Services
Lawrence Way, Karratha,
Western Australia, 6714
Mob: 0414-967 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-
From: Bucky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 13 March 2004 2:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
It appears that you guys are correct. There does seem to be 3-4 pixels that are
visibly 'buggered'. I have contacted the vendor, but
I don't hold much hope for a fix. I bought this camera in the USA, and I am in
Australia. Warranties aren't usually
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
It would appear that the 'hot' pixels were noise, and as such the
*ist D's noise reduction function should take care of most of the
'hot' pixels.
The istD noise reduction isn't used for shutter speeds shorter
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Bucky and Gonz,
The pixels turned out to be 'hot' rather than 'dead'. I ran a test
through a little program called 'Dead Pixel Test' (freely available
on the web). An image is taken with lens and viewfinder caps on and
then run through the
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 13 March 2004 9:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist D Photos
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
It would appear that the 'hot' pixels were noise
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 13 March 2004 10:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Bucky and Gonz,
The pixels turned out to be 'hot' rather than 'dead'. I ran a test
through a little program called 'Dead Pixel Test
: *ist D Photos
Cool photos, especially the dragonflies in flight.
I was wondering how the *ist-D would do with bugs - looks great! (Mine
arrived with the first snow, so no chance to test it on insects yet).
- MCC
At 12:41 PM 3/13/2004 +0800, you wrote:
Hi gang,
Here are the results of my
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
Thanks Mark. I would have liked the 'in flight' shot to be a bit
sharper, but you know how fast these little buggers move. It was
more luck than good management. I'm pretty happy with the overall
performance
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist D Photos
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
Thanks Mark. I would have liked the 'in flight' shot to be a bit
sharper, but you know how fast these little buggers move. It was
more luck than good management. I'm pretty
Shaun,
Hate to point out problems, but you seem to have a bad sensor. I
noticed several shots that consistently showed stuck/hot pixels,
especially the dragon fly stills. There are at least three distinct
bright dots on those pictures, which may be each composed of one or more
stuck/hot
I'm sorry, in my haste to warn you about the stuck pixels, I forgot to
say that the pics are really nice. I especially like the shot of the
tandem-flys, how did you manage to get that shot!!!
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
Here are the results of my first foray into the bush with an
Shaun,
Hate to point out problems, but you seem to have a bad sensor. I
noticed several shots that consistently showed stuck/hot pixels,
especially the dragon fly stills. There are at least three distinct
bright dots on those pictures, which may be each composed of one or more
stuck/hot
I'm sorry, in my haste to warn you about the stuck pixels, I forgot to
say that the pics are really nice. I especially like the shot of the
tandem-flys, how did you manage to get that shot!!!
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
Here are the results of my first foray into the bush with an
]
www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 13 March 2004 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist D Photos
I'm sorry, in my haste to warn you about the stuck pixels, I forgot to
say that the pics are really nice. I
-
From: Dr. Shaun Canning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12-Mar-04 22:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
Hi Gonz,
The tandem dragon fly's was a snap shot as they flew past me
about 6 feet away. Amazingly, the FA 100mm macro fastened onto them
quick enough to get that shot
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
No, he's right. There are at least three buggered pixels that show up in
the same place in the frame regardless of orientation. You should check it
out.
--
Ask not at whom the Chimp smirks - he smirks at you.
www.smirkingchimp.com
www.gregpalast.com
: 0414-967 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-
From: Bucky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 13 March 2004 2:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
No, he's right. There are at least three buggered pixels that show up in
the same
They're so expensive that only a limited number
of photographers can
afford them ;-)
...or so good that only a limited number of
photographers notice
the
difference?
DagT (not owning one, just wanting one)
Same boat as you are: not owning one, just wanting
one. For my bank account's
Mark wrote:
Ooh, I just thought of one!
I want that sloping top panel that the MZ-S has! (Yeah, I was using a
tripod all the time and trying to read the LCD and controls on the top
of the camera.)
REPLY:
This is typically one of those features few think a lot about until one actually start
Cameron wrote:
That 31mm limited shot is just friggin amazing!
