On Jun 9, 2014, at 3:25 pm, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> This gal knows how to work the camera:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785222&size=lg
Looks like a male to me, unless I have the wrong species
> Earlier, I posted the wrong link for what I believe is a Brown Thrasher. Same
> equip
On Jun 9, 2014, at 1:24 pm, Bill wrote:
> Giant rats with wings, the Canada Goose is a belligerent, vile tempered
> animal. Pity the poor soul who draws the ire of one of these mean spirited
> demons of the animal kingdom.
Do they at least taste good?
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I can even see an un-cracked seed in her beak! I've been trying to get some
shots like that but can't get close enough without scaring the subjects off.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 5:25 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO Poser
"Fortunately they also did clean it up before leaving"
How did you get that right?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 2:38 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO party chaos
For Z-day we pretty much kept the party downstairs and left the ki
I took a gander & can see that your 1.4xTC works very well. I did some tests
on my old 2xTC's and found that you are quite right - they are terrible,
full of CA. Won't even bother to post.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 2:18 AM
To: Pentax-D
Yes indeed. Great catch, Paul. Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 11:25 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> This gal knows how to work the camera:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785222&size=lg
>
> K3, DA* 60-250, DA 1.4X converter,
>
>
> Earlier, I posted the w
This gal knows how to work the camera:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785222&size=lg
K3, DA* 60-250, DA 1.4X converter,
Earlier, I posted the wrong link for what I believe is a Brown Thrasher. Same
equipment as above, but a very deep crop on this:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?phot
Quoting Christine Aguila :
Excellent, Brian! Cheers, Christine
Thanks for looking, Christine. Much appreciated.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 8, 2014, at 7:49 AM,
Quoting Ann Sanfedele :
pretty - I see you also have the right speed (like Mark) for making
creamy waterfalls..which really does seem to make them look the most
appealing... IF that's handheld I'll have to hate you :-)
No - you can save that hate for another day :-)>
The interesting thing
Again, appreciated remarks, Christine.
Thanks!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 7:55:02 PM
Subject: Re: Peso: Found Bottles
The detail and color is very striking. The tight crop doesn't bother me.
Cheers, Christine
Sent from m
I see some odd shades which I tend to attribute to the very small drugstore
scan. It's really not one
that I'm driven to have rescanned.
Thanks for commenting, Christine.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 7:49:45 PM
Subject: Re: Pes
Thanks, Christine. My feeling about the crop is essentially the same as yours.
I, also, always re confirm my feeling that the bull belongs in the middle.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 7:43:18 PM
Subject: Re: Peso: Lonely Bull
The detail and color is very striking. The tight crop doesn't bother me.
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 9:41 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
>
> Some years back, while driving a local back road, I noticed a couple guys, on
> a pull-off, standing by a stump covered with
I agree with Bob's comments. Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
> I like the lighting in that but I think there's too much of the greenery and
> it would have benefitted from concentrating on the blooms.
>
> It is a bit like a shot I took a
Almost looks like a painted photo. Interesting. Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> I've been to the Grand Canyon with a camera, but this attachment doesn't
> exactly fit my recollections.
> Low res drug store scan done years ago.
> Am f
Very nice, Bruce! The women are really cute! Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> These are all from a creative studio shoot I was invited to by Layla
> Azer, the designer of the newspaper dresses. I was the only one
> shooting with lights
Congrats! Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 10:56 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
> We knew 2 weeks ago but they wanted to keep it hush hush till week 12,
> and made the announcement to their friends and other family members at
> her birthday bash last night.
>
> We had to
Hi Jack: I like it. At first I thought a small crop on the left and at the top
might work, but I decided against it. The bull looks less lonely when you do
that. :-)
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:38 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
>
> I beg your indulgence for just
OH, I see. Thanks, ann.
I especially like this mood. It was shot through the car windshield, but the
result never did
bother me due to the early evening light. The bull's silhouette has always
pleased me.
It's a large file done on a serious scanner.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Ann
Excellent, Brian! Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> G'day all
>
> Another one from my road trip around southern Victoria.
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP5385-K5-1peso.html
>
> http://tinyurl.com/qjte
Very nice, Paul! Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 8:37 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 8, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Oh good: I hope they like it so much that they stay. ;-)
>>
>> Nicely composed, Paul. It could use a midtone contrast boost
The second rendering is very nice. Very nice composition, and I like the
"bokeh-dots" in the background.
