On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:33 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Too many GESOs are far too large, repetitive, and tedious. It's common to
see a dozen shots of runners/cyclists/motorcycles/race cars going around the
same curve, from the same angle, in the same light. Galleries of a dozen
shots of the same
Thank you, Tim.
-bmw
On 11-06-27 1:02 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
Oh gosh that's nice; full of peace. -T
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Bruce Walkerbruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Seen on an ostensible dog-walk this evening. Dog was unimpressed.
http://goo.gl/hovrC (Flickr lightbox)
On 11-06-27 1:23 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
Really, that's all, just an orange circle:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/06/26/-big/RUNE1770.jpg.html
-T
I like it. But this may explain why Burnhamthorpe, the main E-W road
here, is so badly falling apart always: it's missing those nails
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz wrote:
BTW I'm sure you don't intend these to be hard rules.
I wouldn't want PDML to become too snobbish :)
Teacups must be held with the fingers to the front and back of the handle (not
looped through), and the pinky curved
On 6/27/2011 03:09, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I sat on the bench behind my garden tonight. There's a finch feeder
in the garden, and finches both house and gold darted in and out,
along with the occasional chickadee. A hummingbird hovered in front
of me as he studied the various blooms that he might
My wife has a flip phone and likes to cradle her phone on her shoulder
so she can do things while talking. She is getting a smartphone but
these are much less comfortable to use in this fashion. I'm thinking
of getting her a headset. It doesn't have to be super stealthy, but
it must be very
Someone should run through the thread and tally the votes.
I nominate Tim.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Another vote here for the 50-135. No, I haven't measured, that wind
blowing flapping your undies is my arms waving.
Often perceived sharpness is a
Same here, and a few racoons too! Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
FWIW - I'm able to attrach numerous woodpeckers - of the hairy downey ype
- to my back yard by simply hanging a suet cake from a tree.
Kenneth Waller
I have the Motorola bluetooth device that Verizon sells for about $75. It hangs
from the ear and is nearly invisible. I use it to conduct interviews, and it
works well.
Paul
On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:26 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
My wife has a flip phone and likes to cradle her phone on her
Stan,
Have you tried cutting Oranges in half for the Orioles?
We got some great shots in the film days that way.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
They totally ignore our suet cake but we have a pair of downey + a pair of
hairy
I'll try that.
Dave
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Nice composition but IMO it would be a touch stronger with about half the
space from the RH side of the barrow to the RH edge.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
-
Nice find, and well recorded.
I assume that nail is a survey mark.
Dan
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Really, that's all, just an orange circle:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/06/26/-big/RUNE1770.jpg.html
-T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Grainy but nice. Phones aren't that far away . . .
Mine is right here beside me:-)
Dave
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Jeffery Johnson
jefferytjohn...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Now shame on you she is wondering
Very nice set.
Dave
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Not a very productive week photographically. The first three are the best I
can muster:
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 3:49 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA*16-50@28mm, 1/50s, f/4-0, ISO400 (at 9pm June 17).
I feel wet.
Dave
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice find, and well recorded.
I assume that nail is a survey mark.
Dan
In my opinion i would say yes.
Dave
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Really, that's all, just an
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13549553
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13549572
From Saturdays CARD affair.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13563072
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Thanks. I'll give it a look. She likes to talk on the phone while
working in the yard pulling weeds and such.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I have the Motorola bluetooth device that Verizon sells for about $75. It
hangs from the ear and is
Watch the radiation, especially if you notice a greenish tinge to your skin.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Grainy but nice. Phones aren't that far away . . .
Mine is
The feeder we use dispenses sugar water and grape jelly. The jelly is a BIG
hit. It could also accommodate an orange half but we haven't tried that yet.
When we got it, I hung it from the rafter on a convenient hook, just outside of
the screened porch. It just isn't a location that provides
I like it. One might take a little off the left, and add about a half-stop of
exposure.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Peso Red
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Barbara
Jawbone makes very good wireless headsets, as does Plantronics.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I'll give it a look. She likes to talk on the phone while
working in the yard pulling weeds and such.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Paul
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss before I could see the
picture. This is unacceptable behavior and, sorry folks, I just ain't
clicking on any more photo.net links.
FYI, for those folks depending on photo.net hosting,
Really, it can't be that difficult or tiring to actually click on a
x, is it? Oh well.
Dan
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss before I could see the
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I like it. One might take a little off the left, and add about a half-stop
of exposure.
Rick
Thanks Rick. I had taken some off the left but i'll try and see what that does.
