Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone used the cheapo Pentax Optio60?
Dario, do you mind sharing your likes/dislikes about
the Optio60?
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Untouched, straight from
Thanks, Juan.
-Lon
BTW, Juan and Lon rhyme. Even though the spelling doesn't
indicate such.
Juan Buhler wrote:
I have it. It isn't bad at all for a $160 camera. The main image
quality problem is I think the jpeg compression--when combined with
the sensor noise, it can make some nasty artifa
I have it. It isn't bad at all for a $160 camera. The main image
quality problem is I think the jpeg compression--when combined with
the sensor noise, it can make some nasty artifacts that are hard to
get rid of, even with NeatImage or Noise Ninja. I wish these cameras
had a raw mode, it seems to m
Enjoy,
Dario
- Original Message - From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 5:45 PM
Subject: Anyone used the cheapo Pentax Optio60?
I know the Optio60 ain't got SMC. My guess
is that it is sluggish and slow. JPG only, etc.
But
ECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 5:45 PM
Subject: Anyone used the cheapo Pentax Optio60?
I know the Optio60 ain't got SMC. My guess
is that it is sluggish and slow. JPG only, etc.
But it's small, has an optical viewfinder, and
might be good enough to produce n
I know the Optio60 ain't got SMC. My guess
is that it is sluggish and slow. JPG only, etc.
But it's small, has an optical viewfinder, and
might be good enough to produce nice CRT-only
shots. Cheap, too. Comments?
-Lon
6 matches
Mail list logo