Rick
On Jun 8, 2014, at 8:37 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> Oh good: I hope they like it so much that they stay. ;-)
>>
>> Nicely comp
On Jun 8, 2014, at 20:08 , Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 05:06 , Eric Weir wrote:
>
>>
>> Recently I took a bunch of photos in low-light with my K5 set to ISO 12800.
>> The lens was an A 28/2.8, which I get good results with with good light.
>> After doing noise reduction on t
On 08/06/2014 7:30 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jun 8, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Bill
wrote:
On 08/06/2014 6:18 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785053&size=lg
K-3 with DA*60-250 and DA 1.4X converter. f5.6 @ 1/640th, ISO
800, 350mm
They are invading, not vacat
On Jun 8, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 08/06/2014 6:18 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785053&size=lg
>>
>> K-3 with DA*60-250 and DA 1.4X converter. f5.6 @ 1/640th, ISO 800, 350mm
>>
>
> They are invading, not vacationing.
> Be afraid.
>
> Throug
On 08/06/2014 6:43 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
that's very nice - and I rather like Canadians in general
We like you fine.
(Remember I'm a Scot at heart when you read this).
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from t
On 08/06/2014 6:18 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785053&size=lg
K-3 with DA*60-250 and DA 1.4X converter. f5.6 @ 1/640th, ISO 800, 350mm
They are invading, not vacationing.
Be afraid.
Through an accident of nature, the Canada Goose is not a native specie
On Jun 8, 2014, at 05:06 , Eric Weir wrote:
>
> Recently I took a bunch of photos in low-light with my K5 set to ISO 12800.
> The lens was an A 28/2.8, which I get good results with with good light.
> After doing noise reduction on them the images looked pretty smudgy. Almost,
> but not quite
pretty - I see you also have the right speed (like Mark) for making
creamy waterfalls..which really does seem to make them look the most
appealing... IF that's handheld I'll have to hate you :-)
ann
On 6/8/2014 20:33, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Jack Davis :
Nicely rendered, Brian. Intrigu
I like that rendering better, Paul. Nice!
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> Oh good: I hope they like it so much that they stay. ;-)
>>
>> Nicely composed, Paul. It could use a midtone contrast boost.
>
> Yep. Too subtl
Ooops - I get the Canadians again with this link
defininitely not brown thrasher :-)
ann
On 6/8/2014 20:22, Paul Stenquist wrote:
At least I think it’s a brown thrasher.
In the wetlands near the Rouge River:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785053&size=lg
K-3 with DA* 60-259 and DA 1.
that's very nice - and I rather like Canadians in general
ann
On 6/8/2014 20:18, Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785053&size=lg
K-3 with DA*60-250 and DA 1.4X converter. f5.6 @ 1/640th, ISO 800, 350mm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml
For Z-day we pretty much kept the party downstairs and left the kids to
the upstairs living room. They did a pretty good job of generating chaos.
Fortunately they also did clean it up before leaving:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/14191194779
And it was done by five kids, one of whom spe
On Jun 8, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Oh good: I hope they like it so much that they stay. ;-)
>
> Nicely composed, Paul. It could use a midtone contrast boost.
Yep. Too subtle. Here’s another render:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785195&size=lg
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2
Quoting Jack Davis :
Nicely rendered, Brian. Intrigue is often a big part of image success.
Makes me want to see more of what's above the falls.
Thanks, Jack (and Attila). Comments much appreciated.
Actually there's not much to see above the falls, just a not very
aesthetic farmhouse and
Quoting Bruce Walker :
Attila, I wanted Brian's PUG to get the scoop. Now I can post the rest
of that gallery. :-)
But it's not my PUG - it's your PUG (as in the PDML's PUG)...
:-)>
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ry
Oh good: I hope they like it so much that they stay. ;-)
Nicely composed, Paul. It could use a midtone contrast boost.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785053&size=lg
>
> K-3 with DA*60-250 and DA 1.4X converter. f5.6 @ 1/640th, I
At least I think it’s a brown thrasher.
In the wetlands near the Rouge River:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785053&size=lg
K-3 with DA* 60-259 and DA 1.4 X, f5.6 @ 1/640, ISO 800, 350mm. Cropped
severely. This is about 30% of frame.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
htt
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17785053&size=lg
K-3 with DA*60-250 and DA 1.4X converter. f5.6 @ 1/640th, ISO 800, 350mm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and f
lol!
what I'm serious about is that you just didn't get a good scan of it and
the snapshot and clearly deteriorated over the years.. I like the photo
- that is, I like what you wanted the photo to be and it might have been
back then - so I just thought it was worth putting some effort into...
