Re: And now for something different

Bookmarked! Thank you Juan. --Gonz On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 4:04 PM Juan Buhler wrote: > > Gonz, > > In order to go from 2048D to 2D, there are a couple of techniques for > dimensionality reduction out there. I'm using the most common one. Look > here: > > https://lvdmaaten.github.io/tsne/ > >

Re: And now for something different

Gonz, In order to go from 2048D to 2D, there are a couple of techniques for dimensionality reduction out there. I'm using the most common one. Look here: https://lvdmaaten.github.io/tsne/ j -- Juan Buhler - http://www.juanbuhler.com -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send

Re: And now for something different

It all sounds pretty straightforward, but I'm curious about the last step of folding 2048D -> 2D. Must involve some kind of clustering? How is this done? This seems key. --gonz On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 11:47 AM Juan Buhler wrote: > > > Just out of curiosity, what was the input to the Neural

Re: And now for something different

Hello Juan, > On 4 Apr 2021, at 18:46, Juan Buhler wrote: > >> Just out of curiosity, what was the input to the Neural Network? >> Keywords, descriptions? > > No, it's just the pixels themselves. I'm using a pretrained convolutional > neural network, or CNN. You know how Google Photos is able

Re: And now for something different

Here is another version, without overlap between photos: https://twitter.com/juanbuhler/status/1379201237187395584 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EyPn2IVUYAMv5BO?format=jpg=4096x4096 j -- Juan Buhler - http://www.juanbuhler.com On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 2:22 PM Juan Buhler wrote: > > I made a

Re: And now for something different

Depends on how they stack the bundles. On 4/5/2021 08:58:36, ann sanfedele wrote: Indeed.. $63,000,000 worth. but I have to say I thought it was very beautiful ann On 4/5/2021 8:45 AM, John wrote: There was something about "NFT" in the news recently. On 4/3/2021 18:14:29, ann sanfedele

Re: And now for something different

Indeed.. $63,000,000 worth. but I have to say I thought it was very beautiful ann On 4/5/2021 8:45 AM, John wrote: There was something about "NFT" in the news recently. On 4/3/2021 18:14:29, ann sanfedele wrote: er. bad time for me to typo.. I meant NFT..  :-) We will soon know who has to

Re: And now for something different

There was something about "NFT" in the news recently. On 4/3/2021 18:14:29, ann sanfedele wrote: er. bad time for me to typo.. I meant NFT..  :-) We will soon know who has to ask what I'm talking about... Meanwhile - it is a handsome image by itself - rather Escheresque ann On 4/3/2021

Re: And now for something different

On 4 Apr 2021, at 17:47, Juan Buhler wrote:  Just out of curiosity, what was the input to the Neural Network? Keywords, descriptions? No, it's just the pixels themselves. I'm using a pretrained convolutional neural network, [...] In order to make the plot, I use a technique that "folds"

Re: And now for something different

> Just out of curiosity, what was the input to the Neural Network? > Keywords, descriptions? No, it's just the pixels themselves. I'm using a pretrained convolutional neural network, or CNN. You know how Google Photos is able to separate photos into categories, with dogs, food, mountains, etc?

Re: And now for something different

Interesting Juan! > On 3 Apr 2021, at 23:22, Juan Buhler wrote: > > I made a plot of about 3000 of my photos (all posted to my photoblog over > the years) according to positions in the plane that come from a neural > network. > > Without getting into technical detail: images that are close to

Re: And now for something different

er. bad time for me to typo.. I meant NFT..  :-) We will soon know who has to ask what I'm talking about... Meanwhile - it is a handsome image by itself - rather Escheresque ann On 4/3/2021 6:07 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: Sooo Juan, how much is the NFD file selling for?  :-) ann On 4/3/2021

Re: And now for something different

Sooo Juan, how much is the NFD file selling for?  :-) ann On 4/3/2021 5:22 PM, Juan Buhler wrote: I made a plot of about 3000 of my photos (all posted to my photoblog over the years) according to positions in the plane that come from a neural network. Without getting into technical detail:

Re: And now for something different

Very interesting. Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 5:23 PM Juan Buhler wrote: > I made a plot of about 3000 of my photos (all posted to my photoblog over > the years) according to positions in the plane that

And now for something different

I made a plot of about 3000 of my photos (all posted to my photoblog over the years) according to positions in the plane that come from a neural network. Without getting into technical detail: images that are close to each other are semantically similar to each other. So there are areas of photos

Re: now for something ... different

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Interesting piece: a movie photographed entirely with a Canon 20D still camera... Heh - I guess that's one way of achieving HDTV quality :-) S

Re: now for something ... different

Interesting indeed. It does use up an awful lot of memory, however, and took a while to download and watch. Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Interesting piece: a movie photographed entirely with a Canon 20D still camera... http://patrykrebisz.com/stills/FINAL_movie.html QuickTime format.

Re: now for something ... different

Fascinating. I couldn't stop watching. Very well done. I would guess it was shot in relatively lo-res jpeg in order to get maximum fps. Looks like maybe four or five fps? I once shot some twenty to thirty frame segments of a race car with my LX and the five fps motor drive. They were edited

Re: now for something ... different

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Interesting piece: a movie photographed entirely with a Canon 20D still camera... http://patrykrebisz.com/stills/FINAL_movie.html QuickTime format. Godfrey Pretty good! by the way, the lady's camera sure looks like an Optio S5i! ;-) keith

Re: now for something ... different

PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 11:40 AM Subject: Re: now for something ... different Fascinating. I couldn't stop watching. Very well done. I would guess it was shot in relatively lo-res jpeg in order to get maximum fps. Looks like maybe four or five fps? I once

Re: now for something ... different

On Aug 10, 2005, at 8:55 AM, keithw wrote: Interesting piece: a movie photographed entirely with a Canon 20D still camera... http://patrykrebisz.com/stills/FINAL_movie.html QuickTime format. Pretty good! by the way, the lady's camera sure looks like an Optio S5i! ;-) You made me

Re: now for something ... different

Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting piece: a movie photographed entirely with a Canon 20D still camera... http://patrykrebisz.com/stills/FINAL_movie.html QuickTime format. How about a feature-length major motion picture? Tim Burton's new stop-motion film, The Corpse

Re: now for something ... different

On Aug 10, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: How about a feature-length major motion picture? Tim Burton's new stop-motion film, The Corpse Bride (to be released in the fall), was shot entirely with the Canon 1D-II. http://www.editorsguild.com/newsletter/JulAug05/julaug05_bride.html

Re: now for something ... different

Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 10, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: How about a feature-length major motion picture? Tim Burton's new stop-motion film, The Corpse Bride (to be released in the fall), was shot entirely with the Canon 1D-II.