REPLY:
The 31 Limited is a friggin amazing lens. Like all the Limiteds :o)
Pål
Anders Hultman wrote:
One thing I've wondered for some time now, what does
Limited mean
here? In what way are these lenses limited?
It means that they have Limited Appeal.
(They certainly don't appeal to me!)
;-)
John
Anders wrote:
One thing I've wondered for some time now, what does Limited mean
here? In what way are these lenses limited?
It is just a name to signalise something exclusive. Some have speculated that Pentax
originally choose this name to have a way out in case it flopped...They could then
whickersworld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anders Hultman wrote:
One thing I've wondered for some time now, what does
Limited mean here? In what way are these lenses limited?
It means that they have Limited Appeal.
(They certainly don't appeal to me!)
Don't shoot any film with one. That'll
At 11:15 AM 8/18/2003 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Just uploaded 6 shots taken with the *ist-D this past weekend at
Grandfather Mountain.
Thanks for the samples and the hands on reviews - and thanks to Steve,
Graywolf, and everyone else. Looks a the *ist-D is gonna be a real winner!
- MCC
- - -
is slightly
greater than slide film.
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 12:51 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:15:47 -0400
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *ist-D photos
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I've moved the sample photos:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp.htm
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Digital camera sensors are very unforgiving of blown highlights, they are
however most forgiving of underexposure. My suspicion after looking at the
pictures is there was possibly more latitude available to you. It is
amazing what shadow detail can be retrieved from what appears to be a
blocked
Mark,
The images are great. I talked to Don, and he, in his gentle and persuasive
manner, he made me feel really bad for not having been on the Mountain. I
have been reading what I can find about the *istD and believe that Pentax
has an excellent product that they intend to aggressively compete
Just uploaded 6 shots taken with the *ist-D this past weekend at
Grandfather Mountain. They're medium resolution JPEGs of moderate
physical size (horizontally-oriented shots are only 1000 pixels wide).
No, I'm not going to upload the full 2000 x 3000 pixel images to my web
site or email them out.
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't think of any complaints other than the metering with K lenses.
Ooh, I just thought of one!
I want that sloping top panel that the MZ-S has! (Yeah, I was using a
tripod all the time and trying to read the LCD and controls on the top
of the camera.)
--
Followup:
I just did a 150% size increase on a 6 megapixel *ist-D image using
Genuine Fractals and it looks friggin' amazing! Apparently GF works much
better when has a grain-free, low-noise image to work with. At least
that's my guess. The results look *very* impressive.
Now I have to order a
: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist-D photos
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Followup:
I just did a 150% size increase on a 6 megapixel *ist-D image using
Genuine Fractals and it looks
Good slide film and the world's most perfect scanning job.
C
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 12:51 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:37:09 +0300
From: Gasha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist-D photos
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text
Michel Carrère-Gée a écrit:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
I think Dario B. tried to tell us last week. It was 3 by 3 with two
'wings' on the horizontal direction. Bob S.
Dumb question, anyone know whatth 11 sensor AF
pattern is, I've seem the metering but not AF sensor
placement, anyone know
themselves, there is nothing more to be said from me.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 22:16
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
I seriously doubt that. 0 and 1 have their roots in math, far before
computers
Like I said, a 3 by 3 matrix with two wings on the horizontal direction.
1 + 3x3 + 1
Regards, Bob S.
In a message dated 2/28/03 4:21:07 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
***
*
***
3+5+3=11 good.
Michel
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 22:16
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
I seriously doubt that. 0 and 1 have their roots in math, far before
computers or hydraulics. 0 times something is nothing, 1 times
something is something. Algebra, Boolean math, etc. I can't think
Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0 and 1 as equivalent to off and on connect only after you have been around
computers. the ISO committee that decided this along with a lot of other
symbols were aiming for a lot lower. since none of you guys bother reading
the documentation for the symbols
On 28 Feb 2003 at 8:54, Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
I'm working on a technical manual whose procedures were originally written
by a bright engineer. Yet in his drafts, he consisently writes, Turn the
power switch on (O), using the letter instead of the digit.
See ISO/IEC/JTC1 Graphical
On Thursday 27 February 2003 23:07, Mark Roberts wrote:
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 February 2003 16:52, Mike Johnston wrote:
I prefer the following symbols for on and off:
On for on
Off for off
These make sense to me and I seldom find myself confused
This is a really silly thread.