I see the smiley, but I need to know if you're serious.
Does this remind you of such a conversation we had awhile back?
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 4:51:03 PM
Subject: Re: Peso: Lonely Bull
"It looks crappy now but you can fix i
"It looks crappy now but you can fix it in photo shop"
:-)
On 6/8/2014 18:34, Jack Davis wrote:
"Explain" as Spock would ask.
Sure you're not referencing another image? Hmmm,
..."technical limits of flatbeds and snapshots?"
Jack ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
To: "PDM
Folks have to work really hard to come up with a new gimmick to
attract attention. :-)
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
> ... literally...
> http://news.distractify.com/culture/bali-models/
>
>
> Igor
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net
I can understand the immediate thought connection, Bob.
No, it's the Sutter Buttes. ;-)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W-PDML"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 3:23:14 PM
Subject: Re: Peso: Lonely Bull
When I were a lad we lived in Gibraltar and when the Spanish border was o
On Jun 8, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Two recommendations: drop your shutter speed and don't go above 40 in
> NR Luminance.
>
> With that wide a lens you should be able to handhold at 1/60th or
> 1/100th anyway. That will buy you back a stop of lower ISO.
>
> NR Luminance 100 is a
"Explain" as Spock would ask.
Sure you're not referencing another image? Hmmm,
..."technical limits of flatbeds and snapshots?"
Jack ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 2:57:33 PM
Subject: Re: Peso: Lonely Bull
I think that one is wort
When I were a lad we lived in Gibraltar and when the Spanish border was open
we'd drive around Andalucia - very primitive still, under Franco - think W E
Smith's Spanish Village essay (although that's not Andalucia).
One of my prominent memories from that time is this sherry advert everywhere
s
I think that one is worth working on... nice geometry and mood
Understand the technical limits of flatbeds and snapshots
ann
On 6/8/2014 17:38, Jack Davis wrote:
I beg your indulgence for just one more.(?)
Don't believe I've posted this at all, if so, certainly not for some time.
Shot this t
A bit too literally. I like the second one, but would prefer a
different edit. A girl walking on a shipwreck underwater is surreal
enough without that glossy illustration effect.
By the way this is taking "trash the dress" to a whole new level:)
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Igor Roshchin wro
I beg your indulgence for just one more.(?)
Don't believe I've posted this at all, if so, certainly not for some time.
Shot this through my windshield. Will perhaps explain later.(?)
Comments welcome!
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=776
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L
I'm not sure the result justifies the effort and expense.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
> ... literally...
> http://news.distractify.com/culture/bali-models/
>
>
> Igor
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
... literally...
http://news.distractify.com/culture/bali-models/
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Two recommendations: drop your shutter speed and don't go above 40 in
NR Luminance.
With that wide a lens you should be able to handhold at 1/60th or
1/100th anyway. That will buy you back a stop of lower ISO.
NR Luminance 100 is a guaranteed watercolor effect. Keep the Detail
sliders at 50 too.
Cheers Grandpa!
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:56 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> We knew 2 weeks ago but they wanted to keep it hush hush till week 12,
> and made the announcement to their friends and other family members at
> her birthday bash last night.
>
> We had to pretend to be surprised,:-)
>
> htt
I can report that all-newspaper dresses aren't practical either. The
designer was running around constantly with a roll of tape to repair
spontaneous wardrobe malfunctions that kept occurring.
Thank you Attila; my faves are the low-key ones too. I'm exploring
that mode more. Models reported that t
I'm considering a full res scan if I can come up with the negative.
May look more current if I do. ;-)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W-PDML"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 12:10:36 PM
Subject: Re: Peso: Mystery Canyon
That looks like something from a 1960s National Geogra
Thanks Bob.
Indeed the blooms were the best part.
I, somehow, failed to focus on them (even while cropping)
because the lack of a solid base made a nice composition practically impossible.
Will try again.
I liked your picture, by the way.
Bulent
--
That looks like something from a 1960s National Geographic.
B
> On 8 Jun 2014, at 16:11, "Jack Davis" wrote:
>
>
> I've been to the Grand Canyon with a camera, but this attachment doesn't
> exactly fit my recollections.
