on my Dream Pentax Kit :-)
I haven't been through this whole thread, but I saw this one pop up
today that might be of interest:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/2010_mini_medium_format_shoot_out.shtml
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote
Wasn't that BFG?
On 11/16/2010 2:17 AM, eckinator wrote:
BFD 9000 ]=)
2010/11/16 Steven Desjardinsdrd1...@gmail.com:
BFD.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colenl...@red4est.com wrote:
On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM,
I haven't been through this whole thread, but I saw this one pop up
today that might be of interest:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/2010_mini_medium_format_shoot_out.shtml
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Just got this review of
2010/11/16 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
Wasn't that BFG?
yes. and to this day it makes me sad to know Hoya axed Pentax's railgun rd...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On Nov 16, 2010, at 6:06 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Wasn't that BFG?
It was, but people soon tired of BFG.
On 11/16/2010 2:17 AM, eckinator wrote:
BFD 9000 ]=)
2010/11/16 Steven Desjardinsdrd1...@gmail.com:
BFD.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colenl...@red4est.com wrote:
On
Nice article in terms of details. The results are similar to what
I've read elsewhere, except that the Phase One itself is actually
tested. I was amused by the Canon/Leica comparison.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't been through this
On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
Right after
BFD.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe now they've
Actually, that would be a Canon. The new Canon BF-D with a white lens
so big that fans will stop watching the game and look at you.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
BFD.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Nov
BFD 9000 ]=)
2010/11/16 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
BFD.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher
P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Removed the batteries and Just sprayed it in from the outside.
You made my day.
I'll have to get hold of a new can of tuner spray as the old one is
still well full but doesn't have any pressure left. Had been sitting on
my shelf for an
Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
Right after the MX-D.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio :
2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
Right after the MX-D.
But not before the MED Super.
--
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
110D for me, please. With a 300/1.2 ]=)
2010/11/14 Miserere miser...@gmail.com:
2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
Right after the MX-D.
But not before the MED
From: Miserere
On 13 November 2010 18:57, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
A dream kit should be wonderful, albeit expensive. ?It's nice to see
Pentax finally make this camera and make it what the old 645 was in
the film world.
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/14 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the LXD.
Right after the MX-D.
But not before the MED Super.
--
What would this be? K5 innards in an LX body? Were the ergonomics of
the LX that much better than the K7/K5? I've never used the legendary
body so I really don't know. Now, If they could squeeze the K5 into
the MX body That would be slick.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, John Sessoms
The MX was just a bit too small. The LX was damned near perfect.
However the LX's claim to fame was it's system with interchangeable
finders etc. I don't know of any DSLR with interchangeable finders
which probably means something.
On 11/14/2010 2:33 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
What would
Kodak DCS/DCS-100 had interchangeable finders, being essentially an
F3HP with a bunch of crap stuck on. Also the Hasselblad H3D/II/H4D
models do (which are all digital-only bodies, not film bodies with
digital backs).
-Adam
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:47 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com
For me, the MX was an ideal size for a walk around body.The E-P1
serves that purpose now. It's not ideal composing on the LCD but at
least this camera stays out of the way when I'm doing whatever else I
was there to do. Although I am taking the E-P1 and the K7 on a trip
to Disney World
Just got this review of the D645. Maybe I'll pitch the previously posted
list and try for this Pentax kit instead :-). Anyway, really nice review
here.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pentax_645d___a_first_review.shtml
Cheers, Christine from Chicago
--
PDML
I had to laugh at this line:
All but the most die-hard Pentaxians despaired.
It should say ESPECIALLY the die-hard Pentaxians despaired LOL
--M.
On 13/11/2010, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Just got this review of the D645. Maybe I'll pitch the previously posted
list and
Good review, still too rich for my blood. I can make acceptable 11x14
~ 13x19 with my current kit. Sadly I have no need for Poster size prints.
On 11/13/2010 11:51 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Just got this review of the D645. Maybe I'll pitch the previously
posted list and try for this
I must say his problem with the rear e-wheel sounds much like the
problem I had with my *ist-Ds, but that happened after about 4 years of
use, and was easily fixed with tuner cleaner, bought at Radio Shack. As
the electrical contacts for the e-wheel on the 645D is behind a weather
seal it
Christine,
You're making trouble again!
As if the list with the K-5 and lenses wasn't expensive enough at $6K+,
now you point out the 645D for $10K w/o lenses!
I haven't got enough photography equipment to sell to raise that kind of money.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM,
If it will help at all, you can do _much_ larger than 13x19 with your
current kit should you ever decide to.
My neighbor is a free-lance window designer for clothing retailers. He
had a few shots from my K20D printed on a kind of plastic coated paper
at sizes ranging from three feet by two up
P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I must say his problem with the rear e-wheel sounds much like the
problem I had with my *ist-Ds, but that happened after about 4 years of
use, and was easily fixed with tuner cleaner, bought at Radio Shack.
Aha? My DS has the same problem to an
A dream kit should be wonderful, albeit expensive. It's nice to see
Pentax finally make this camera and make it what the old 645 was in
the film world.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Just got this review of the D645. Maybe I'll pitch the
On 13 November 2010 18:57, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
A dream kit should be wonderful, albeit expensive. It's nice to see
Pentax finally make this camera and make it what the old 645 was in
the film world.
Maybe now they've got that out of their system they can move on to the
On 11/13/2010 6:16 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I must say his problem with the rear e-wheel sounds much like the
problem I had with my *ist-Ds, but that happened after about 4 years of
use, and was easily fixed with tuner cleaner, bought at
30 matches
Mail list logo
