Indeed, I agree with you, Brian. If one own more than one camera system
- the adaptall lenses are a blessing. It just so happens that I own only
Pentax ;-).
Boris
Brian Walters wrote:
> I've been using this version for years and think it's excellent.
> However, I've never had anything else to co
I've been using this version for years and think it's excellent. However, I've
never had anything else to compare it with.
It's an adaptall 2 lens which adds to its usability immeasurably. In addition
to the Pentax K/KA bodies, I've used it on an old Konica T3, various M42 bodies
and, ama
Behalf Of Frits Wüthrich
> Sent: 06 April, 2007 10:34 PM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
>
>
> I have the AF version of the 90mm Tamron f2.8 in Pentax
> mount, very happy with
> it. It is probably more flare prone then Pentax glas.
> H
I have the AF version of the 90mm Tamron f2.8 in Pentax mount, very happy with
it. It is probably more flare prone then Pentax glas.
However, why would you give up the FA 100/2.8?
On Friday 06 April 2007 16:06, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Dave, I used to have Tamron 90/2.5 the earlier version with 49
David J Brooks wrote:
> I have one for the Nikon mount, and i really like it. Good design,
> light weigh, nice and sharp.
>
> Anyone have one in Pentax mount.
>
> Happy with it.
>
> I'm thinking of getting that, if the response is good, and sell the af 100
> F2.8
>
> Dave
As good as the Tamro
Friday, April 06, 2007 10:46 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
>
>
> Which brings me to wonder why, if it has all that the older heavier,
> bulkier one had, didn't they made it like that in the first place...
>
> -
List
Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
Which brings me to wonder why, if it has all that the older heavier,
bulkier one had, didn't they made it like that in the first place...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Lib
Still not cigar.
David J Brooks wrote:
> Sorry.
>
> Try this one.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2nb9bs
>
> Dave
>
> On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The link does not work for me...
>>
>>
>> David J Brooks wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.henrys.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Item
ED] On Behalf Of
>> J. C. O'Connell
>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 3:43 PM
>> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
>> Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
>>
>> Which one? they made several different
>> 90mm macro lenses.
Same result :-(. But I suppose I know what you're talking about - Modern
90/2.8 AF variety.
David J Brooks wrote:
> Sorry.
>
> Try this one.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2nb9bs
>
> Dave
>
> On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The link does not work for me...
>>
>>
>> David J Br
I couldn't possibly tell :-(. I wonder that myself.
Boris
Minelli Flavio wrote:
> Which brings me to wonder why, if it has all that the older heavier,
> bulkier one had, didn't they made it like that in the first place...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/
entax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
Pentax produces DFA 100/2.8 which seems (I am not sure really) no worse
than FA version and it is really light and small (49 mm filter
threads)...
It is also said to be optimized for digital and it does cover full 35 mm
Sorry.
Try this one.
http://tinyurl.com/2nb9bs
Dave
On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The link does not work for me...
>
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
> > http://www.henrys.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ItemsDisplay?catalogId=10001&departmentId=10407&itemID=132354&categoryId=10
Pentax produces DFA 100/2.8 which seems (I am not sure really) no worse
than FA version and it is really light and small (49 mm filter threads)...
It is also said to be optimized for digital and it does cover full 35 mm
frame.
Boris
David J Brooks wrote:
> On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PR
The link does not work for me...
David J Brooks wrote:
> http://www.henrys.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ItemsDisplay?catalogId=10001&departmentId=10407&itemID=132354&categoryId=10412
>
> If the link works, this one
>
> Dave
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
.
>
> Ciao, Flavio
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> J. C. O'Connell
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 3:43 PM
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
>
&
On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave, I used to have Tamron 90/2.5 the earlier version with 49 mm filter
> threads. I had it with KA adaptall adapter. It was splendid lens. There
> was just one very small problem with it. Sometimes it would produce a
> flare/glare circle stra
Dave, I used to have Tamron 90/2.5 the earlier version with 49 mm filter
threads. I had it with KA adaptall adapter. It was splendid lens. There
was just one very small problem with it. Sometimes it would produce a
flare/glare circle straight in the middle of the frame. That was with
*istD at l
5
was from the eighties, IIRC.
Ciao, Flavio
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J. C. O'Connell
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 3:43 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
Which on
] On Behalf Of
David J Brooks
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 9:20 AM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
I have one for the Nikon mount, and i really like it. Good design, light
weigh, nice and sharp.
Anyone have one in Pentax mount.
Happy with it.
I'm thinki
I have one for the Nikon mount, and i really like it. Good design,
light weigh, nice and sharp.
Anyone have one in Pentax mount.
Happy with it.
I'm thinking of getting that, if the response is good, and sell the af 100 F2.8
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksintheco
21 matches
Mail list logo