> Low res drug store scan done years ago.
> Am finished mining my files f
I like the lighting in that but I think there's too much of the greenery and it
would have benefitted from concentrating on the blooms.
It is a bit like a shot I took a few weeks ago, through someone's window. Same
kind of deep shadow behind which really brings the colours forward:
http://www.w
Congratulations!
> On 8 Jun 2014, at 15:57, "David J Brooks" wrote:
>
> We knew 2 weeks ago but they wanted to keep it hush hush till week 12,
> and made the announcement to their friends and other family members at
> her birthday bash last night.
>
> We had to pretend to be surprised,:-)
>
>
Congratulations to Erin and Michael(?) and of course the grandpsrents!
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 9:56 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> We knew 2 weeks ago but they wanted to keep it hush hush till week 12,
> and made the announcement to their friends and other family members at
> her bi
We've gone through the first month of availability and sales have
slowed down to a trickle, so I'm assuming everyone who wanted one of
the hardcover books with the deluxe paper has already purchased one.
That being the case, I've changed the settings for the hardcover (both
imagewrap and dust jacke
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 2:47 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>> Eric, a few questions:
>> - what was your shutter speed?
>> - were you shooting handheld?
>> - what aperture? Wide open?
>> - what Lightroom NR settings did you u
On Jun 8, 2014, at 12:15 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> Pentax's standard focusing screens are pretty poor for manual focusing in low
> light. An interesting design decision, when you consider that low light
> focusing is where auto focus tends to break down. The K-5II is really good
> at low lig
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Eric, a few questions:
> - what was your shutter speed?
> - were you shooting handheld?
> - what aperture? Wide open?
> - what Lightroom NR settings did you use?
What is the air speed of an African swallow
Dave
>
> Aside from the other consi
On Jun 8, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Eric, a few questions:
> - what was your shutter speed?
> - were you shooting handheld?
> - what aperture? Wide open?
> - what Lightroom NR settings did you use?
Thanks, Bruce. Shutter speed was 1/180, not quite wide open (4.0), and yes I
was
On Jun 8, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Bill wrote:
> The gang on the Fuji forums seems to complain about this a lot. The
> watercolor effect seems to be part of an overly aggressive noise reduction
> process that smears the image. My understanding is that Noise Ninja is better
> for removing high ISO n
Again, a lightly tone monochrome (imitating palladium toning).
http://celasun.wordpress.com/2014/06/08/kalanchoe/
The words below the image mean something like below:
"It is said that the unhappiness of the men started
when he named things.
Kalanchoe knows this.
We do not."
Comments are kindly i
So the cat is out of the paper bag:)
Nice gallery, looks like the girls had great fun together. I very much
like the low light portraits (like your PUG entry). I remember coats
mimicking newspaper were fashionable in the past, but of course those
weren't made from real newspaper.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2
On Jun 7, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Stanley Halpin wrote:
> This is one of those very very rare occasions when I wish I were on the left
> coast. Have a great party, and best wishes to the aging Zeb. Milestones like
> this deserve to be celebrated! (Spoken from the perspective of one who will
> hit 7
These are all from a creative studio shoot I was invited to by Layla
Azer, the designer of the newspaper dresses. I was the only one
shooting with lights and I managed to produce two completely different
moods with the models.
http://off-axis.brucemwalker.com/post/87702525657/newspaper-dresses-des
Attila, I wanted Brian's PUG to get the scoop. Now I can post the rest
of that gallery. :-)
And thank you.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Attila Boros wrote:
> What Happened to the Crossword Section? by Bruce Walker, nice pose and
> very good lighting, funny title. I saw some photos from this s
Thank you, Brian. I seem to be on a roll with you. :-)
Great gallery, and Dario's "Italy to Japan and Back" is right at the
top. Perfect marriage of art and technique. I also much admire Harvey
Reading's Cold and Ken Waller's "On the Web".
Thanks, Brian, for publishing this.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014
Eric, a few questions:
- what was your shutter speed?
- were you shooting handheld?
- what aperture? Wide open?
- what Lightroom NR settings did you use?