I'm guessing that once one buys the camera, takes the 15 seconds to figure out
how to turn it on and off (assuming that one doesn't know what the symbols
mean), it will be remembered pretty much forever.
What freaking difference does it make ~what the symbols are~?
thanks, Rob, i couldn't find which ISO standard number it was. looked all over the ISO
web site.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:15
Subject: Re: ON and OFF symbols (was: Re: *ist D photos
On 27 Feb 2003 at 0:26, Mike Johnston wrote:
Don't count on ISO 50 - if this is the same chip as the D100 slowest
ISO is 200. But I believe it does go to 1600.
That's not chip-dependent, that's circuitry-dependent, I'm pretty sure.
It's both, the chip has inherent noise as do the
Alan,
That is only useful if you can preview the shot. Because of the SLR
nature - the mirror/prism in the way, you can't preview the shot. None
of the existing DSLR's have a swing LCD - no benefit except to break
easier.
Bruce
Thursday, February 27, 2003, 12:19:10 AM, you wrote:
AC
I want one.
This is just what I wanted: a DSLR which can take my macro lens without
requiring a mortgage to do so.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
Wow!
Ken
Well aren't they just something else. You have just made my day, must get
going to work!
Ziggy
LOL Alan!
Well, what do you expect - the anticipation got the better of us for a
while there...
-Original Message-
From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 February 2003 08:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
Where's the swing LCD? Isn't it useful
more pics at http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/03022602pentaxistd.asp
Ramesh
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:33 AM
To: Alan Chan
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
Alan,
That is only useful if you can preview the shot
Finally!
Very nice indeed.
That camera is SMALL.
Sorry, that should read:
THAT CAMERA IS small.
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
on 27.02.03 10:29, Nagaraj, Ramesh at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more pics at http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/03022602pentaxistd.asp
Have you seen lens sunshade? It is petal type - this means that this new
wide zoom has IF (internal focusing) and thus doesn't rotate its front!
--
Best
Black is good... that silver body reminds me too much of a cheap EOS
Kiss...
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 07:51 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And it is black !!
I've just fallen in love with this camera. Its an excellent combinations of
both MZ-like and Z-like designs.
WOW
Regards
Artur
- Original Message -
From: KT Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:50 AM
Subject: *ist D photos
Wow!
Looks really good, two wheels a bit like the PZ-1p ...
And my 31mm and 77mm limiteds in black look like a perfect match :-)
Regards, JvW
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:09:23 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
I think Dario B. tried to tell us last week. It was 3 by 3 with two 'wings'
on the horizontal direction. Bob S.
Dumb question, anyone know whatth 11 sensor AF
pattern is, I've seem the metering but not AF sensor
placement, anyone know or did I miss something.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
My brain does not process icons well. I still find it a 50-50 proposition
selecting between O and I when I want to power on new computer
equipment - I
have no idea if O means On or empty or Off or what.
Those are not O I, they are 0 (zero ) and 1 (one).
What ISO spec?
There are a ton of ISO specs, aren't there?
keith
Herb Chong wrote:
have you read the ISO spec?
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 02:42
Subject: RE: *ist D photos
I
That gets both my thumbs up! If God had given me a few more thumbs it would
get them too... But unfortunately I've only got two.
But then you wouldn't be able to operate a camera...you'd be all thumbs
GROAN
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hess
What's a Hyper button?
Someone's already pressed it ;-)
This list has gone nuts!
Cotty
Nope, just plain crazy..
Ziggy
Hardly intuitive, is it.
In what parlance/language does 1 stand for on? Binary? On an A/C
line power switch?
And, if it was meant to be a zero, it should have had the slant bar
thru it, like '0', to avoid just this sort of ambiguity.
Hmmm. The electrical symbol for current is 'I'...
This could probably done pretty easily using some kind of MLU feature. Does
the film *ist have MLU?
Evan
Rob Brigham wrote:
According to this clip from CNet, the 1.8 LCD on this new Pentax can
also be used as a viewfinder - if true, this will be a first for a DSLR.
Only one word. Tiny.
