Stan Halpin wrote:
Thanks Mark. Given that Derby and you had produced two possible
solutions, I just did a Google to see if there might be others out
there.
...
2. http://www.prairie.mb.ca/product/pg-photolink.php
...
3. http://oregonstate.edu/~earlyj/gpsphotolinker/
...
Now I just
Charles Robinson wrote:
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/images/imgp5058b.jpg
Did anyone else manage to finally see this elusive thing?
Good effort Charles!
Much better than my attempt - got a brief look at the comet on the 11th,
but the weather here in NE England was not too clement.
J and K Messervy wrote:
I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit
indoors and out.
First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a
little disappointing. I'm finding that for a shot indoors of my kids or
similar at quite close range,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Dixon
Subject: Re: A problem of reassembly
Place the filter up to your eye, and look at yourself in a mirror.
If the camera-side is nearest you, you will be able to see the reflection
of your eye.
If the camera
John Francis wrote:
I was out shooting yesterday, and my polarizing filter
fell off the front of the lens and onto the path.
Fortunately the glass didn't break, but it did pop out
of the filter holder, leaving me with three pieces to
reassemble - holder, glass and retaining clip.
My problem is
A few weeks ago I mentioned that my the built-in flash on my *istD had
failed 18 months after purchase (and outside the 1 year guarantee).
Well, I wrote a polite letter to the retailer's head office (Jacobs - a
smallish chain of UK photo shops) asking them to repair it since the
problem was
released for sale) and had it
repaired under warranty.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
David Dixon wrote:
Reading about Don's problems with his *istD and built-in flash has
prompted me to write.
My *istD developed a similar problem while using the built-in flash
Reading about Don's problems with his *istD and built-in flash has
prompted me to write.
My *istD developed a similar problem while using the built-in flash - no
charging, coupled with apparent draining of the batteries and refusal to
trip the shutter. The flash charging circuitry is obviously
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:10:36 +0100, David Dixon wrote:
can't check if this actually works at the moment, but I think
you can do this on certain AF bodies [...]
I don't know about any others, but it works just fine on my ZX-5 and
MZ-S.
You need a custom electronic
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I know it works with manual-focus lenses just fine.
But to use the feature with AF lenses, what's needed?
Cover the AF data pin on the mount?
Disallow engaging the AF mechanical connection?
Anything else?
Collin,
I can't check if this actually works at the
Don Williams wrote:
I had hoped to hear from anyone in the group who has an *ist D
attached to a compound microscope. I'd like to know if the shutter
vibration is a serious drawback. I know the mirror can be fired in
advance to help reduce this problem. But with a selection of other
Pentax
Frantisek wrote:
DD of priority or for deletion during a slideshow. My only niggles at the
DD moment are that there's no direct access to curves (although the
DD highlight/shadow contrast sliders and appearance selector appear to
DD apply pre-set curves), and that the converted images look
Dario Bonazza wrote:
I wrote:
Except that even with shadow contrast at it lowest, the shadows can
still be pure black!
And I even tried setting exposure compensation (up to +3!), but black
areas still remain deep blacks, while both the straight in-camera jpeg
and the file converted using
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Can anyone recommend an affordable flexible flash bracket that will
flex forward for macro shots? I don't want to spend $160 for the one
that Wimberly offers.
Any advice on this, or other solutions, appreciated.
Joe
My solution was a cheap medium-format flash grip from
mike wilson wrote:
It's been cloud as anything here (NE England) for the last three days,
so no joy. Looking good for tonight, so, for sure, there will be
nothing.
mike
I hate to say this Mike, but in Durham (about 15 miles away from you?)
we've had two fantastic nights of aurora - Wednesday
!
Hopefully they'll come out better than my '99 attempts, when all my
pics of totality were hugely underexposed ...
David Dixon
Alin Flaider wrote:
This is particularly addressed to our friends in the northern Europe
who were in the position to see and photograph this annular sun
eclipse
-weighted
So, all our (P)Z-1s work the same, but are probably set up differently?
David Dixon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
To clarify, you tried the experiment below. You mounted a K or M lens
and checked metering without and with Spot? You got significantly different
reading using Spot? Can
at maximum - a T2 mount or M42-to-PK mount both move the aperture
coupler and ensure this is the case.
David Dixon
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http
modest distances - at 4m, the view is
~20% wider than the Pentax.
Hope this helps,
David Dixon
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
David Dixon
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Not Saturn, but Jupiter, with at least 3 of its 4 bright moons visible,
in a line to the lower left (towards the moon when you saw it).
A few hours earlier (6pm UK time) the moon actually passed in front of
Jupiter (for those in the N of UK) - an amazing site, and for once it
wasn't cloudy
I've had this problem with an Epson 1200 photo when scanning negatives.
The transparency unit has a narrow window above the main scanning area
which is kept clear and used to calibrate the CCD before scanning to
minimise any banding. If a piece of dust or hair got in here, I ended
up with a
Gianfranco,
Many thanks for your comments:
Durham Cathedral
by David Dixon, UK
As you state, this shot may be better classified as a landscape, or, maybe, as
'architecture in landscape'.
The strenght of the shot is in its colors: I think the autumn trees become
very well the buildings
Many thanks Jostein for commenting on my submission, and thank you also to those
who have taken the time to pass comment.
Had this been mine, I would have cropped away the foreground that is visibly
out of focus. Probably up to the small area on the left edge with no
duckweed.
I've tried out
24 matches
Mail list logo
