Try this...
http://members.iinet.net.au/~jcoyle/USA/New%20York/album/
On 12/29/2016 12:07 AM, Philip Northeast wrote:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~jcoyle/USA/New York/album/
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The URL did not work for me
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 29/12/16 2:36 pm, John Coyle wrote:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~jcoyle/USA/New York/album/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
To stop Ann toe-tapping, here's the set from NY!
http://members.iinet.net.au/~jcoyle/USA/New York/album/
Comments etc., all welcome.
John in Brisbane
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> On Dec 28, 2016, at 8:51 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
> wrote:
>
> How many of these were made?
Not enough.
>
> Is there any relationship between the serial numbers and the dates?
>
> —
Probably not. They probably did some ouija board consultation, came up with a
Aha!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Ralf R Radermacher
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 10:41 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Frosty French Flanders
A few impressions from the river Aa in Northern France, this morning. -3
°C and freezing fog:
They listen to it on the radio
On December 28, 2016 6:35:58 PM PST, Bill wrote:
>On 12/28/2016 8:27 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>> Bill Spoke Thusly
>>
>>> On 12/28/2016 7:51 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>>
How many of these were made?
>>
>>
Is
On 12/28/2016 8:27 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Bill Spoke Thusly
On 12/28/2016 7:51 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
How many of these were made?
Is there any relationship between the serial numbers and the dates?
42, and no.
Did you just watch Hitchhiker?
Nobody
Bill Spoke Thusly
>On 12/28/2016 7:51 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>> How many of these were made?
>>
>> Is there any relationship between the serial numbers and the dates?
>>
>
>42, and no.
>
Did you just watch Hitchhiker?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 12/21/2016 9:03 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> It's coffee o'clock ...
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
>>
>> 90% SFW. There's a sliver of nipple, but it's in b so that makes it
Agreed, Bob. One or two of those tasks would get fumbled. :)
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> Reading, drinking coffee and waiting for her laundry to dry, all at the same
> time? More than any man could achieve...
>
> B
>
>> On 21 Dec 2016, at 16:07,
Appreciated, Ken!
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Great subject/pose, very nice lighting... What's not to like?
>
>
> -Original Message-
>>From: Bruce Walker
>>Subject: PESO - Multitasking
>>
>>It's coffee o'clock ...
>>
Down, boy! :)
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> I think I could help her multitask more. ;)
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>> It's coffee o'clock ...
>>
>>
Should she be doing something with her feet too? Maybe you just take
reading and drinking a hot beverage at the same time for granted. :)
Thanks, Ann!
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Nice shot, but don't think it is multitasking
>
> ann
>
>
> On
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 21/12/16, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>It's coffee o'clock ...
>>
>>https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
>>
>>90% SFW. There's a sliver of nipple, but it's in b so that
On 12/28/2016 11:28 AM, John Francis wrote:
I think you have that backwards.
With an electronic shutter, the image is taken at electronic speeds; the
entire sensor is cleared, then the image is captured. There's no reason
for the electronics to expose different pixels at different times.
On 12/28/2016 7:51 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
How many of these were made?
Is there any relationship between the serial numbers and the dates?
42, and no.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
How many of these were made?
Is there any relationship between the serial numbers and the dates?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
a nice series
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 29/12/16 8:02 am, Larry Colen wrote:
Someone recently posted a photo of the local covered bridge lit by
holiday lighting. I thought that my own take on that would be a good
excuse to play with the 15-30. I had barely set things
I sure do. Now that I'm back on Facebook I feel I'm walking on
eggshells every time I post something. Their attitude to the
definition of art and what is acceptable to them is inscrutable.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 4:59 PM, John wrote:
> Sometimes you have to wonder who
Thank you, Dave!
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 4:31 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> nice lighting and pose
>
> Dave
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>> Inspired by Marc LaGrange, and maybe a bit cheesy, but what the heck.
>>
>> This
Thanks, Larry.
This shot was part of an experiment for me in trying to frame more
loosely and include more ambient detail. Trouble for me here is that
the ambient contains little interesting detail. The stone/brick walls
are bare, and the floor is nice but featureless. So I ended up
cropping into
and I do enjoy - especially the middle one.. the road next to the
canal. The last one is a sad sight.. I'm a bit bothered by there not
being any space above the
structural frame of the buildingin the last one..
ann
On 12/28/2016 3:41 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
A few impressions from
Sometimes you have to wonder who are the real "boobs" though!
On 12/28/2016 4:01 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Inspired by Marc LaGrange, and maybe a bit cheesy, but what the heck.
This one's in colour, and is solidly NSFW because boobs.
nice lighting and pose
Dave
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Inspired by Marc LaGrange, and maybe a bit cheesy, but what the heck.
>
> This one's in colour, and is solidly NSFW because boobs.
>
>
I love the lighting, and the subject is gorgeous. Having her so
centered in the frame doesn't feel right to me. At the very least I'd
crop the right and bottom tighter so she is looking more into rather
than out of the frame. Alternatively, I'd try cropping tight to the
dress and over her
Lovely, moody feel to these, Ralf. I especially like the first two,
with the river.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
> A few impressions from the river Aa in Northern France, this morning. -3 °C
> and freezing fog:
>
>
That looks really cold. Nice work. You even do good work in the daylight.
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
A few impressions from the river Aa in Northern France, this morning. -3
°C and freezing fog:
http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.fr/2016/12/frostige-grue-von-der-aa.html
Enjoy.
Ralf
--
Someone recently posted a photo of the local covered bridge lit by
holiday lighting. I thought that my own take on that would be a good
excuse to play with the 15-30. I had barely set things up and taken a
couple of test shots last night when all of the lights were turned off.
I may go back
Inspired by Marc LaGrange, and maybe a bit cheesy, but what the heck.
This one's in colour, and is solidly NSFW because boobs.
http://portfolio.brucemwalker.com/index/GgHoq5gQcQhY/IVODDPeI99fo
645z, dfa645 55mm/2.8, f/4, 1/15th sec, 800 ISO; handheld.
5' gridded stripbox, camera right.
A few impressions from the river Aa in Northern France, this morning. -3
°C and freezing fog:
http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.fr/2016/12/frostige-grue-von-der-aa.html
Enjoy.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Dunkerque/Dunkirk, France
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio :
I think you have that backwards.
With an electronic shutter, the image is taken at electronic speeds; the
entire sensor is cleared, then the image is captured. There's no reason
for the electronics to expose different pixels at different times. While
there will certainly be some delay across
You don't see the rolling effect because it is only a half electronic
shutter. When the shutter closes or stops as an electronic aperture
does is when you get the motion artifacts. That's when the sensor
starts reading out. With a mechanical shutter it just closes and
starts reading off the
I was playing with some night landscape work tonight, using live view,
and when I took a photo, I didn't hear the shutter. I realized that was
because I had set my camera to use electronic shutter in live view
because that means it doesn't need to go flop flop with the shutter and
you don't
33 matches
Mail list logo