Indeed, Godfrey! Excellent news for Pentax. I'm very happy for the
company! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: A Review and A Rethink on my
Nice article in terms of details. The results are similar to what
I've read elsewhere, except that the Phase One itself is actually
tested. I was amused by the Canon/Leica comparison.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I haven't been through this whole thread, but I saw
On Nov 16, 2010, at 6:06 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Wasn't that BFG?
It was, but people soon tired of BFG.
>
> On 11/16/2010 2:17 AM, eckinator wrote:
>> BFD 9000 ]=)
>>
>> 2010/11/16 Steven Desjardins:
>>> BFD.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 14, 2010
2010/11/16 P. J. Alling :
>
> Wasn't that BFG?
yes. and to this day it makes me sad to know Hoya axed Pentax's railgun r&d...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follo
I haven't been through this whole thread, but I saw this one pop up
today that might be of interest:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/2010_mini_medium_format_shoot_out.shtml
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
> Just got this review of the D645. Maybe I'l
Wasn't that BFG?
On 11/16/2010 2:17 AM, eckinator wrote:
BFD 9000 ]=)
2010/11/16 Steven Desjardins:
BFD.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Miserere wrote:
2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher:
M
BFD 9000 ]=)
2010/11/16 Steven Desjardins :
> BFD.
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Miserere wrote:
2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher :
> Miserere wrote:
>
>> Maybe
Actually, that would be a Canon. The new Canon BF-D with a white lens
so big that fans will stop watching the game and look at you.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> BFD.
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Adam Ma
BFD.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Miserere wrote:
>>> 2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher :
Miserere wrote:
> Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on
On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Miserere wrote:
>> 2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher :
>>> Miserere wrote:
>>>
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
>>>
>>> Right after the MX-D.
>>
>> But not before th
For me, the MX was an ideal size for a walk around body.The E-P1
serves that purpose now. It's not ideal composing on the LCD but at
least this camera stays out of the way when I'm doing whatever else I
was there to do. Although I am taking the E-P1 and the K7 on a trip
to Disney World /weddi
Kodak DCS/DCS-100 had interchangeable finders, being essentially an
F3HP with a bunch of crap stuck on. Also the Hasselblad H3D/II/H4D
models do (which are all digital-only bodies, not film bodies with
digital backs).
-Adam
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:47 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> The MX was just a
The MX was just a bit too small. The LX was damned near perfect.
However the LX's claim to fame was it's system with interchangeable
finders etc. I don't know of any DSLR with interchangeable finders
which probably means something.
On 11/14/2010 2:33 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
What would
What would this be? K5 innards in an LX body? Were the ergonomics of
the LX that much better than the K7/K5? I've never used the legendary
body so I really don't know. Now, If they could squeeze the K5 into
the MX body That would be slick.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Miserere wrote:
> 2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher :
>> Miserere wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
>>
>> Right after the MX-D.
>
> But not before the MED Super.
>
>
> --
>
> \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMis
From: Miserere
On 13 November 2010 18:57, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> A dream kit should be wonderful, albeit expensive. ?It's nice to see
> Pentax finally make this camera and make it what the old 645 was in
> the film world.
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to
110D for me, please. With a 300/1.2 ]=)
2010/11/14 Miserere :
> 2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher :
>> Miserere wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
>>
>> Right after the MX-D.
>
> But not before the MED Super.
>
>
> --
>
> \/\/o/\/\ --> http:
2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher :
> Miserere wrote:
>
>> Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
>
> Right after the MX-D.
But not before the MED Super.
--
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photogra
Miserere wrote:
> Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
Right after the MX-D.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web : http://w
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Removed the batteries and Just sprayed it in from the outside.
You made my day.
I'll have to get hold of a new can of tuner spray as the old one is
still well full but doesn't have any pressure left. Had been sitting on
my shelf for an estimated 20 years. Still, got a d
On 11/13/2010 6:16 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
I must say his problem with the rear e-wheel sounds much like the
problem I had with my *ist-Ds, but that happened after about 4 years of
use, and was easily fixed with tuner cleaner, bought at Radio Shack.
Aha? My DS has t
On 13 November 2010 18:57, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> A dream kit should be wonderful, albeit expensive. It's nice to see
> Pentax finally make this camera and make it what the old 645 was in
> the film world.
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
--M.
-
A dream kit should be wonderful, albeit expensive. It's nice to see
Pentax finally make this camera and make it what the old 645 was in
the film world.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
> Just got this review of the D645. Maybe I'll pitch the previously posted
> list an
P. J. Alling wrote:
> I must say his problem with the rear e-wheel sounds much like the
> problem I had with my *ist-Ds, but that happened after about 4 years of
> use, and was easily fixed with tuner cleaner, bought at Radio Shack.
Aha? My DS has the same problem to an extent that it's almost
If it will help at all, you can do _much_ larger than 13x19" with your
current kit should you ever decide to.
My neighbor is a free-lance window designer for clothing retailers. He
had a few shots from my K20D printed on a kind of plastic coated paper
at sizes ranging from three feet by two up
Christine,
You're making trouble again!
As if the list with the K-5 and lenses wasn't expensive enough at $6K+,
now you point out the 645D for $10K w/o lenses!
I haven't got enough photography equipment to sell to raise that kind of money.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Christi
I must say his problem with the rear e-wheel sounds much like the
problem I had with my *ist-Ds, but that happened after about 4 years of
use, and was easily fixed with tuner cleaner, bought at Radio Shack. As
the electrical contacts for the e-wheel on the 645D is behind a weather
seal it migh
Good review, still too rich for my blood. I can make acceptable 11x14"
~ 13x19" with my current kit. Sadly I have no need for Poster size prints.
On 11/13/2010 11:51 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Just got this review of the D645. Maybe I'll pitch the previously
posted list and try for this Pen
I had to laugh at this line:
"All but the most die-hard Pentaxians despaired."
It should say ESPECIALLY the die-hard Pentaxians despaired LOL
--M.
On 13/11/2010, Christine Aguila wrote:
> Just got this review of the D645. Maybe I'll pitch the previously posted
> list and try for this Pentax
Just got this review of the D645. Maybe I'll pitch the previously posted
list and try for this Pentax kit instead :-). Anyway, really nice review
here.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pentax_645d___a_first_review.shtml
Cheers, Christine from Chicago
--
PDML Pentax-Dis
30 matches
Mail list logo