Ok, and a comment, amazingly like the film *ist.
At 08:50 PM 2/26/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
Wow!
Ken
Outside of a dog, a
On Thursday 27 February 2003 07:01, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 26 Feb 2003 at 23:26, Stan Halpin wrote:
Can anyone explain the icon on the front for me? It shows an open
rectangle sitting on two inward sloping wedges or ramps or something. The
icon is next to the button just above the
On Thursday 27 February 2003 16:52, Mike Johnston wrote:
I prefer the following symbols for on and off:
On for on
Off for off
These make sense to me and I seldom find myself confused
--Mike
No, that doesn't make sense.
This makes sense:
Aan for on
Uit for off
--
Frits Wüthrich
Hardly intuitive, is it.
In what parlance/language does 1 stand for on? Binary? On an A/C
line power switch?
And, if it was meant to be a zero, it should have had the slant bar
thru it, like '0', to avoid just this sort of ambiguity.
Hmmm. The electrical symbol for current is 'I'...
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 February 2003 16:52, Mike Johnston wrote:
I prefer the following symbols for on and off:
On for on
Off for off
These make sense to me and I seldom find myself confused
--Mike
No, that doesn't make sense.
This makes sense:
Aan
Where are the *ist D
Photos.
Here: www.fotopolis.pl (scroll down the page). As someone else on this list
said quite recently - shameless self-promotion :-)
And here: www.dpreview.com (unfortunatelly on the bottom of the page in the
old news) - much more than on Fotopolis..
(I assume that's
Five pix here:
http://digilander.libero.it/aohc/pressrelease/istde.htm
Bye,
Dario Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
Hi All,
I've been gone for four days
]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
Hi All,
I've been gone for four days and just
resubscribed. Where are the *ist D
Photos. (I assume that's the new digital body).
Paul
was not on their minds. binary 0 and 1 definitely for on and off
was not commonplace knowledge then and still
isn't.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 07:43
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
Those are not O I
No it means that the minimum aperture is 22 at 18mm and 32 at 35mm.
At 01:28 PM 2/27/2003 +1000, you wrote:
Thanks Ken. This looks an excellent match cosmetically for the MZ-S.
Did anyone else notice the engravings on the FAJ lens mounted on it?
f4(22)-5.6(32). Is that the range or does it mean
Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
I'm aware of that, Cot, but I wonder from whence it came?
The U.S. has only used that convention for a reasonably short time ~
10 years maybe?
Recall that we're still on English units as well.
Tell me what English units from which 1 and 0
, 2003 07:43
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
Those are not O I, they are 0 (zero ) and 1 (one).
zero = off, 1 = on. Very easy.
JCO
Hardly intuitive, is it.
In what parlance/language does 1 stand for on? Binary? On an A/C
line power switch?
And, if it was meant to be a zero
Keith Whaley wrote:
Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
I'm aware of that, Cot, but I wonder from whence it came?
The U.S. has only used that convention for a reasonably short time ~
10 years maybe?
Recall that we're still on English units as well.
My point is that the US tends to be
Keith Whaley wrote:
Herb Chong wrote:
hydraulic engineering. i had this explained to me by an IBM design engineer who
designed the externals of computer monitors. it was
a bunch of mechanical engineers who designed the symbols in the late 60's/early 70's.
the thought of ubiquitous computers and
, February 27, 2003 07:43
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
Those are not O I, they are 0 (zero ) and 1 (one).
zero = off, 1 = on. Very easy.
Here's a reference:
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52344.html
Looks like it's a least from the 1600s.
R
The base English measurement system is binary (for liquid, dry volumes and
weights
is binary, look at the measures from 1 oz to 1 quart and think about it a
while, I'll bet you
can see the exceptions right away), but it's based on a binary pattern.
At 06:57 PM 2/27/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Ryan
Even non-latinic folks tend to understand/use 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
and 9.
Well, they're not latinic to start with, but Arabic. (Latinic would
be the ol' Roman numerals - e.g., I, II, III, IV, etc.)
Fred
I'd hardly call not adopting a French attempt to dominate everything
from the 17th century being behind on standards.
(Ducking now and donning flame proof suit).