When i added the vignette effect, it darkened
I told those idiots to shove it a year or more back when they started
censoring posts in threads, in addition to annoying me with stupid
advertising all the time. It's become a waste of time and energy to
deal with photo.net: they've become a crass marketing organization,
not a photography site.
it's not difficult, but it's behaviour from photo.net that's in your face and
offensive. More often than not when I click to see someone's picture on
photo.net and the ad pops I just think 'Well, fuck you', and click out.
There are plenty of hosting sites that don’t shove this crap down
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
From: Tim Bray
Thanks to everyone who commented.
B
Very nice set.
Dave
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Not a very productive week photographically. The first three are the
best I
can muster:
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/
B
--
PDML
[sending this again just in case. I've gotten two if no one else will
take it emails, and I know a lot of people don't check the list on the
weekends.]
I've got an Epson Stylus Photo 2200 that I never use anymore. The
printer was a refurb that the camera shop I worked at got for free, and
I
On Jun 27, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Bob W wrote:
Thanks to everyone who commented.
B
Not a very productive week photographically. The first three are the
best I
can muster:
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/
B
I am still pondering the riverside shot and the tablesstools. I am not sure
I second Plantronics. I also have a Motorola MiniBlue H9 but the
contacts in the charger/carrier base broke after a very short time so
I wasn't happy.
2011/6/27 Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com:
Jawbone makes very good wireless headsets, as does Plantronics.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:56
My wife got a Plantronics Voyager Pro+ almost a year ago.
If you're planning to use it outdoors it's worth getting
a model with noise cancellation.
The Pro+ also supports A2DP profiles, so it can be used as
headphones as well as a phone headset - in fact it can pair
with two separate devices
I concur with Rick.
Dan
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
On 2011-06-27 07:26 , Steven Desjardins wrote:
Any suggestions? I'm willing to spend up to about
$125. If this is too low, I'm willing to re-evaluate.
my partner's quite happy with her Plantronics 975, which she has used a
few times per week for a year and a half; it is very compact, has a
I've been pretty much photographically bored lately. Not much
insperation, plus I wasn't able to find the time to read the list much
the last few months, (still at least 7000 messages behind).
However I a few months ago I posted a question to find a clip on lens
hood for my A 24mm f2.8,
On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
Every time the photo.net ad pops up, I grumble to
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=107
--
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Ya, clicking on that little box to dismiss the ad is a real time
waister. I could probably pull up 3 or 4 pictures on Smugmug or the
Pentax Gallery in the same time. ;-)
You know, it's gotten so bad that after I click on the link to Smugmug
or the Pentax Gallery and get the delay, I just click
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
The Flicker interface has other problems for me...can never tell which
picture I'm supposed to look at.
If I send you the links
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/5865448384/lightbox/
or
Each time I see said adds, I wonder why the user would tolerate it.
I'll continue to click on the X, but I imagine it will discourage some from
using Photo.net.
Jack
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re:
Apparently it isn't universal - I don't get the pop up ad.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com
Subject: Photo.net no more
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Stan Halpin
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/
B
I am still pondering the riverside shot and the tablesstools. I am not
sure about the positioning of the foreground/midground crate by the
river, am slightly
On 27/06/2011, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
I made a decision
On 11-06-27 3:26 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Every time the
On 23/6/11, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
The A*85/1.4 is OK wide open as well.
I think that's an understatement.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
I have to say that I'm tired of the ads and the attitude. Too commercial
for me.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Photo.net members don't see the ads. I've considered changing but I have over
3000 images on photo.net, and Im paid up through 2012. Plus, I don't really
have time go fool around with something new. I really don't like the flickr
interface, but I think smugmug is nice. Maybe some day.
Paul
On
On 2011-06-27 15:26, Larry Colen wrote:
How much would people be willing to pay for a photo hosting site that didn't
suck?
I pay about US$ 10 a month for mine.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On 27/6/11, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
My wife has a flip phone and likes to cradle her phone on her shoulder
so she can do things while talking. She is getting a smartphone but
these are much less comfortable to use in this fashion. I'm thinking
of getting her a headset.
Den 27. juni 2011 kl. 21.26 skrev Larry Colen:
How much would people be willing to pay for a photo hosting site that didn't
suck?
I think I pay about $80 a year to the web hotel and made everything in
Rapidweaver (about $60 on apple app store). A nice thing is that if it sucks at
least it
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads. I've considered changing but I have over
3000 images on photo.net, and Im paid up through 2012. Plus, I don't really
have time go fool around with something new. I really don't
Not as good as the other action shots--did the pitcher just throw the ball, or
is he shielding himself from getting clobbered by a line drive?