Aside from the other considerations, I have found that backing way off
on the NR is very helpful. You just _have_ to accept some noise, and
the
Thanks Ann,
>Thanks Bob and Brian - someone on the list joked about doing this - and I
>happened to have mine pretty handy since it is in SIGN LANGUAGE... so I'm
>really not as clever as you think :-)
Thought I had seen it before :)
But fits the theme perfectly
>These two really jumped out at
Pentax's standard focusing screens are pretty poor for manual focusing
in low light. An interesting design decision, when you consider that
low light focusing is where auto focus tends to break down. The K-5II
is really good at low light auto focus, but the original K-5 not so
much. I'd look
I like the placement of the tree on the right and the river flowing
through the frame. It has a painterly feel and a lot of potential to
be developed into a great photo. You can mine for negatives next
time:)
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> I've been to the Grand Canyon with
I believe they themselves were about the same hygienically.
Thanks for commenting, Attila!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Attila Boros"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 8:05:56 AM
Subject: Re: Peso: Found Bottles
Nice rendering with lots of detail and vivid colors. Those guys m
I've been to the Grand Canyon with a camera, but this attachment doesn't
exactly fit my recollections.
Low res drug store scan done years ago.
Am finished mining my files for today.
"God light" somewhat a mystery. Suspect can't be defined against the sky.
Comments?
Jack
http://photolightimage
Nice rendering with lots of detail and vivid colors. Those guys might
want to complement their bottle collection with a bottle brush
collection
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Some years back, while driving a local back road, I noticed a couple guys, on
> a pull-off, sta
We knew 2 weeks ago but they wanted to keep it hush hush till week 12,
and made the announcement to their friends and other family members at
her birthday bash last night.
We had to pretend to be surprised,:-)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/14373350624/
Our daughter Erin is going to be a
On 08/06/2014 4:06 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
Recently I took a bunch of photos in low-light with my K5 set to ISO
12800. The lens was an A 28/2.8, which I get good results with with
good light. After doing noise reduction on them the images looked
pretty smudgy. Almost, but not quite, like water colo
Very nice!
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> G'day all
>
> Another one from my road trip around southern Victoria.
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP5385-K5-1peso.html
>
> http://tinyurl.com/qjtejv8
>
> Pentax K-5 with DA 18-135 mm.
>
> Comments
On Jun 8, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Richard Womer wrote:
> Eric, how are you shooting and processing? Using RAW and the sharpening and
> noise tools in LR4, I get very clear images at 6400, and pretty clear at
> 12800, though detail declines as speed increases. The sharpening and noise
> tools take
On Jun 8, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Bob W wrote:
> You would have half a stop more light entering the viewfinder, which isn't
> much, for manual focusing. However, I guess the DA lens is autofocus, so you
> might want to delegate that to the chain gang of enslaved pixies operating
> the focusing mechani
Some years back, while driving a local back road, I noticed a couple guys, on a
pull-off, standing by a stump covered with bottles.
I stopped and, after a short look, asked if I be allowed to photograph their
bottle collection.
They agreed, and I, probably too quickly, took a couple shots, hand
What Happened to the Crossword Section? by Bruce Walker, nice pose and
very good lighting, funny title. I saw some photos from this shoot on
FB, was wondering when will you post them here;)
Last Ferry Home by Pat Temmerman, nice tones, good composition, the
feeling of open space comes through well
Eric, how are you shooting and processing? Using RAW and the sharpening and
noise tools in LR4, I get very clear images at 6400, and pretty clear at 12800,
though detail declines as speed increases. The sharpening and noise tools take
some reading and practice, but work well.
If you're shooti
Nicely rendered, Brian. Intrigue is often a big part of image success.
Makes me want to see more of what's above the falls.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Walters"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 4:49:59 AM
Subject: PESO - Hopkins Falls
G'day all
Another one from my ro
G'day all
Another one from my road trip around southern Victoria.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP5385-K5-1peso.html
http://tinyurl.com/qjtejv8
Pentax K-5 with DA 18-135 mm.
Comments etc, appreciated:
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Wal
You would have half a stop more light entering the viewfinder, which isn't
much, for manual focusing. However, I guess the DA lens is autofocus, so you
might want to delegate that to the chain gang of enslaved pixies operating
the focusing mechanism in the engine room.
B
> -Original Message--
Recently I took a bunch of photos in low-light with my K5 set to ISO 12800. The
lens was an A 28/2.8, which I get good results with with good light. After
doing noise reduction on them the images looked pretty smudgy. Almost, but not
quite, like water color images.
I’m blaming the result on p
92 matches
Mail list logo