At 09:14 PM 2/27/2003 -0600, you wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
I'm aware of that, Cot, but I
Interesting. The system of 'I' for on, and '0' for off is pretty much a
widely accepted thing in Europe...
Cotty
Well, know you know how far behind the times we are here in the colonies :-)
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
I think Dario B. tried to tell us last week. It was 3 by 3 with two 'wings'
on the horizontal direction. Bob S.
Dumb question, anyone know whatth 11 sensor AF
pattern is, I've seem the metering but not AF sensor
placement, anyone know or did I miss something.
See
On 26 Feb 2003 at 20:50, KT Takeshita wrote:
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
Wow!
It's very different from the film *ist.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
Best photos yet, Ken...Thanks, keith
KT Takeshita wrote:
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
Wow!
Ken
Thanks Ken, now I'm impressed! Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
Wow!
Ken
Way cool! As I suspected, very PZ-1p like - they are thumb/finger
wheels rather than big dials on the ZX-5n. It looks like the Hyper
button is right next to the shutter button.
Bruce
Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 5:50:52 PM, you wrote:
KT Comrades!
KT
On 03.2.26 9:13 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Way cool! As I suspected, very PZ-1p like - they are thumb/finger
wheels rather than big dials on the ZX-5n. It looks like the Hyper
button is right next to the shutter button.
There appears a very slight slant of shoulder, not so
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
Nice, nice, nice!
Jim
--
___
Get your free Verizonmail at www.verizonmail.com
I think I just fell in lust again.for the tenth time today.
--
Ken Archer Canine Photography
San Antonio, Texas
Business Is Going To The Dogs
That gets both my thumbs up! If God had given me a few more thumbs it would
get them too... But unfortunately Ive only got two.
From: KT Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *ist D photos
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:50:52 -0500
oh ye plzzee
precious.
now
:-)
Shaun
KT Takeshita wrote:
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
Wow!
Ken
.
--
-Original Message-
From: KT Takeshita [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/is
t-D-1L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/is
t-D-2L.jpg
Wow!
Nice.
Does it look slightly Nikon-y to anyone?
]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *ist D photos
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:50:52 -0500
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
Wow
Does it look slightly Nikon-y to anyone?
Well, I don't know. All I know is I really like it. It looks much better
than the film *ist. Actually, I'd like a film body that looks like that.
Nice :-)
Lukasz
--r-e-k-l-a-m-a-
Tanie bilety lotnicze!
Looks cool.
Jim A.
From: KT Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:50:52 -0500
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *ist D photos
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:49:13 -0500
Comrades!
http
YES
but who cares anyway.
--- tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: KT Takeshita [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/is
t-D-1L.jpg
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:58:47 -0500, you wrote:
Does it look slightly Nikon-y to anyone?
It has some similarities to the D100 in external controls - finger and
thumb wheels, four-way controller, a few buttons to left of the LCD,
single dial for TV-AV Pgm and ISO, with a collar on the dial axis
Ken,
When PDMLers of the future examine the archives, they will credit you for
revealing the first photos of the *ist D. Thanks from all of us.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I figure I'm like that kid Mikey in the breakfast cereal
commercial. I'm no fan of the styling of most modern cameras.
We'll show the *ist D to frankie, he hates everything!
(and here, we take a moment, imagining that I'm perusing the new camera)
HE LIKES IT! FRANKIE ACTUALLY LIKES IT!
Ken Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I just fell in lust again.for the tenth time today.
In the 1970s, lyricist/composer Stephen Schwartz (Pippin, Working,
Pocahantas, The Hunchback of Notre Dame) wrote a song, Proud Lady. Sung by
a brash young man (She calls me a swine--she's mine!),
Thanks Ken. This looks an excellent match cosmetically for the MZ-S.
Did anyone else notice the engravings on the FAJ lens mounted on it?
f4(22)-5.6(32). Is that the range or does it mean that at 35mm the maximum
aperture is 22-32?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: jcoyle
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
Thanks Ken. This looks an excellent match cosmetically for the MZ-S.
Did anyone else notice the engravings on the FAJ lens mounted on it?
f4(22)-5.6(32). Is that the range or does it mean that at 35mm the
maximum
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