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Scott Loveless
[...]
I may start hosting my own again, because the photo hosting sites are
like operating systems - they all suck.
Hear, hear!
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: 27 June 2011 21:38
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
Photo.net members don't see the ads. I've considered changing but I
have over 3000 images on photo.net, and Im paid
You post a photo of salt shakers and people start commenting on the Buskers.
Often the comments don't seem to follow the pictures.
And the damned interface is still slow!!!
Do they think they are tricking me with those rotating red black balls?
How about just using the old spinning hourglass.
On Jun 27, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: 27 June 2011 21:38
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
Photo.net members don't see the ads. I've considered changing but I
have
I had the same thought; it works both ways.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Not as good as the other action shots--did the pitcher just throw the ball,
or is he shielding himself from getting clobbered by a line drive?
Rick
The man amongst his wares is a fine shot.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Stan Halpin
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/
B
I am still pondering the riverside shot and the
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads.
Apparently, non-members who visit photo.net with JavaScript turned off
(use Firefox with the NoScript plug-in) don't see ads either.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads.
Apparently, non-members who visit photo.net with JavaScript turned off
(use Firefox with the NoScript plug-in) don't see ads either.
well,
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:26:20 -0400
Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Any suggestions? I'm willing to spend up to about
$125. If this is too low, I'm willing to re-evaluate.
given my experience with the technology, which may be more good luck
than management, you can likely spend
On top of which, photo.net is butt-ugly to look at these days.
I pay the $25 to flickr for ad-free photo-sharing with family
friends. For the stuff I care about, I host on my own blog. But to
make it work the way I like it, I had to write a whole bunch of
software, so I can't in good
Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads.
Apparently, non-members who visit photo.net with JavaScript turned off
(use Firefox with the NoScript plug-in) don't see ads
Hey Paul, would it cost you severe personal or business pain if
photo.net declared bankruptcy tomorrow and shut down on Thursday? If
so, you might want to have a Plan B in place, because it wouldn't
surprise me in the slightest. Yeah, I know, migrating thousands of
pix is a major pain in the
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
Of
Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads.
Apparently, non-members who visit photo.net with JavaScript turned
off
(use Firefox with the NoScript plug-in) don't see ads either.
A few of us use Zenfolio. Basic ($25/yr), Unlimited ($50/yr) and Premium
($100/yr) plans available. Customizable, park your own domain there, unlimited
traffic, unlimited storage for all plans above the Basic . . .
http://www.zenfolio.com/zf/all-features.aspx
stan
On Jun 27, 2011, at 4:54 PM,
On 28/06/11 8:16 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
Hey Paul, would it cost you severe personal or business pain if
photo.net declared bankruptcy tomorrow and shut down on Thursday? If
so, you might want to have a Plan B in place, because it wouldn't
surprise me in the slightest. Yeah, I know, migrating
I'd crop an L off the upper right side of the, er, stuff. Nice catch, though.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:15 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try that.
Dave
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Nice composition but IMO it would be a touch
From: Ken Waller
Apparently it isn't universal - I don't get the pop up ad.
I don't think I've ever seen a pop-up ad on photo.net
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1388 / Virus Database: 1513/3728 - Release Date: 06/26/11
--
PDML
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't want to
be forced to go shopping first.:
Never go to London with my daughter, then. I'm just saying . . .
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
They know you're too cheap to buy anything, John.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:27 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Ken Waller
Apparently it isn't universal - I don't get the pop up ad.
I don't think I've ever seen a pop-up ad on photo.net
-
No virus found in this
On Jun 27, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
Hey Paul, would it cost you severe personal or business pain if
photo.net declared bankruptcy tomorrow and shut down on Thursday?
That's a hoot. It isn't going to happen. I am amused by those who believe
photo.net is suffering because they get a
On Jun 27, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Bob W wrote:
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't want to
be forced to go shopping first.
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see ads on
the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the
On 2011-06-27 16:16 , Tim Bray wrote:
Hey Paul, would it cost you severe personal or business pain if
photo.net declared bankruptcy tomorrow and shut down on Thursday?
photo.net is among the oldest community websites around; i was once fond
of it and used to read Greenspun's articles and look
On 2011-06-25 10:36 , Charles Robinson wrote:
Pretty!
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2011/rainbow_bridge/index.html
at least at the size presented, you did a fine job of handholding
used to live not far from the Franklin Street bridge, just a bit
downstream, and had many long walks
On 28 June 2011 10:44, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
(snip) I like ads. No, I love ads.
