I remember the outrage when Vaughn Meader came out with the LP "The First
Family" in 1962 in which he imitated President Kennedy's voice. My 7th grade
teachers were infuriated with this lack of respect for the president. What a
difference 50 years makes.
Jeffery
On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:04 PM, P.
There are so many ways that's just wrong...
On 11/5/2010 11:32 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Americans may have fallen out of love with Barack Obama, but the
president of the United States is still an object of affection for the
Chinese:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/
that must be what Republicans mean when they talk about getting the guvmint off
their backs.
>
> Americans may have fallen out of love with Barack Obama, but the president
> of the United States is still an object of affection for the
> Chinese:
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/north
Americans may have fallen out of love with Barack Obama, but the
president of the United States is still an object of affection for the
Chinese:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/8107377/Obama-sex-doll-for-sale-in-China.html
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:14 PM, P.
On 11/4/2010 2:03 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 13:49, Brian Walters wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10 -0400, "Christian Skofteland"
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work
I don't think you should be using "Obama" and "blunt" in the same
sentence, too close to Lese Majeste.
On 11/4/2010 1:59 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
President Obama has to architect a new plan to blunt the Republicans.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:1
On 11/4/2010 1:48 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:51 -0400, "David J Brooks"
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:16 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital
Darkroom > work...
The same time i spell a post corec
Hum, obviously you spend too much time post processing...
On 11/4/2010 1:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
Several years ago, as far as I can tell. I never used the term and I
can't remember the last time I heard anyone else
"double APS-C". Double C for short.
-Original Message-
From: "Bob W"
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:42:03
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Apropos of nothing really
> Maybe about t
> Maybe about the same time we stop referring to 35mm-sized imaging
> sensors as "full-frame?"
>
we should call it 'ample frame' or 'big boned'.
B
> ;-)
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vis
> >
> Digital Darkroom has a nice beat and you can dance to it Post processing
> sounds like you are dealing with mailed packages
>
perhaps we need to change it to popro, carrying with it a blended chemical
scent of popish incense, poo, rotting plants and the commercialisation of
sin.
> yeah, I'
On Nov 4, 2010, at 14:30, Brian Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:03 -0500, "Charles Robinson"
> wrote:
>> On Nov 4, 2010, at 13:49, Brian Walters wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10 -0400, "Christian Skofteland"
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling w
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:03 -0500, "Charles Robinson"
wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2010, at 13:49, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10 -0400, "Christian Skofteland"
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
> >>> When /will/ we stop referring to post proc
On 10-11-04 3:03 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 13:49, Brian Walters wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10 -0400, "Christian Skofteland"
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work.
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 00:36:23 +0530
Subash wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 05:49:08 +1100
> "Brian Walters" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10 -0400, "Christian Skofteland"
> > > About the same time we stop using "architect" as a verb...
> > Don't think I've come across that. A sample sentence
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 05:49:08 +1100
"Brian Walters" wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10 -0400, "Christian Skofteland"
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
> > > When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital
> > > Darkroom work...
> > >
> >
> >
On Nov 4, 2010, at 13:49, Brian Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10 -0400, "Christian Skofteland"
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>> When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
>>>
>>
>> About the same time we st
President Obama has to architect a new plan to blunt the Republicans.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10 -0400, "Christian Skofteland"
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
>> > When /will/ we stop referring to pos
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10 -0400, "Christian Skofteland"
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
> > When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
> >
>
> About the same time we stop using "architect" as a verb...
Don't think I've c
Brian Walters wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:51 -0400, "David J Brooks"
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:16 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom
> work...
The same time i spell a post corectly
Come on now. You did that on purpose
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:51 -0400, "David J Brooks"
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:16 PM, P. J. Alling
> wrote:
> > When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
>
> The same time i spell a post corectly
Come on now. You did that on purpose!
Cheers
Brian
>>When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
Several years ago, as far as I can tell. I never used the term and I
can't remember the last time I heard anyone else do so.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.n
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:31:02AM +0100, DagT wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
Digital Darkroom has a nice beat and you can dance to it
Post processing sounds like you are dealing with mailed packages
yeah, I'm back now
ann
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Nick David Wright
wrote:
> Maybe about the same time we stop referring to 35mm-sized imaging
> sensors as "full-frame?"
GAAH!
Oh, did I say that with my outside voice? 0:-)
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pd
On Nov 3, 2010, at 8:16 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
What do you mean *we*? white man.
(*) http://www.michaelclark.name/jokes/misc/the_lone_ranger_and_tonto.shtml
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom
work...
.. just after stopping calling it 'Brightroom' (truly in use over here :-)
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vis
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:31:02AM +0100, DagT wrote:
>
> >When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
> >
>
>
> The same time that we start referring to darkroom work as analogue post
> processing?
Which will be shortly after we stop dialing numbers on our cel
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
> When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
>
About the same time we stop using "architect" as a verb...
--
Christian
-
http://404notfound.blogspot.com
http://bir
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:16 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
The same time i spell a post corectly
Dave
>
> --
> "His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed
> moral bankruptcy."
> -Woody Al
Amen, Brother.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Nick David Wright
wrote:
> Maybe about the same time we stop referring to 35mm-sized imaging
> sensors as "full-frame?"
>
> ;-)
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:31 AM, DagT wrote:
>>
>>>When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroo
Maybe about the same time we stop referring to 35mm-sized imaging
sensors as "full-frame?"
;-)
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:31 AM, DagT wrote:
>
>>When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
>>
>
>
> The same time that we start referring to darkroom work as analogue
>When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
>
The same time that we start referring to darkroom work as analogue post
processing?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pleas
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
--
"His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral
bankruptcy."
-Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSU
I guess I'll have to give proper attribution eventually...
-Original Message-
>From: Bob Blakely
>Sent: Jan 28, 2009 6:03 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: On topic but apropos of nothing really...
>
>"I want to die in my sleep like my gran
"I want to die in my sleep like my grandfather... Not screaming and yelling
like the passengers in his car.", is attributd to Will Shriner.
He also said, "I almost got a girl pregnant in high school. It's costing me
a fortune to keep the rabbit on a life-support system."
and "Everything is driv
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Peter Alling wrote:
> I've discovered that if you beat the hell out of the 43mm limited eventualy
> it makes a god awful, grinding noise when it focuses, which actually makes
> Canon shooters cringe,
Cheap beer does the same thing, ask Cotty
Dave
>
> --
> PDML
I've discovered that if you beat the hell out of the 43mm limited eventualy it
makes a god awful, grinding noise when it focuses, which actually makes Canon
shooters cringe, (a bit of a nice side effect actually). It still focuses
smoothly, but I guess I should send it into Pentax for repair on
37 matches
Mail list logo
