Hi,
Sunday, July 21, 2002, 10:17:21 PM, you wrote:
I won't pursue my line of argument much further except to say my analogy of
film/TV was simply to show how different a function two seemingly similar
form of communication can be. And, while TV has become a metaphor for
triviality (I
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Cotty wrote:
5. Claim to be a photographic student. (this last one works for me - and
not a lie - i'm learning all the time!)
...all ways of guaranteeing people will ignore you.
Hey Cotty!
I liked your last advice. Let me try it out. :-)
Ayash.
Make sure
I thought that the whole point of an LCD is that it consumes low amounts
of power. . . . not that I'm trying to attack your use of the
viewfinder, I myself prefer using the viewfinder, although the most
technically complex slr I have is a Super Program . . .
IL Bill
a digital camer's LCD is
Ayash wrote:
Uhhh, h, the rotary vacuam pump is giving problem. I have to rush for
it now.
Oh yeah - that's a pain. That happened to me once and I couldn't sit down
for a week...
;-)
Cot
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL
check the gasket
check the oil sealing
check the oil quality? Has it gone bad? Yes?
then change it. another messy job. getting a good bath with vacuam pump
oil of grade 18. :-(
Oh no! What you have done? You have used the wrong grade. Use grade 100.
Drain it out. Another bath but this
Herb, et al . . .
First of all, who's this Al guy? :-) . . .
. . . somehow I missed that it was a digital camera, which explains
it all. When I originally posted I was thinking about the basic LCD
(like the one in the super program, in date backs and in watches . . .).
Thanks for the
In a message dated 7/21/2002 6:15:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't study it too much. It was meant to be nonsensical so it
would fit right into the discussion.
Fair enough. I actually thought at first you might be refering to the way
films sell products
In a message dated 7/21/2002 2:32:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I wrote there was not very clear - this is a problem with email
which doesn't really encourage careful proof-reading (I expect you'll
jump on this as evidence for your position).
No, I won't. Fact
On 21 Jul 2002 at 17:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With respect to the digital photography question, I'm convinced that it is a
different form of communication than traditional photography. As I say, perhaps
we don't know exactly how yet, but I think some of the implications I mentioned
are
In a message dated 7/21/2002 4:03:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Had the Lewinski (film) photo not been properly handled after it was
rejected
by the editors and sent back to the photographer it wouldn't exist either,
and
how easy would it have been to scan
He'd noticed that rather than spending all their time
watching the event through the viewfinder, they were taking their eyes
off the action and reviewing/editing what they'd just shot.
i have my LCD disabled normally because it saves a lot of power and it gets
in the way of using the optical
11 matches
Mail list logo