Paul
I'm not against ads. They let me have a service which costs me
nothing, at the small cost of some inconspicuous advertising on the
page where my work is displayed.
But let me
On 2011-06-27 18:48 , Paul Stenquist wrote:
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see ads on
the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the interior of the bus
as well. And if they weren't there, you'd probably have to pay twice as much to
ride that
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/25/2011 06:25, Mark Cassino wrote:
Great shots - that 'aged photo' filter does a nice job, but the the
essential
composition and lighting really comes through in the photos.
I am with Mark on this one.
Dropping
G;'day all
Knowing my interest in old cameras, my brother-in-law presented me with
his old SLR. I've always wanted to play with one of these:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/_IGP0567om.jpg
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
I also like those desturated portraits (especially the first 5).
In addition to two WR lenses you need Bong WR. :-)
I was, but after all these years something is wrong with the O rings...
--
Bong Manayon
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Very fine job with the partially desaturated portraits.
The full color shots are also up to your annoyingly high standards.
Uh...thanks?
:-)
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
This is *very* droll ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v8DbLWAXvU
The subtitles are critical to your enjoyment, so nuke the ads if they
overlay them.
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
On 28 June 2011 10:44, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
(snip) I like ads. No, I love ads.
Paul
I'm not against ads. They let me have a service which costs me
nothing, at the small cost of some inconspicuous advertising
On 28 June 2011 11:35, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
G;'day all
Knowing my interest in old cameras, my brother-in-law presented me with
his old SLR. I've always wanted to play with one of these:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/_IGP0567om.jpg
Very nice, I have an old OM 10
On 28/06/11 11:36 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
This is *very* droll ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v8DbLWAXvU
The subtitles are critical to your enjoyment, so nuke the ads if they
overlay them.
-bmw
Clearly has a warped sense of humour, so I'd hire her as she would fit
right in.
--
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
Olympus always made such nice small cameras.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
G;'day all
Knowing my interest in old cameras, my brother-in-law presented me with
his old SLR. I've always wanted to play with one of these:
Philip you may want to correct your signature as you have left out the r in
dark. Instead of having it as http://aviewfinderdarkly.com.au/ you have it
as http://aviewfinderdakly.com.au/
___
You can see my latest captures by visiting my Flickr page:
It's a great idea. I definitely wouldn't want to look at 12 shots of dog poop.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz wrote:
BTW I'm sure you don't intend these to be hard rules.
I wouldn't want PDML to
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 07:20:55PM -0600, steve harley wrote:
On 2011-06-27 18:48 , Paul Stenquist wrote:
i'm very good at ignoring ads, but for many people, and especially
when pop-ups are involved, viewing an ad is fairly akin to forced
window-shopping
And forced-to-watch ads are akin to
On 28 June 2011 12:50, Sandy Harris sandyinch...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never seen an intrusive ad on that site. I just tested by
clicking on Rick's
link (Some nice photos there, by the way.) and got no ads.
I'm using Firefox on Linux with so ad-blocking and script-blocking add-ons.
I do not
Perhaps Charlotte can spell?
On 28/06/11 12:56 PM, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
Philip you may want to correct your signature as you have left out the r in
dark. Instead of having it as http://aviewfinderdarkly.com.au/ you have it
as http://aviewfinderdakly.com.au/
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: The GESO Dilemma
It's a great idea. I definitely wouldn't want to look at 12 shots of dog
poop.
I can see why, they'd all be crappy !
On
Saw this over at TOP and found it incredibly funny.
http://www.zie.nl/video/opmerkelijk/Meeuw-steelt-camera/m1ezpfqfk1dv
--
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com
Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 6/27/2011 20:09, Tim Bray wrote:
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss before I could see the
picture. This is unacceptable behavior and, sorry folks, I just ain't
clicking on any more photo.net links.
FYI, for those
On 6/27/2011 23:45, Cotty wrote:
I use a Blue Parrot B250-XT for when I'm driving - excellent quality
with a maximum volume that can easily be heard over the din of a Land
Rover doing 90.
Cotty, is it 90 imperial or 90 metric?
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 6/27/2011 16:26, Steven Desjardins wrote:
My wife has a flip phone and likes to cradle her phone on her shoulder
so she can do things while talking. She is getting a smartphone but
these are much less comfortable to use in this fashion. I'm thinking
of getting her a headset. It doesn't
On 27/06/2011 6:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No, I love ads.
To a great extent, you are an ad.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
