Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Say, PhotoShop is a de-facto standard. Say, it is more likely that Adobe
would last longer than smaller companies who produce dedicated RAW
software. Say, Adobe is fully integrated package where you get all
you need. I can probably go on for a bit longer.
I
Hi!
> > Say, PhotoShop is a de-facto standard. Say, it is more likely that Adobe
> > would last longer than smaller companies who produce dedicated RAW
> > software. Say, Adobe is fully integrated package where you get all
> > you need. I can probably go on for a bit longer.
>
> I think i'll be go
Quoting Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If you can get CS2, I humbly suggest you do so... There are many reasons
for this...
Say, PhotoShop is a de-facto standard. Say, it is more likely that Adobe
would last longer than smaller companies who produce dedicated RAW
software. Say, Adobe is f
Hi!
Just need a few thoughts on this.
Would it be better to upgrade to CS2(cost about $450 or so to upgrade
my PSEL3) or get a single dedicated Raw program like Raw shooter or
Capture one.
El3 and CS can open every raw file i need, except the new D200. I can
get the plug in for EL3 but not for
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Advice. Upgrade to CS2 or get dedicated Raw program
Just need a few thoughts on this.
Would it be better to upgrade to CS2(cost about $450 or so to upgrade my
PSEL3) or get a single dedicated Raw
program lik
Yup.
When i bought the D1 and computers from the photographer, he left on
the computer his copy of PS 6 and a back up CD.
Elements i bought to use Raw on the PC.
I have a "Loaner Copy" of CS,but i would like a proper copy of CS2.
My delemia now is, do i get a PC version or Mac version. I fi
... or a friendly student who can purchase you a copy at educational
discount.
Godfrey
On Apr 22, 2006, at 9:00 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Ahh, I didn't know that you didn't have an earlier, legal version of
Photoshop. If you can find a used legal copy of an earlier
version, you
might be
Ahh, I didn't know that you didn't have an earlier, legal version of
Photoshop. If you can find a used legal copy of an earlier version, you
might be able to save quite a few $$$.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Dave Brooks
> From the Adobe store when i looked for upgrading info.
> Its qui
graywolf wrote:
> Personally, I consider CS2 to be the first Photoshop
> upgrade since 6.0 to be worth the cost. I do not see
> how a professional or semi-professional photographer
> could get along without it. Download the trial version
> and check it out.
Had you read Dave's post in it's
I've not yet sorted out Smart Sharpening, but it looks to be a nice option
when regular USM and it's various techniques may not do the trick.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Even ignoring the advantages in using Bridge/Camera Raw 3.3 over the
> CS' File Browser and Came
Quoting Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dave,
You can download the latest iteration of Adobes DNG converter, and skip the
CS2 or Elements upgrade. The DNG converter is free, and will allow you to
use the D200 Raw files.
Did not know that.
Frankly, I'm thrilled with the results from Ph
Personally, I consider CS2 to be the first Photoshop upgrade since 6.0
to be worth the cost. I do not see how a professional or
semi-professional photographer could get along without it. Download the
trial version and check it out.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.
I much prefer to develop skills with one high quality solution that
scales to do all the work rather than having to work through and
learn the ins and outs of coordinating several different
applications. Photoshop CS2's automation, browsing and sorting, batch
facilities, scripting and RGB e
I agree. Bridge & ACR 3.3 is an excellent improvement over PSCS.
I've been working on and off for the last few of months on scanning &
retoucing some very old & dirty slides. I love the healing brush :-)
Dave S
On 4/22/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I'm not Dave, b
Hi Dave,
I'm not Dave, but I'll jump in anyway and say that CS2 is really a darned
good program. Bering able to use ACR3.3 is, IMO, a big step up from
ACR2.4, which is the last version that can be used in CS. The Spot healing
Brush is great - I love it - it makes working on those old TX negs a l
Dave,
You can download the latest iteration of Adobes DNG converter, and skip the
CS2 or Elements upgrade. The DNG converter is free, and will allow you to
use the D200 Raw files.
Frankly, I'm thrilled with the results from Photoshop, both CS and even ore
so with CS2. If you can afford it comfo
How do you like using CS2?
I'd recommend upgrading to CS2. Personally I like to keep the number
of programs needed to process my images to a minimum.
If dollars are tight many people speak highly of RAW Shooter.
Dave S
On 4/22/06, Dave Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just need a few though
Just need a few thoughts on this.
Would it be better to upgrade to CS2(cost about $450 or so to upgrade my PSEL3)
or get a single dedicated Raw
program like Raw shooter or Capture one.
El3 and CS can open every raw file i need, except the new D200. I can get the
plug in for EL3 but not for CS.
18 matches
Mail list logo
