales for Nikon, and makes it
a poor choice as a backup body for the less well heeled professionals.
Now if Nikon had a raft of budget AIS lenses available it might be a
nice shot.
My thoughts were the same as Boris'.
I suspect that hint of peach colour in the sky towards the sunrise was
stronger in real life than on the photo?
Jostein
On 11/4/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from my trip to the IoM ... Early morning, I managed to get
mike wilson wrote:
snip a 15 mbyte hard drive
So what precise use _is_ a 15millibyte hard drive?
grin
My favorite misuse of metric prefixes, which, as a runner, I see all
the time, is K for k. I get lots of entry forms for 5K races. I
tell them that I never go running when it's that
If you have a reference lens ( like the ones marked by leica ) , you can
compare the
relative magnification of a very distant object of the
test lens vs the reference lens and use that ratio as
the coefficent of the ratio of two focal lengths to
calculate.
jco
-Original Message-
From:
Sure I can explain this, I already have as a matter of
fact. What you are talking about below is the ABILITY
to focus accurately, not the ease at which you could
do it. Like I said earlier, the wider lenses take more
concentration, more time to achieve a confident result, are easier to
make a
Ralf,
Once again a great shot. I have only one complaint about this pic. In
fact it's a bit of a complaint about all your pics... For being such a
heavy industry area, it looks far too pretty. :-)
Btw, your work reminds me of the work of Knut Bry on the factories in
Nikel, Russia.
Jostein
On
That looks cold with the frost even growing on the wall planks...
I like the muted colours and, as you say, the way it blends in with
the equally frosted trees.
Jostein
On 11/16/06, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/?p=153
Taken at a friend's farm on the
With no battery compatibility, it's already mostly useless as a backup body.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
That should be AF-S not AIS, I should really read these things before I
hit send.
It also cuts down on the after market lens sales for Nikon, and makes it
a poor choice as a backup
A list is only as good as the composite of it's members. I've joined a
number of other lists recently. Frankly I'm amazed how worthwhile they are
and how next to worthless this one has recently become.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
It was used for holding the micro data calculated during processing
density arrays (FFT) on microbes and virus particles. One of the HP
(25000um) drives would be more suitable these days of course.
D
Adam Maas wrote:
beats me, ask Don, he had one, not me ;-)
-Adam
mike wilson wrote:
Very damp and intense moment there.
Beyond the little nits on the thumb and stuff, you have a real winner
there, Tim. Congrats!
Jostein
On 11/15/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working on some photos for a mini rock photo show. It was a
seminar for rock festivals, and I was
Some monitors claim to be capapble of displaying 16.7 million colors while
others claim 16.2 million. 8-bit vs. 6-bit as I understand it. Any REAL
difference in actual use?
I see some monitors that have virtually identical specs... hard to compare
and decide.
Any real difference between:
Hi!
This time I am going for something slightly more abstract.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=15698
Any comments will be appreciated.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
nice shot.
Looks like a Guelder-rose:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viburnum_opulus
Jostein
On 11/15/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5209774size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I, for one, enjoyed this tour very much, David
but then I'm very partial to cute froggies :)
ann
David Nelson wrote:
G'day,
If anyone remembers me and is interested in what I've been doing for a
little while, photography-wise and to some extent writing-wise, have a
look at my photoblog:
I like it. Pity about the modern electrical box,
though; it's a distracting element.
Rick
--- Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/?p=153
Taken at a friend's farm on the weekend.
Pentax *ist DS w/ 77ltd, 1/1500 @ f/6.7
Comments, critiques, bricks,
You know the dimensions of the sensor, you can put up a tape measure on
a wall and take a picture at a fixed distance (to the focal plane), see
what the magnification ratio is by looking at the picture and seeing
what the resultant height of the image is, use the ratio to compute your
focal
Nailed it, Ken -
Love the early snows with glowing aspen.
ann
Kenneth Waller wrote:
This PESO is being posted in response to David's Savage's request.
Hope it fills the bill.
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in southern Utah on Boulder Mountain
Boris,
Think I'd like even more as an abstract if the left side tile where
not raised.
Lack of scale information adds intrigue.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
This time I am going for something slightly more abstract.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=15698
Scares the hell out of me
I think I needs some seasick meds :)
You really captured the quality of danger in the ocean -
not sure if that was your intent - you may be braver than I
am
ann
Jostein Øksne wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/waves.html
All kinds of comments/critique/flames
I like this a lot, Bruce
It could work as a book illustration - has a kind of Maurice Sendak
quality to it
I'd be interested in seeing the almost black and white color shot.
ann
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Not my usual kind of shot. The lighting really caught my attention.
Pentax *istD, DA
That should make the papers, John
Terrific photo journalism shot I think
ann
John Francis wrote:
Just thought I'd share this one - a quick snap I took
a few hours ago at the Computer History Museum.
http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/BillAndJohn.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Striking!
