ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: 28/2-class lens specs: Seven Third-Party Lenses vs. Three
Pentax 28/2s (was: Re: fast kiron on ebay)
On 10 Mar 2001, at 19:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To my eye, 28mm is the widest
practical focal length for "people-shooting," which
"
"Rob Studdert" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: 28/2-class lens specs: Seven Third-Party
Lenses vs. Three
Pentax 28/2s (was: Re: fast kiron on ebay)
On 10 Mar 2001, at 19:20,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To my eye, 28mm is the widest
practical focal length for "peopl
On 11 Mar 2001, at 10:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob,
A longer barrel--such as that used on the SMC 28/2, which was designed
with Zeiss--can bend the rays more "gently." Isn't extra barrel distortion
one of the compromises usually introduced by a shorter lens (unless,
perhaps, an
On 10 Mar 2001, at 19:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To my eye, 28mm is the widest
practical focal length for "people-shooting," which is what I do. True, it
makes people at the edges of the frame look fat. But this problem is
minimized by selecting a well-corrected prime.
Hi Paul,
Please
Paul -
Interesting table. Just to fill in a gap or two, I have a Vivitar 28 f2
(not the close focuing one) - minimum focusing distance is 1 meter, 6
aperture blades.
I ran some test with it when I first got the lens - I'd have to say it is
a so-so performer. I recently added a Rikenon 28 f2.8
5 matches
Mail list logo
