From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or you could borrow a flash meter and run some of the
tests without burning
film ...
Careful! If the metering is done by measuring the light
reflected off the film, and there is no film in the
camera you will get an erroneous reading. The pressure
plate is less
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or you could borrow a flash meter and run some of the
tests without burning
film ...
Careful! If the metering is done by measuring the light
reflected off the film, and there is no film in the
camera you will get an erroneous reading. The pressure
plate is less
at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päivä: 16. toukokuuta 2002 18:09
Aihe: Camera Problems. Please Help!
I let a full day pass, and am finally composed enough
Thanks for all of the suggestions. Here is my reply (or replies) to the
comments thus far. Maybe this will help spark some other ideas. Otherwise,
it sounds like Pentax will be borrowing my equipment for a while (once
again!).
Paul:
You mentioned insufficient current (from rechargeables) as well
:39
Aihe: Re: Camera Problems. Please Help!
I'm professed to be an amateur at this butI've experienced a similar
occurrence with my equipment.
One time it occurred with the use of a 2x teleconverter that had gone bad.
The trigger mechanism for the shutter f stop had broken and would
Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes wrote:
I let a full day pass, and am finally composed enough to write this
email I recently received 4 rolls of slide film back from Kodak (Fair
Lawn), and the results were atrocious (and its no longer just because
of bad technique!). Specifically, more than 1/2 of
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Camera Problems. Please Help!
Thanks for all of the suggestions. Here is my reply (or replies) to the
comments thus far. Maybe this will help spark some other ideas. Otherwise,
it sounds like Pentax will be borrowing my equipment for a while (once
again!).
-
This message
On Thu, 16 May 2002, MANGUM,MARK (HP-USA,ex1) wrote:
How about the operation of the RTF (internal pop-up)
flash?
Do you get the same results? If it's only a 6-7ft
shot then the RTF should work for a test.
Blasted! I shouldve read this 5 minutes ago... I just finished running my
test roll
: Camera Problems. Please Help!
On Thu, 16 May 2002, MANGUM,MARK (HP-USA,ex1) wrote:
How about the operation of the RTF (internal pop-up)
flash?
Do you get the same results? If it's only a 6-7ft
shot then the RTF should work for a test.
Blasted! I shouldve read this 5 minutes ago... I just finished
Well, the test results are back and not a trace of misbehavior on the part
of either the flash or body; which is almost worse than otherwise
[systematic errors are much easier to identify]. So I havent a clue
still. I tried to vary things up as much as possible, and even shot in
dim conditions
Jerome,
I just looked at the pictures, the subject matter, and the equipment list. I think
you have operator error, a problem with the 'wet-ware'. g
Try seeing how far out (distance) you can use that AF330FTZ flash. Try some test
shots. Look for flash confirmation signals in the viewfinder
Try seeing how far out (distance) you can use
that AF330FTZ flash.
Try some test shots.
As allused to earlier, I try to stay pretty conscious of the effective
shooting range of my weak flash (usually with 6 to 15 feet, wide open).
Look for flash confirmation signals in the
viewfinder or on
From the pictures, you may simply be caught in the ambient vs. flash auto
camera syndrome, since the non-flash shots are ok. I do not have modern
equipment and do fill flash manually, so I am speculating. Check your camera
and flash manuals to see if you have things set up properly for fill
13 matches
Mail list logo