Tom C.
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Surface
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:11:33 +0200
Hi!
This time I am going for something slightly more abstract.
On 11/13/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not my usual kind of shot. The lighting really caught my attention.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm
ISO 800, 1/30 sec @ f/6.7, handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3831bw.htm
Comments welcome
I think it's a tremendous photo,
Boris, I have to say I can't get into this one --
I think it is because the motion of the child and the
background are at kinda the same speed - so it all
mushes together. I keep trying to focus looking at it.
I think if there were less contrast amoung the elements in
the
background it might
On 11/15/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/waves.html
All kinds of comments/critique/flames welcome.
Thanks for looking.
I love seascapes. I can almost feel the wind, the saltspray on my
cheeks. I can feel the power of the sea.
Great shot, Jostein!!
On 11/14/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5209774size=lg
That's very nice, I like the simple composition and clean colors
rendering.
I think Godfrey sums up what I'd say about it.
On 11/16/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
This time I am going for something slightly more abstract.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=15698
Any comments will be appreciated.
I love it
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
Tom, I believe that very question was answered by Godfrey a couple days
ago. Must be in the archives.
As I remember it, the superior appearance afforded by the 16.7M is
obvious to the eye.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some monitors claim to be capapble of displaying 16.7 million
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 10:41:41AM -, Bob W wrote:
just the healthy glow you get from having a few billion
dollars in the
bank.
All that money and he still hasn't bought a tie. Nice to see he's
got some sense.
- Dave
You don't need a tie when you're the 500lb
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 01:36:00PM +, mike wilson wrote:
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip a 15 mbyte hard drive
Looks like you win the my computer was less capable than yours argument by
about 9 orders of magnitude.
I can play at that game.
The first computer I
If so, it wasn't the one I asked.
While I have no doubt that an 8-bit monitor is technically superior to a
6-bit monitor, since no picture contains anywhere near 16 million colors, I
would bet huge amounts that an individual could not tell simply by looking
at the image on two side by side
On 11/13/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=15682
All comments welcome!
Thanks.
That photograph is pure joy
One of your best (and you've had many terrrific ones).
(of course, I ~would~ love it, wouldn't I?)
vbg
cheers,
frank
--
That's a really interesting image - it almost looks like a monochrome image
with some brown colour added.
I agree with the comment about the modern electrical fittings - I tried
cropping them out but I don't think the composition works as well as the
original.
Cheers
Brian
On 11/16/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some monitors claim to be capapble of displaying 16.7 million colors while
others claim 16.2 million. 8-bit vs. 6-bit as I understand it. Any REAL
difference in actual use?
I think the biggest place you'll see the difference in is in color
gamut.
No comments so far. I'd better post a bait post.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Øsleby
Sent: 15. november 2006 19:13
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: PESO - The Bluesmann and his
The papers used a shot of Bill in a tux later that evening
at the Tech museum. I was shooting for the Computer History
Museum, though, and my shot works far better for them: the
other person in the picture is John Toole, CEO of the CHM.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 01:16:36PM -0500, ann sanfedele
Juan, have you traveled to Australia recently? ;-)
Thumbs up!
Boris
Juan Buhler wrote:
Nowadays, the only way to take pictures of kids in the street is when
you are sure the parents won't see you:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=633
(just kidding btw--always make sure
Hi!
Pulling some older photos up for a project, I found this one from the
Windmere Aviation Museum in the UK that I took last year. It's made a
splendid 11x14 print...!!
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/36.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
Fascinatingly
Hi!
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5209774size=lg
Paul, can you please re-shoot it with just a bit of snow for Winter
Berries?
I really like it.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi!
Not an origonal idea obviously, as I saw a similar pic here. It made me want
to try my on. Was in NC this past week and the leaves were in abundance, so
tried my luck. I like the result very much, so a big thanks to the origonal
poster here!
Hi!
I've decided to really try to come to grips with the 32bit hdr function in
photoshop
CS2. the tricky part is working the curve when converting back down to 16
bits.
It's very easy to get awful results and quite hard to get good results.
This was shot Sunday evening at Darling
Nice one, Boris. :-)
Jostein
On 11/16/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
This time I am going for something slightly more abstract.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=15698
Any comments will be appreciated.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi!
Things are beginning to settle with the new 617. I hope I have now made
all mistakes which can be made. The 90 mm Grandagon was apparently
faulty (lack of sharpness in the corners) and has been replaced by a
8/90 mm Nikkor.
I've sure had a few good lenses in my time, the 85 and 250 mm
Hi!
A slightly trite city skyline shot
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/296936246/
K100D, 16-45 [EMAIL PROTECTED], 20 seconds at f8 and ISO 200.
large version for non-Flickr types:
http://static.flickr.com/103/296936246_cabe325514_b.jpg
Trite or not - but it is pleasant to look at.
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
